Research Article

Horticultural Science and Technology. 30 June 2025. 357-372
https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20250032

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   Experimental plants and environmental conditions

  •   Investigation of morphophysiological characteristics

  •   Statistical analysis

  • Results and Discussion

  •   Survival and success rates

  •   Morphophysiological analysis

  • Conclusions

Introduction

Vegetative propagation methods such as stem, leaf, petiole, and root cuttings are highly effective when used to preserve the genetic stability of certain cultivars, including F1 hybrids and haploids, as well as variegated forms of plants, and specific mutations. Although some variegated traits may be lost through cutting propagation methods, maintaining these traits is significantly more feasible in this way than through seed propagation (Matsuo et al. 1989). These propagation methods not only preserve the characteristics of the mother plant but also allow for rapid mass propagation over a short period of time (Tchoundjeu et al. 2004; Ranawana and Eeswara 2008; Zhang et al. 2013). This approach is widely used in farms and plant nurseries because it is easy to implement and does not have the drawbacks associated with seed propagation (Kim and Kim 2015; Kwon and Cho 2023).

Among these methods, the stem-cutting method is particularly versatile as it can be used for plants in which leaf or petiole cuttings are not feasible, exhibiting a low risk of failure due to the development of axillary buds. The efficiency and reduced cultivation period of vegetative propagation are influenced by various environmental factors, such as the culture media, growth temperature, relative humidity, light intensity, light quality, soil moisture content, and the concentration of endogenous or exogenous phytohormones. Among these factors, phytohormones play a crucial role in regulating plant growth and development, exerting significant physiological effects even in minute quantities (Sosnowski et al. 2023).

Natural phytohormones, such as auxins, cytokinins, and gibberellic acid (GA), promote plant growth and development. In contrast, abscisic acid (ABA) significantly inhibits these processes, and ethylene is known for its role in fruit ripening (Nam et al. 2024). Among these, auxins, derived from the Greek word ‘auxein’ meaning ‘to grow’, are involved in almost all aspects of plant growth and development (Enders and Strader 2015; Dong and Huang 2018; Luo et al. 2018; Basunia and Nonhebel 2019; Tivendale and Millar 2022). Notably, auxins play a pivotal role in the development of adventitious roots, a critical process for plant propagation and stress adaptation (Meng et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2021b; Oh et al. 2023; Sekhukhune and Maila 2025). Auxins are found in plants, fungi, and microbes in nature and are known to play crucial roles as key regulators of plant growth and development by integrating abiotic stress signals and controlling downstream stress responses (Spaepen and Vanderleyden 2011; Keswani et al. 2020; Jing et al. 2023; Thakor et al. 2023).

Since the discovery of auxins in the 1930s, various propagation methods utilizing auxins, such as the basal quick-dip, powder application, and the dilute soak methods, have been developed, with the first two methods still widely used today (Blythe et al. 2007). Auxins exist in natural forms such as indole acetic acid (IAA), phenylacetic acid (PAA), and 4-chloroindole-3-acetic acid (4-Cl-IAA) and in synthetic forms such as 3-indolebutyric acid (IBA), 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) (Enders and Strader 2015). These forms are used not only to promote plant growth and development but also as herbicides (Mithila et al. 2011; Peterson et al. 2016).

Auxin-based rooting promoters, also known as auxinic rooting promoters, have been shown to be effective when used for stem cuttings in various species, such as Apocynum lancifolium (Seo et al. 2023), Echeveria spp. (Cabahug et al. 2016), Philodendron hederaceum var. oxycardium (Lee et al. 2024), Sageretia thea (Son et al. 2022), and Sedum takesimense (Oh and Lee 2022). Previous studies have investigated the effects of the dipping time on root formation (Wang et al. 2021a; Bak et al. 2023), with some focusing on different types of auxins and their varying rates of efficacy in promoting rooting (Kwon and Cho 2023; Lee et al. 2024). Others have explored foliar application methods for propagation and growth promotion (Blythe et al. 2004; Mir et al. 2020; Bowden et al. 2022; Jung et al. 2023). Given these factors, careful selection of auxin types, concentrations, and application methods is crucial, as they can significantly influence various aspects of plant growth and development depending on the species or cultivar (Lee et al. 2024). This highlights the need for diverse experimental approaches to achieve optimal results.

Most cutting experiments on the genus Hedera have focused on H. helix (Poulsen and Andersen 1980; Richardson and Humphries 1982). The physiological characteristics of H. algeriensis, commonly known as Algerian ivy, are largely unknown, with relevant studies being limited primarily to some morphological and taxonomic research (Ackerfield and Wen 2002; Valcárcel et al. 2003; Valcárcel and Vargas 2010). The variegated H. algeriensis cultivar, specifically ‘Gloire de Marengo’, which possesses a tricolor pattern, is distributed globally and is noted for its aesthetically appealing appearance and high demand. However, the optimal auxin concentration for the cuttings of this cultivar has not yet been determined. Thus, exploring auxinic rooting promoters is essential to enhance the propagation efficiency and morphophysiological characteristics of this cultivar.

Ornamental foliage plants such as ‘Gloire de Marengo’ are highly valued for their ability to enhance both indoor and outdoor environments, including homes, offices, gardens, and public spaces (Bermejo and Sparke 2018; Lee et al. 2021; Persiani 2021; Francini et al. 2022). Beyond their aesthetic appeal, these plants contribute to improving air quality levels by reducing fine dust and other airborne pollutants (Jeong et al. 2020, 2021), and they offer significant benefits to the physical and mental health of humans by creating more pleasant and stress-reducing environments (Deng and Deng 2018; Tao et al. 2020). The increasing demand for ornamental foliage plants such as ‘Gloire de Marengo’ underscores the importance of efficient propagation methods. Given the importance of preserving the distinct variegated traits of this cultivar, the use of auxinic rooting promoters in stem-cutting propagation is particularly advantageous. This approach not only overcomes the limitations associated with seed propagation, which can usually lead to a loss of variegation, but also enables the rapid, mass production necessary to meet market demands.

Therefore, in this study, H. algeriensis cv. Gloire de Marengo, a variegated ornamental foliage plant, serves as the experimental plant to investigate the effects of auxinic rooting promoters on the propagation efficiency and morphophysiological characteristics of its stem cuttings.

Materials and Methods

Experimental plants and environmental conditions

This study was conducted over four months, from February to June 2024, in the experimental greenhouse of the Department of Environmental Horticulture at Sahmyook University, located in Nowon-gu, Seoul, South Korea. The experimental greenhouse had a 25% shading level and was open on all sides.

The auxinic rooting promoters used in this study were 3-indolebutyric acid (IBA) and 1-naphthylacetic acid (NAA) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Nine concentrations were designed: control (T1), IBA at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1 (T2, T3, T4, and T5, respectively), and NAA at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1 (T6, T7, T8, and T9, respectively), based on the methods of Lee et al. (2024), with modifications to types and concentrations of auxinic rooting promoters in this study. All auxins used in this study were first dissolved in a small amount of 95% ethanol and then diluted with purified water until the final ethanol concentration reached 20% (Table 1). The control group consisted of 20% ethanol without any auxinic rooting promoter.

Table 1.

Concentrations and molarity values of the auxinic rooting promoters used in this study

Treatment symbolsz Auxinic rooting promoters Concentrations (mg·L-1) Molarity (mM)
T1 Control 0 0
T2 3-indolebutyric acid (IBA) 250 1.23
T3 500 2.46
T4 750 3.69
T5 1000 4.92
T6 1-naphthylacetic acid (NAA) 250 1.34
T7 500 2.69
T8 750 4.02
T9 1000 5.37

zThese treatments were based on methods of Lee et al. (2024), with modifications to types and concentrations of auxinic rooting promoters.

Rectangular pots measuring 48.5 × 33.0 × 8.0 cm (length × width × height) were used. The culture medium consisted of a 1:1:1 (v/v/v) mixture of a fertilized horticultural substrate (Hanareumsangto, Shinsung Mineral, South Korea), vermiculite (Verminuri, GFC, South Korea), and perlite (New Pearl Shine No. 1, GFC, South Korea). Stem cuttings were prepared from one-year-old ‘Gloire de Marengo’ plants, with each cutting consisting of a single 3 cm node, one axillary bud, and a single leaf to ensure uniformity in the experimental conditions. The dipping method involved immersing the bases of the stem cuttings to a depth of 5 mm for one minute. Watering was carried out twice a week, and liquid fertilizer with an N-P-K ratio of 7-10-6 (High Grade S, HYPONeX, Japan) was applied at a concentration of 1000 ppm once a month. During the study, the average temperature and relative humidity were 21.4 ± 3.9°C and 60.3 ± 12.5%, respectively.

Investigation of morphophysiological characteristics

To investigate the effects of auxinic rooting promoters on the propagation efficiency and morphophysiological characteristics of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem cuttings, various parameters were measured, in this case the survival rate, shooting and rooting success rates; shoot length and width, stem diameter; root length; ground cover; number of leaves, the leaf length, width, and area; the fresh weights of the shoots and roots; the dry weights of the shoots and roots; the total fresh and dry weights; the moisture content of the shoots and roots; the compactness index; the Dickson quality index (DQI); the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); the modified chlorophyll absorption ratio index (MCARI); the maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm); and the photosynthetic performance index (PIABS).

Plant sizes were measured following the methods described in Park et al. (2023a). To ensure accurate measurements, the shoot length was measured from the ground to the terminal bud of the plant after the shoot was completely straightened, i.e., contained no bends. The shoot width was measured as well after the shoot was completely straightened at the widest part when viewed from the front. Root length was determined by measuring the longest root. Dry weight was obtained after drying the samples at 85°C for 12 hours using a hot-air drying oven (HK-DO135F, Hankuk S&I, South Korea) and then weighing them.

To evaluate the moisture content and quality of the plants, the moisture content (Lee and Nam 2024) (Eq. 1), compactness index (Kim et al. 2016) (Eq. 2), and DQI (Dickson et al. 1960) (Eq. 3) were analyzed.

(1)
Moisturecontent=[(FW-DW)/FW]100
(2)
Compactness=SDWSL
(3)
DQI=(SD/SL+RDW/SDW)TDW

(FW, fresh weight; DW, dry weight; SDW, shoot dry weight; SL, shoot length; SD, stem diameter; RDW, root dry weight; TDW, total dry weight)

Remote sensing vegetation indices were measured using a portable device specialized for measuring vegetation indices (PolyPen RP 410, Photon Systems Instruments, Czech Republic). The relevant equations for the NDVI (Rouse et al. 1973) (Eq. 4) and MCARI (Daughtry et al. 2000) (Eq. 5) are given below. These indices were used to evaluate the physiological status of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ as influenced by the auxinic rooting promoters.

(4)
NDVI=(NIR-Red)/(NIR+Red)
(5)
MCARI=[(ρ700-ρ670)-0.2(ρ700-ρ550)](ρ700/ρ670)

A chlorophyll fluorescence analysis was conducted using a detachable dark-adapted leaf clip following the manufacturer’s guidelines. Newly expanded leaves were randomly selected from the stem cuttings, dark-adapted for 15 minutes (PSI 2024), and measured using a portable chlorophyll fluorescence meter (FluorPen FP 110/D, Photon Systems Instruments, Czech Republic). Two chlorophyll fluorescence parameters were evaluated to assess changes in the physiological status of photosystem II (PSII). The descriptions and equations used are based on work by Stirbet and Govindjee (2011) and on the PSI (2024) manufacturer’s guidelines, as described below.

The maximum quantum yield, represented by Fv/Fm (Eq. 6), and the photosynthetic performance index, PIABS (Eq. 7), which together indicate the overall vitality and efficiency of PSII, were investigated. Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were specifically obtained from the dark green areas of the tricolor leaf patterns while avoiding the light green and white patterns as well as the leaf veins.

(6)
FvFm=(Fm-Fo)Fm
(7)
PIABS=(RCABS)[ϕPo(1-ϕPo)][ψo(1-ψo)]

Statistical analysis

The experimental results were analyzed using SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute, USA) by means of a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Duncan’s multiple range test was applied for mean comparisons at a significance level of p < 0.05. The experimental design was a completely randomized design (CRD), with seven stem cuttings per replication and a total of five replications per treatment.

Results and Discussion

Survival and success rates

In the nursery industry, rooting promoters are applied to stem cuttings to induce the development of adventitious roots across a wide range of plant species and cultivars, with the aim of accelerating root growth and development in cuttings (Blythe et al. 2007; Crawford et al. 2016). Owing to their greater stability against heat and light degradation, both IBA and NAA are more effective compared to IAA in promoting adventitious root development (Chadwick and Kiplinger 1939). Therefore, these two auxins were used as auxinic rooting promoters in the present study. Recently, experiments involving the use of the basal quick-dip method and a foliar application, which are simple and promising propagation methods, have been conducted on plants of the genus Hedera (Blythe et al. 2004; Abu-Zahra et al. 2013). However, these studies are relatively less sophisticated and tend to provide limited information. In this study, we aim to address these gaps by systematically evaluating the effects of auxinic rooting promoters on the propagation efficiency and morphophysiological characteristics of H. algeriensis cv. Gloire de Marengo stem cuttings.

Photographic documentation from this study showing the growth evaluation of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem cuttings as influenced by different concentrations of auxinic rooting promoters is shown in Fig. 1. The results of this study showed that neither the type nor the concentration of auxins significantly influenced the survival rate of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem cuttings (Fig. 2A). Similarly, there were no significant differences in shooting success rates among the treatments (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the rooting success rate was lowest in the control (T1) group at 88.5%, whereas treatments T3–T5 (3-indolebutyric acid, IBA 500–1000 mg·L-1) and T7–T8 (1-naphthylacetic acid, NAA 500–750 mg·L-1) achieved a high rooting success rate of 100%, indicating that the use of auxinic rooting promoters was effective in promoting rooting in ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem cuttings (Fig. 2C).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2025-043-03/N020250032/images/HST_20250032_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Growth outcomes of Hedera algeriensis cv. Gloire de Marengo stem cuttings as influenced by auxinic rooting promoters at various concentrations after four months of growth. Control (T1) uses purified water with ethanol; T2, T3, T4, and T5 are treated with 3-indolebutyric acid (IBA) at concentrations of 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1, respectively; and T6, T7, T8, and T9 are treated with 1-naphthylacetic acid (NAA) at concentrations of 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1, respectively.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2025-043-03/N020250032/images/HST_20250032_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.

Survival rate and success rates of H. algeriensis cv. Gloire de Marengo stem cuttings as influenced by auxinic rooting promoters at various concentrations after four months of growth. A) survival rate; B) shooting success rate; and C) rooting success rate. T1 uses purified water with ethanol; T2, T3, T4, and T5 are treated with IBA at concentrations of 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1, respectively; and T6, T7, T8, and T9 are treated with NAA at concentrations of 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1, respectively. Means were derived from five replications (n = 5), each consisting of seven stem cuttings. Vertical bars indicate the mean ± standard error (SE), and asterisks (**) indicate significance at p < 0.01. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, while the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference at p > 0.05 based on Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT). NS indicates no significant difference.

It is well known that IBA and NAA promote the development of adventitious roots in cuttings (Sourati et al. 2022). In particular, IBA, an auxin precursor, regulates IAA levels through β-oxidation (Aryal et al. 2019). High IBA concentrations can stimulate cell division by activating mitotic genes that are generally regulated by auxins (Qu et al. 2019). However, to optimize rooting rates, the concentration of auxins should be adjusted according to the treatment method and species characteristics (Sourati et al. 2022). While the combination of IBA and NAA could also be considered for potentially enhancing rooting success, it is essential initially to gain a thorough understanding of their independent effects to determine the optimal conditions for each auxin.

In a previous study by El Malahi et al. (2024), Damask rose (Rosa × damascena), a floricultural crop, showed the highest rooting and survival rates at an IBA concentration of 1000 ppm among the tested levels (i.e., 0, 1000, and 10000 ppm). In contrast, Oh and Lee (2022) found that Sedum takesimense had the highest rooting and survival rates at IBA 250–500 mg·L-1 and NAA 500 mg·L-1. In the case of Hedera sp., Abu-Zahra et al. (2013) reported that the rooting rate was highest at an NAA concentration of 3000 ppm. On the other hand, Eucalyptus benthamii showed a positive response to rooting at a high concentration of IBA 2000 mg·L-1 (Brondani et al. 2012). However, Kwon and Cho (2023) reported no differences in the survival and rooting rates of Pseudolysimachion ovatum across different concentrations of auxinic rooting promoters, suggesting that the response to auxinic rooting promoters varies by species and cultivar.

Consequently, the ‘Gloire de Marengo’ cultivar demonstrated successful propagation via stem cuttings; however, compared to the control, the application of auxinic rooting promoters has been found to improve the rooting success rate significantly.

Morphophysiological analysis

In this study, we observed that among the parameters related to plant size, shoot length was longest in the T3 and T7 treatments, measuring 33.71 and 32.44 cm, respectively, while shoot width was widest in the T4 treatment (IBA 750 mg·L-1) at 16.41 cm (Table 2). Conversely, both shoot length and shoot width were shortest in the T1 treatment, measuring 19.63 and 12.40 cm, respectively. The stem diameter was thickest in the T4 and T8 treatments (at 0.32 cm) and thinnest in the T1 treatment (at 0.23 cm). Meanwhile, root length was longest in the T4, T5 (IBA 1000 mg·L-1), and T7 treatments, measuring 16.00, 15.94, and 15.71 cm, respectively. The ground cover was widest in the T4 and T5 treatments, measuring 270.4 and 273.7 cm2, respectively. Previous studies have shown that S. takesimense exhibits greater root length at IBA and NAA concentrations of 500 mg·L-1 (Oh and Lee 2022) and that P. ovatum exhibits greater root length compared to a control treatment regardless of the type and concentration of auxin used (Kwon and Cho 2023). Similarly, Abu-Zahra’s study (2013) reported that Hedera sp. achieved the longest root lengths at NAA concentrations of 3000–4000 ppm. These findings highlight the fact that both the type and concentration of auxin are critical factors when seeking to optimize root development across species.

Table 2.

Plant sizes and leaf growth parameters of Hedera algeriensis cv. Gloire de Marengo stem cuttings as influenced by auxinic rooting promoters at various concentrations after four months of growth

Treatment symbolsz Plant sizes (cm) Ground cover
(cm2)
Number of leaves Leaf sizes (cm) Leaf area (cm2)
Shoot length Shoot
width
Stem diameter Root
length
Length Width
T1 19.63 dy 12.40 c 0.23 b 8.08 c 160.6 c 4.1 c 7.08 d 6.69 c 47.4 d
T2 24.31 bcd 13.18 abc 0.30 ab 12.35 b 190.1 abc 5.5 ab 7.19 cd 7.25 abc 52.4 cd
T3 33.71 a 15.95 ab 0.31 ab 16.00 a 262.3 ab 6.5 ab 7.75 bcd 7.34 abc 56.7 bcd
T4 29.38 abc 16.41 a 0.32 a 15.94 a 270.4 a 6.2 ab 7.98 bc 7.57 ab 60.2 abc
T5 23.84 bcd 16.18 ab 0.31 ab 14.65 ab 273.7 a 5.5 ab 8.87 a 7.60 ab 67.8 a
T6 23.24 cd 13.15 abc 0.28 ab 14.48 ab 179.0 bc 5.1 bc 7.34 cd 7.39 abc 54.6 cd
T7 32.44 a 15.08 abc 0.30 ab 15.71 a 228.6 abc 7.1 a 8.30 ab 7.94 a 65.8 ab
T8 30.37 ab 13.72 abc 0.32 a 14.93 ab 190.5 abc 6.8 ab 7.62 bcd 7.09 abc 54.3 cd
T9 28.37 abc 13.01 bc 0.28 ab 15.35 ab 171.2 c 6.7 ab 7.21 cd 6.98 bc 50.6 cd
Significancex *** * * *** * ** *** * ***

zControl (T1) uses purified water with ethanol; T2, T3, T4, and T5 are treated with 3-indolebutyric acid (IBA) at concentrations of 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1, respectively; and T6, T7, T8, and T9 are treated with 1-naphthylacetic acid (NAA) at concentrations of 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1, respectively.

yMeans separation within columns according to Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at p < 0.05 (n = 5).

x*, **, and ***: significant at p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively.

Among the parameters related to the leaf size, the number of leaves was highest in the T7 treatment at 7.1 leaves and was lowest in the T1 treatment at 4.1 leaves. Meanwhile, leaf length and width were highest in the T5 and T7 treatments, measuring 8.87 and 7.94 cm, respectively, while the T1 treatment had the lowest values at 7.08 and 6.69 cm, respectively. Leaf area was greatest in the T5 treatment at 67.8 cm2.

Thus, the use of auxinic rooting promoters showed significant positive effects on parameters related to plant size. Although the optimal type and concentration of auxin varied for different parts of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem cuttings, the influence was positive with regard to the overall increase in the plant size parameters.

In previous studies by Wang et al. (2019, 2024), auxins were suggested to be involved in the photosynthetic efficiency of plants and to play a crucial role in biomass accumulation. However, this may be a complex outcome arising from the overall growth rate improvement owing to the promotion of root development by auxins, necessitating sufficient consideration of various growth factors (Tivendale and Millar 2022). The results regarding biomass revealed that the shoot fresh weight ranged from 7.73 to 8.13 g in the T3–T5 treatments and from 8.05 to 9.04 g in the T7–T9 treatments, indicating a high shoot fresh weight at concentrations of 500–1000 mg·L-1 regardless of the types of auxins used (Fig. 3A). However, root fresh weight was highest in the T7 treatment at 1.50 g. Shoot dry weight was heaviest in T3 and T7 treatments, measuring 1.55 and 1.61 g, respectively (Fig. 3B). Meanwhile, root dry weight was lowest in the T1 treatment (at 0.12 g), with no significant differences observed between the T2–T9 treatments. The total fresh weight followed a pattern similar to that of the shoot fresh weight, being heavier in the T3–T5 and T7–T9 treatments (Fig. 3C). The total dry weight was heaviest in T3 and T7 treatments, measuring 1.87 and 1.95 g, respectively, while the T1 treatment had the lowest total dry weight at 0.83 g. Regarding the moisture content, there were no statistically significant differences in the moisture contents of the shoots and roots of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem cuttings treated with various types and concentrations of auxinic rooting promoters (Fig. 3D). Consequently, the biomass results, similar to those related to the plant size, exhibited complex outcomes based on the type and concentration of auxinic rooting promoters, with the T3 and T7 treatments showing relatively high biomass outcomes.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2025-043-03/N020250032/images/HST_20250032_F3.jpg
Fig. 3.

Plant biomass and moisture content of H. algeriensis cv. Gloire de Marengo stem cuttings as influenced by auxinic rooting promoters at various concentrations after four months of growth. A) fresh weights; B) dry weights; C) total weights; and D) moisture content. T1 uses purified water with ethanol; T2, T3, T4, and T5 are treated with IBA at concentrations of 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1, respectively; and T6, T7, T8, and T9 are treated with NAA at concentrations of 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1, respectively. Means were derived from five replications (n = 5), each consisting of seven stem cuttings. Vertical bars indicate the mean ± SE, and asterisks (** and ***) indicate significance at p < 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05, while the same lowercase letters indicate no significant difference at p > 0.05, based on DMRT. NS indicates no significant difference.

The compactness index of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem cuttings was highest in the T3 and T7 treatments, with values of 52.18 and 51.56, respectively (Fig. 4A). The DQI was lowest in the T1 treatment at 0.158, whereas it ranged from 0.361 to 0.450 across the other treatments, showing no significant differences regardless of the types and concentrations of auxinic rooting promoters used (Fig. 4B). Therefore, with regard to shoot growth, it was evident that the T3 and T7 treatments exhibited a high biomass density relative to the shoot length and shoot dry weight. From a broader perspective, all treatments except for the T1 treatment demonstrated relatively superior growth conditions for stem cuttings, indicating improved growth performance overall.

Among the methods used to assess plant physiological status, remote sensing vegetation indices and chlorophyll fluorescence analyses are widely utilized as non-destructive (or non-invasive) methods (Jang et al. 2023). These methods have been applied extensively in studies investigating plant physiological conditions (Kawakatsu and Fukuda 2023; Nam et al. 2023; Zheng et al. 2023; Lin et al. 2024). Such techniques are particularly effective for providing real-time data on plant health and stress responses, making them indispensable in studies focused on optimizing cutting propagation techniques (Kwon et al. 2023; Lee et al. 2024), enhancing growth and development (Guo et al. 2023; Shin et al. 2023; Kim et al. 2024b), and improving overall plant qualities (Ahn et al. 2024; Kim et al. 2024a, 2024c; Park et al. 2024).

One of the remote sensing vegetation indices, NDVI, was found to be high under the T3, T7, and T8 treatments, measuring 0.696, 0.702, and 0.694, respectively (Fig. 4C). Conversely, the NDVI values were lower in the T1, T5, and T6 treatments, with corresponding values of 0.620, 0.627, and 0.634. These results suggest that the use of auxinic rooting promoters positively influences the vegetation index of plants produced from stem cuttings and that excessively low or high auxin concentrations result in lower vegetation indices. This is in line with a previous study by Oh and Lee (2022), which reported that S. takesimense exhibited the lowest NDVI in the T1 treatment but showed higher NDVI values at IBA concentrations of 250–500 mg·L-1 and NAA concentration of 500 mg·L-1. Notably, NDVI values significantly decreased at a NAA concentration of 1000 mg·L-1, underscoring the importance of determining the optimal concentrations of exogenous auxins.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2025-043-03/N020250032/images/HST_20250032_F4.jpg
Fig. 4.

Plant growth quality indices, remote sensing vegetation indices, and chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of H. algeriensis cv. Gloire de Marengo stem cuttings as influenced by auxinic rooting promoters at various concentrations after four months of growth. A) compactness; B) Dickson quality index (DQI); C) normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI); D) modified chlorophyll absorption ratio index (MCARI); E) maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm); and F) photosynthetic performance index (PIABS). T1 uses purified water with ethanol; T2, T3, T4, and T5 are treated with IBA at concentrations of 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1, respectively; and T6, T7, T8, and T9 are treated with NAA at concentrations of 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1, respectively. Means were derived from five replications (n = 5), each consisting of seven stem cuttings. Vertical bars indicate the mean ± SE, and asterisks (*, **, and ***) indicate significance at p < 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 based on DMRT.

MCARI was highest in the T1 treatment at 0.458 (Fig. 4D). MCARI is determined by the reflectance of the ground and the chlorophyll content of leaves and is generally inversely related to chlorophyll content (Nagler et al. 2000). Consequently, it was inferred that the T1 treatment had relatively lower chlorophyll content than the other treatments, except for the T6 treatment. Plants treated with exogenous auxins may exhibit either an increase or decrease in chlorophyll content or MCARI values, depending on the species. Previous studies have reported that auxins inhibit chlorophyll accumulation in Arabidopsis (Luo et al. 2023), whereas in crops such as wheat and soybeans, auxins positively influence chlorophyll content (Aldesuquy 2000; Gadallah 2000; Sosnowski et al. 2023). Considering the findings of this study and the results reported by Lee et al. (2024), the growth promotion observed in the auxin-treated stem cuttings is presumed to have a positive effect on chlorophyll content. As previously mentioned, initial chlorophyll content or MCARI values may vary depending on the treatment, but in the long term, chlorophyll content is expected to increase while MCARI values decrease.

In light of these findings, it appears that the use of auxinic rooting promoters positively influences the chlorophyll content in the stem cuttings of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ cultivar. However, further studies involving long-term and periodic monitoring of changes in chlorophyll content and MCARI values are necessary.

In the analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence responses, the maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (PSII) (Fv/Fm) was high under the T3, T7, and T8 treatments, measuring 0.796, 0.797, and 0.798, respectively (Fig. 4E). According to previous studies, an Fv/Fm range of 0.780–0.840 indicates that higher plants are not under stress (Björkman and Demmig 1987; Yoo et al. 2012; Asadi-Sanam et al. 2015; Park et al. 2023b). This Fv/Fm value is a valuable tool for assessing the stress status of cuttings, as cuttings with poor rooting may exhibit lower Fv/Fm values due to water stress. It serves as an effective tool for estimating the rooting potential of cuttings, allowing for a more accurate assessment of their physiological performance and likelihood of successful root development without physically interfering with the plants. In the present study, treatments T1 and T5 exhibited Fv/Fm values of 0.771 and 0.775, respectively, slightly below the normal range. McAdam et al. (2017) highlighted the significant potential of auxins as key developmental determinants of maximum leaf gas exchange, contributing to increased plant productivity. Therefore, the application of optimal concentrations of exogenous auxins is likely to improve the photosynthetic efficiency of the cuttings. The results of this study indicate that the use of auxinic rooting promoters increased the maximum quantum yield of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ cuttings, significantly improving the activity of the reaction centers of PSII. However, using relatively high concentrations of IBA, as observed in the T5 treatment, negatively influenced the maximum quantum yield, consistent with findings by Oh and Lee (2022).

The performance index (PIABS), a chlorophyll fluorescence parameter that indicates photosynthetic performance (Dai et al. 2019), is highly useful for assessing the overall physiological status of plants (Lee 2023). In agreement with the results observed for biomass, plant growth quality indices, and remote sensing vegetation indices, PIABS was highest in the T7 treatment at 3.29, whereas it was lowest in the T1 treatment at 1.75 (Fig. 4F). These findings suggest that the T1 treatment, with its relatively slow development of organs such as roots, likely experienced stress (Park et al. 2017). Delayed development of organs such as roots can lead to abiotic forms of stress, such as water stress, which in turn reduces photosynthesis, inactivates photosynthetic regulatory enzymes, and causes photoinhibition damage, thereby compromising the physiological health of plants (Medrano et al. 1997). The highest PIABS in the T7 treatment, which was found to have the best plant growth conditions, aligns with existing research reports showing that high PIABS values are correlated with healthy plant growth (Lee 2023; Sung et al. 2023; Lee and Nam 2024; Shin et al. 2024). Consequently, this implies that the significant promotion of growth in ‘Gloire de Marengo’ cuttings due to auxinic rooting promoters also elevated the performance index. Overall, optimal concentrations of auxinic rooting promoters were shown to provide considerable advantages in improving the physiological characteristics of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem cuttings.

In summary compared to the T1 treatment, the use of auxinic rooting promoters was found to be beneficial in that it improved the morphophysiological characteristics of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem cuttings. Specifically, by synthesizing the results of biomass, several growth quality indices, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, and remote sensing vegetation indices, it was found that a concentration of 500 mg·L-1 NAA most effectively improved the morphophysiological characteristics of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem cuttings, followed by a concentration of 500 mg·L-1 IBA.

These findings provide valuable insights into the optimal concentration settings of auxinic rooting promoters and offer crucial guidance for improving the propagation efficiency and morphophysiological characteristics of ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem cuttings. Future studies should focus on investigating the effects of the dipping time on this cultivar, as well as exploring combinations of different types of auxins and the potential benefits of foliar application methods. These approaches could further optimize propagation techniques, improve the overall quality of the propagated plants, and enhance the efficiency of mass production for ‘Gloire de Marengo.’ Additionally, expanding this research to similar species or cultivars could provide broader insights into the generalizability and application of these findings in other horticultural contexts.

Conclusions

This study was conducted to improve the propagation efficiency and morphophysiological characteristics of the variegated ornamental foliage plant H. algeriensis cv. Gloire de Marengo through stem cuttings using different types and concentrations of auxinic rooting promoters. Nine concentrations of auxinic rooting promoters were used: control; IBA at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1; and NAA at 250, 500, 750, and 1000 mg·L-1. In terms of the plant size, different concentrations of auxinic rooting promoters yielded varying results, with the use of IBA and NAA proving advantageous for producing larger plants than the control treatment. With regard to biomass, the shoot dry weight was highest at 500 mg·L-1 for both IBA and NAA, and the root dry weight was significantly higher regardless of the type and concentration of the auxinic rooting promoter used, compared to the control treatment. Overall, the total dry weight followed a pattern similar to that of the shoot dry weight, with both IBA 500 mg·L-1 and NAA 500 mg·L-1 being the most effective concentrations. Although the moisture content did not show significant differences among the treatments, the compactness index exhibited a trend similar to that of shoot dry weight and total dry weight, with this pattern being particularly evident in the IBA 500 mg·L-1 and NAA 500 mg·L-1 treatments. Furthermore, the DQI was higher for all treatments except for the control treatment, indicating that the use of auxinic rooting promoters could effectively improve plant quality levels during stem-cutting propagation of this cultivar. NDVI and the maximum quantum yield (Fv/Fm) were highest at IBA 500 mg·L-1 and NAA 500 and 750 mg·L-1, indicating superior physiological responses in these treatments. The MCARI and PIABS values were highest in the control and NAA 500 mg·L-1 treatments, respectively. This suggests a relatively low chlorophyll content in the control treatment and indicates that the use of NAA at a concentration of 500 mg·L-1 improves the integrity of the photosynthetic apparatus during stem-cutting propagation compared to the other treatments. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest that the most effective concentration for ‘Gloire de Marengo’ stem-cutting propagation is NAA 500 mg·L-1, followed by IBA 500 mg·L-1. Future studies should focus on investigating the effects of the dipping time on this cultivar and on exploring combinations of different types of auxins and discussing the potential benefits of foliar application methods. These approaches could further optimize propagation techniques, improve the overall quality of the propagated plants, and provide valuable insights into increasing the efficiency of the mass production of ‘Gloire de Marengo’.

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the Sahmyook University Research Fund in 2024.

References

1

Abu-Zahra TR, Al-Shadaideh AN, Abubaker SM, Qrunfleh IM (2013) Influence of auxin concentrations on different ornamental plants rooting. Int J Bot 9:96-99. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijb.2013.96.99

10.3923/ijb.2013.96.99
2

Ackerfield J, Wen J (2002) A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24:197-212

3

Ahn JJ, Kim EA, Shin EJ, Sunwoo Y, Lee JH, Nam SY (2024) Shading treatments affect the growth characteristics, ornamental value, and photosynthetic activities of various Peperomia species and cultivars. Glasilo Future 7:1-19. https://doi.org/10.32779/gf.7.2-3.1

10.32779/gf.7.2-3.1
4

Aldesuquy HS (2000) Effect of indol-3-yl acetic acid on photosynthetic characteristics of wheat flag leaf during grain filling. Photosynthetica 38:135-141. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026712428094

10.1023/A:1026712428094
5

Aryal B, Huynh J, Schneuwly J, Siffert A, Liu J, Alejandro S, Liu J, Alejandro S, Ludwig-Müller J, et al. (2019) ABCG36/PEN3/PDR8 is an exporter of the auxin precursor, indole-3-butyric acid, and involved in auxin-controlled development. Front Plant Sci 10:899. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00899/full

10.3389/fpls.2019.0089931354769PMC6629959
6

Asadi-Sanam S, Pirdashti H, Hashempour A, Zavareh M, Nematzadeh GA, Yaghoubian Y (2015) The physiological and biochemical responses of eastern purple coneflower to freezing stress. Russ J Plant Physiol 62:515-523. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1021443715040056

10.1134/S1021443715040056
7

Bak S, Lim WJ, Lim J, Kim JS, Han TH (2023) Effect of indole-3-butyric acid treatment duration on rooting in Hydrangea paniculata cuttings, and observation of stem cell structure. Flower Res J 31:194-203. https://doi.org/10.11623/frj.2023.31.4.02

10.11623/frj.2023.31.4.02
8

Basunia MA, Nonhebel HM (2019) Hormonal regulation of cereal endosperm development with a focus on rice (Oryza sativa). Funct Plant Biol 46:493-506. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP18323

10.1071/FP1832330955506
9

Bermejo G, Sparke K (2018) Happier in a home with plants? a study on the relationship between human wellbeing and ornamental plants in private households. Acta Hortic 1258:47-54. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1258.7

10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1258.7
10

Björkman O, Demmig B (1987) Photon yield of O2 evolution and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics at 77 K among vascular plants of diverse origins. Planta 170:489-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00402983

10.1007/BF0040298324233012
11

Blythe EK, Sibley JL, Ruter JM, Tilt KM (2004) Cutting propagation of foliage crops using a foliar application of auxin. Sci Hortic 103:31-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2004.04.011

10.1016/j.scienta.2004.04.011
12

Blythe EK, Sibley JL, Tilt KM, Ruter JM (2007) Methods of auxin application in cutting propagation: a review of 70 years of scientific discovery and commercial practice. J Environ Hortic 25:166-185. https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-25.3.166

10.24266/0738-2898-25.3.166
13

Bowden AT, Knight PR, Ryals JB, Coker CE, Langlois SA, Broderick SR, Blythe EK, Sakhanokho HF, Babiker EM (2022) Evaluation of one-time applications of foliar applied auxin co-applied with surfactant for use in commercial cutting propagation. Agronomy 12:2243. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102243

10.3390/agronomy12102243
14

Brondani GE, Baccarin FJB, de Wit Ondas HW, Stape JL, Gonçalves AN, Almeida MD (2012) Low temperature, IBA concentrations and optimal time for adventitious rooting of Eucalyptus benthamii mini-cuttings. J For Res 23:583-592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-012-0298-5

10.1007/s11676-012-0298-5
15

Cabahug RA, Soh SY, Nam SY (2016) Effects of auxin and cytokinin application on leaf cutting propagation in Echeveria species. Flower Res J 24:264-273. https://doi.org/10.11623/frj.2016.24.4.04

10.11623/frj.2016.24.4.04
16

Chadwick LC, Kiplinger DC (1939) The effect of synthetic growth substances on the rooting and subsequent growth of ornamental plants. Bi-m Bull Ohio Agric Exp Stn 24:89-95

17

Crawford BD, Dole JM, Bergmann BA (2016) Influences of season and cutting week within a propagation cycle on rooting of 'Stained Glass' coleus shoot tip cuttings are not overcome by rooting compound treatment. HortTechnology 26:620-627. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTTECH03464-16

10.21273/HORTTECH03464-16
18

Dai Y, Yuan L, Zhang S, Wang J, Xie S, Zhao M, Chen G, Sun R, Wang C (2019) Comprehensive evaluation for cold tolerance in wucai (Brassica campestris L.) by the performance index on an absorption basis (PIabs). Agronomy 9:61. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9020061

10.3390/agronomy9020061
19

Daughtry CS, Walthall CL, Kim MS, De Colstoun EB, McMurtrey III JE (2000) Estimating corn leaf chlorophyll concentration from leaf and canopy reflectance. Remote Sens Environ 74:229-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00113-9

10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00113-9
20

Deng L, Deng Q (2018) The basic roles of indoor plants in human health and comfort. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:36087-36101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3554-1

10.1007/s11356-018-3554-130387059
21

Dickson A, Leaf AL, Hosner JF (1960) Quality appraisal of white spruce and white pine seedling stock in nurseries. For Chron 36:10-13. https://doi.org/10.5558/tfc36010-1

10.5558/tfc36010-1
22

Dong J, Huang H (2018) Auxin polar transport flanking incipient primordium initiates leaf adaxial-abaxial polarity patterning. J Integr Plant Biol 60:455-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12640

10.1111/jipb.1264029405646
23

El Malahi S, Sbah N, Zim J, Ennami M, Zakri B, Mokhtari W, Taimourya H, Mokhtari M, Hassani LMI (2024) Enhancing rooting efficiency and nutrient uptake in Rosa damascena Mill. cuttings: insights into auxin and cutting type optimization. Plant Sci Today 11:119-131. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2585

10.14719/pst.2585
24

Enders TA, Strader LC (2015) Auxin activity: past, present, and future. Am J Bot 102:180-196. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400285

10.3732/ajb.140028525667071PMC4854432
25

Francini A, Romano D, Toscano S, Ferrante A (2022) The contribution of ornamental plants to urban ecosystem services. Earth 3:1258-1274. https://doi.org/10.3390/earth3040071

10.3390/earth3040071
26

Gadallah MAA (2000) Effects of indole-3-acetic acid and zinc on the growth, osmotic potential and soluble carbon and nitrogen components of soybean plants growing under water deficit. J Arid Environ 44:451-467. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.1999.0610

10.1006/jare.1999.0610
27

Guo Y, Zhong Y, Mo L, Zhang W, Chen Y, Wang YC, Chen H, Wang Z, Song X, et al. (2023) Different combinations of red and blue LED light affect the growth, physiology metabolism and photosynthesis of in vitro-cultured Dendrobium nobile 'Zixia'. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 64:393-407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-022-00491-x

10.1007/s13580-022-00491-x
28

Jang IT, Lee JH, Shin EJ, Nam SY (2023) Evaluation of growth, flowering, and chlorophyll fluorescence responses of Viola cornuta cv. Penny Red Wing according to spectral power distributions. J People Plants Environ 26:335-349. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.4.335

10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.4.335
29

Jeong NR, Kim JH, Han SW, Kim JC, Kim WY (2021) Assessment of the particulate matter reduction potential of climbing plants on green walls for air quality management. J People Plants Environ 24:377-387. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2021.24.4.377

10.11628/ksppe.2021.24.4.377
30

Jeong NR, Kim KJ, Yoon JH, Han SW, You S (2020) Evaluation on the potential of 18 species of indoor plants to reduce particulate matter. J People Plants Environ 23:637-646. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2020.23.6.637

10.11628/ksppe.2020.23.6.637
31

Jing H, Wilkinson EG, Sageman-Furnas K, Strader LC (2023) Auxin and abiotic stress responses. J Exp Bot 74:7000-7014. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erad325

10.1093/jxb/erad32537591508PMC10690732
32

Jung HH, Kim SJ, Yang GR, Lee YR (2023) Effect of the K-IBA foliar application on the rooting of geraldton waxflower 'Mars' and 'Early Nir' semi-hardwood cuttings. Hortic Sci Technol 41:45-58. https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20230005

10.7235/HORT.20230005
33

Kawakatsu T, Fukuda N (2023) Dense planting and environmental control (temperature, light intensity, and concentration of nutrient solution) can increase the yield of ginseng (Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer) seedlings in indoor cultivation with artificial light. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 64:571-582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-022-00506-7

10.1007/s13580-022-00506-7
34

Keswani C, Singh SP, Cueto L, García-Estrada C, Mezaache-Aichour S, Glare TR, Borriss R, Singh SP, Blázquez MA, et al. (2020) Auxins of microbial origin and their use in agriculture. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 104:8549-8565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-020-10890-8

10.1007/s00253-020-10890-832918584
35

Kim EA, Lee JH, Nam SY (2024a) Differences in growth characteristics and photochemical responses of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge under different LED light qualities in a closed plant factory system. Korean J Med Crop Sci 32:189-201. https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2024.32.4.189

10.7783/KJMCS.2024.32.4.189
36

Kim EA, Lee JH, Shin EJ, Ahn JJ, Nam SY (2024b) Investigation of germination success, post-germination growth, and physiological characteristics of Betula platyphylla var. japonica seeds subjected to various short-term dry-cold treatment periods. J Agric Life Environ Sci 36:217-231. https://doi.org/10.22698/jales.20240018

37

Kim EA, Lee JH, Sunwoo Y, Shin EJ, Nam SY (2024c) Improvement in growth, external quality, and physiological characteristics of Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge through photoperiod control. Korean J Med Crop Sci 32:152-162. https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2024.32.3.152

10.7783/KJMCS.2024.32.3.152
38

Kim HJ, Kim YJ (2015) Effect of shading degree and rooting media on growth of cuttings in Caragana sinica (Buc'hoz) Rehder and Sedum middendorffianum Maxim. Korean J Med Crop Sci 23:271-276 https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2015.23.4.271

10.7783/KJMCS.2015.23.4.271
39

Kim HM, Kim YJ, Hwang SJ (2016) Optimum wattage and installation height of nano-carbon fiber infrared heating lamp for heating energy saving in plug seedling production greenhouse in winter season. Protected Hortic Plant Fac 25:302-307. https://doi.org/10.12791/KSBEC.2016.25.4.302

10.12791/KSBEC.2016.25.4.302
40

Kwon AR, Jang WS, Kim SI, Seong BJ, Guak SH (2023) Effect of soil water status on growth, photosynthesis, and antioxidant enzyme activity in Rehmannia glutinosa var.'Togang'. Korean J Med Crop Sci 31:235-246. https://doi.org/10.7783/KJMCS.2023.31.4.235

10.7783/KJMCS.2023.31.4.235
41

Kwon HH, Cho W (2023) Effects of external treatment of auxins, substrate type, leaf attachment, and leaf cutting on stem cutting of Pseudolysimachion ovatum (NaKai) T. Yamaz. Flower Res J 31:253-259. https://doi.org/10.11623/frj.2023.31.4.08

10.11623/frj.2023.31.4.08
42

Lee JH (2023) Effects of light quality, temperature, photoperiod, and GA3 concentration on growth of six Phedimus species. Ph.D. dissertation, Sahmyook University, Seoul, South Korea

43

Lee JH, Cabahug RAM, You NH, Nam SY (2021) Chlorophyll fluorescence and growth evaluation of ornamental foliage plants in response to light intensity levels under continuous lighting conditions. Flower Res J 29:153-164. https://doi.org/10.11623/frj.2021.29.3.05

10.11623/frj.2021.29.3.05
44

Lee JH, Nam SY (2024) growth and photosynthetic responses of Taraxacum coreanum Nakai seedlings according to the shading levels. Hortic Sci Technol 42:214-224. https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20240018

10.7235/HORT.20240018
45

Lee JH, Shin EJ, Kim EA, Jang IT, Lee S, Nam SY (2024) Effects of different concentrations of exogenous auxins (IAA, IBA, and NAA) on growth and rooting ability of Philodendron hederaceum var. oxycardium (Schott) Croat stem cuttings. J People Plants Environ 27:279-289. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2024.27.4.279

10.11628/ksppe.2024.27.4.279
46

Lin KH, Chen SP, Su YR, Tsai YH, Lin HH (2024) Waterlogging influences the physiology index and antioxidant enzyme activity in Cucurbita maxima and Cucurbita moschata. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 65:43-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-023-00552-9

10.1007/s13580-023-00552-9
47

Luo J, Zhou JJ, Zhang JZ (2018) Aux/IAA gene family in plants: molecular structure, regulation, and function. Int J Mol Sci 19:259. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19010259

10.3390/ijms1901025929337875PMC5796205
48

Luo WG, Liang QW, Su Y, Huang C, Mo BX, Yu Y, Xiao LT (2023) Auxin inhibits chlorophyll accumulation through ARF7-IAA14-mediated repression of chlorophyll biosynthesis genes in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci 14:1172059. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1172059

10.3389/fpls.2023.117205937152161PMC10157223
49

Matsuo E, Matsuzawa M, Sakata Y, Arisumi K (1989) Asexual propagation of variegated Lilium longiflorum 'Chotaro'. Sci Hortic 39:349-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4238(89)90128-3

10.1016/0304-4238(89)90128-3
50

McAdam SA, Eléouët MP, Best M, Brodribb TJ, Murphy MC, Cook SD, Dalmais M, Dimitriou T, Gélinas-Marion A, et al. (2017) Linking auxin with photosynthetic rate via leaf venation. Plant Physiol 175:351-360. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00535

10.1104/pp.17.0053528733387PMC5580753
51

Medrano H, Parry MAJ, Socias XDWL, Lawlor DW (1997) Long term water stress inactivates Rubisco in subterranean clover. Ann Appl Biol 131:491-501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1997.tb05176.x

10.1111/j.1744-7348.1997.tb05176.x
52

Meng X, Wang Z, He S, Shi L, Song Y, Lou X, He D (2019) Endogenous hormone levels and activities of IAA-modifying enzymes during adventitious rooting of tree peony cuttings and grafted scions. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 60:187-197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-018-00121-5

10.1007/s13580-018-00121-5
53

Mir AR, Siddiqui H, Alam P, Hayat S (2020) Foliar spray of auxin/IAA modulates photosynthesis, elemental composition, ROS localization and antioxidant machinery to promote growth of Brassica juncea. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 26:2503-2520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00914-y

10.1007/s12298-020-00914-y33424161PMC7772134
54

Mithila J, Hall JC, Johnson WG, Kelley KB, Riechers DE (2011) Evolution of resistance to auxinic herbicides: historical perspectives, mechanisms of resistance, and implications for broadleaf weed management in agronomic crops. Weed Sci 59:445-457. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00062.1

10.1614/WS-D-11-00062.1
55

Nagler PL, Daughtry CST, Goward SN (2000) Plant litter and soil reflectance. Remote Sens Environ 71:229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00082-6

10.1016/S0034-4257(99)00082-6
56

Nam S, Hong C, An SK, Kim J (2023) Low substrate water content is efficient for the performance of Ficus pumila 'Variegata' indoors. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 64:583-591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-023-00514-1

10.1007/s13580-023-00514-1
57

Nam SY, Park SK, Lee JH, Jang IT (2024) Introductory horticulture 3rd edition. RGB press, Seoul, Korea

58

Oh SI, Lee AK (2022) Effect of rooting promoter treatments on cutting and growth of Sedum takesimense. Hortic Sci Technol 40:12-20. https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20220002

10.7235/HORT.20220002
59

Oh SI, Park EH, Koh HM, Gil M, Yoon MJ, Bae JK, Ko CH (2023) propagation characteristics of the rare endemic Rhododenderon micranthum Turcz. Horticulturae 9:101. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9010101

10.3390/horticulturae9010101
60

Park BG, Lee JH, Shin EJ, Kim EA, Nam SY (2024) Light quality influence on growth performance and physiological activity of Coleus cultivars. Int J Plant Biol 15:807-826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb15030058

10.3390/ijpb15030058
61

Park J, Kim JS, Kim D (2017) The change of somatic cell embryogenesis in Kalanchoe pinnata because of agar concentration in stimulating root stress. J Plant Biotechnol 44:320-324. https://doi.org/10.5010/JPB.2017.44.3.320

10.5010/JPB.2017.44.3.320
62

Park SH, Lee JH, Nam SY (2023a) An analysis of the growth and photosynthetic responses of potted Veronica pusanensis Y.N.Lee according to the shading levels. J People Plants Environ 26:219-231. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.3.219

10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.3.219
63

Park SH, Park HG, Kwon HH, Lee KM (2023b) Assessment of adequate volumetric water content for managing Farfugium japonicum (L.) Kitam. in the indoor gardens. 26:749-759. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.6.749

10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.6.749
64

Persiani SG (2021) Benefits of using plants in indoor environments: exploring common research gaps. Architecture 1:83-98. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture1020008

10.3390/architecture1020008
65

Peterson MA, McMaster SA, Riechers DE, Skelton J, Stahlman PW (2016) 2,4-D past, present, and future: a review. Weed Technol 30:303-345. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-D-15-00131.1

10.1614/WT-D-15-00131.1
66

Photon Systems Instruments (PSI) (2024) FluorPen FP 110 PAR-FluorPen FP 110 Monitoring Pen MP 100. FluorPen & PAR FluorPen, Photon Systems Instruments website. Available via https://handheld.psi.cz/documents/FluorPen_Monitoring_Manual_02_2021.pdf Accessed 12 July 2024

67

Poulsen A, Andersen AS (1980) Propagation of Hedera helix: influence of irradiance to stock plants, length of internode and topophysis of cutting. Physiol Plant 49:359-365. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1980.tb03317.x

10.1111/j.1399-3054.1980.tb03317.x
68

Qu Y, Liu X, Zhang X, Tang Y, Hu Y, Chen S, Xiang L, Zhang Q (2019) Transcriptional regulation of Arabidopsis copper amine oxidase ζ (CuAOζ) in indole-3-butyric acid-induced lateral root development. Plant Growth Regul 89:287-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-019-00535-w

10.1007/s10725-019-00535-w
69

Ranawana SRWMCJK, Eeswara JP (2008) Effects of type and size of stem cutting and propagation media for rapid multiplication of pineapple (Ananas comosus). Trop Agric Res 20:388-394

70

Richardson SA, Humphries RN (1982) The rooting of the juvenile form of Hedera helix L. from shoot cuttings. Sci Hortic 33:136-139

71

Rouse JW, Haas RH, Schell JA, Deering DW (1973) Monitoring vegetation systems in the Great Plains with ERTS. 3rd ERTS Symposium, NASA SP-351, Washington DC, USA, pp 309-317

72

Sekhukhune MK, Maila YM (2025) Growth regulator indole-3-butyric acid on rooting potential of Actinidia deliciosa rootstock and Actinidia arguta female scion species stem cuttings. Horticulturae 11:53. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae11010053

10.3390/horticulturae11010053
73

Seo JM, Shin JW, Park CR, Kim YE, Lee JW, Baek SG, Kim JM, Kim JH, Ahn CH (2023) Effect of propagation media and plant growth regulators on adventitious rooting of softwood cuttings of Apocynum lancifolium Russanov. J People Plants Environ 26:805-812. https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.6.805

10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.6.805
74

Shin EJ, Lee JH, Nam SY (2023) Changes in growth, visual qualities, and photosynthetic parameters in Peperomia species and cultivars under different color temperatures of white lighting conditions. J Agric Life Environ Sci 35:307-321. https://doi.org/10.22698/jales.20230025

10.22698/jales.20230025
75

Shin EJ, Lee JH, Nam SY (2024) Evaluation of growth, vegetation indices, and photosynthesis of Cichorium intybus L. seedlings as affected by LED light qualities in a closed nursery facility. Hortic Sci Technol 42:350-364. https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20240029

10.7235/HORT.20240029
76

Son Y, Park S, Son H, Kim JA, Cho H, Lee SY, Kim HJ (2022) Rooting characteristics of Sageretia thea by cutting time, rooting medium and plant growth regulators. Korean J Plant Resour 35:667-674. https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2022.35.5.667

10.7732/kjpr.2022.35.5.667
77

Sosnowski J, Truba M, Vasileva V (2023) The impact of auxin and cytokinin on the growth and development of selected crops. Agriculture 13:724. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture13030724

10.3390/agriculture13030724
78

Sourati R, Sharifi P, Poorghasemi M, Alves Vieira E, Seidavi A, Anjum NA, Sehar Z, Sofo A (2022) Effects of naphthaleneacetic acid, indole-3-butyric acid and zinc sulfate on the rooting and growth of mulberry cuttings. Int J Plant Biol 13:245-256. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijpb13030021

10.3390/ijpb13030021
79

Spaepen S, Vanderleyden J (2011) Auxin and plant-microbe interactions. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3:a001438. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001438

10.1101/cshperspect.a00143821084388
80

Stirbet A, Govindjee G (2011) On the relation between the Kautsky effect (chlorophyll a fluorescence induction) and photosystem II: basics and applications of the OJIP fluorescence transient. J Photochem Photobiol B 104:236-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.12.010

10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2010.12.01021295993
81

Sung JW, Song YG, Koo H, Kim HH, Byun SM, Lee CR, Park SG, Lee KC (2023) Physiological and growth responses of M. thunbergii to different levels of fertilization. Korean J Plant Resour 36:172-180. https://doi.org/10.7732/kjpr.2023.36.2.172

10.7732/kjpr.2023.36.2.172
82

Tao J, Hassan A, Qibing C, Yinggao L, Li G, Jiang M, Li D, Nian L, Bing-Yang L, Ziqin Z (2020) Psychological and physiological relaxation induced by nature-working with ornamental plants. Discrete Dyn Nat Soc 2020:6784512. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6784512

10.1155/2020/6784512
83

Tchoundjeu Z, Mpeck MLN, Asaah E, Amougou A (2004) The role of vegetative propagation in the domestication of Pausinystalia johimbe (K. Schum), a highly threatened medicinal species of West and Central Africa. For Ecol Manage 188:175-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.010

10.1016/j.foreco.2003.07.010
84

Thakor R, Mistry H, Bariya H (2023) Efficacy of indole-3-acetic acid-producing PGPFs and their consortium on physiological and biochemical parameters of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 64:533-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-023-00512-3

10.1007/s13580-023-00512-3
85

Tivendale ND, Millar AH (2022) How is auxin linked with cellular energy pathways to promote growth?. New Phytol 233:2397-2404. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17946

10.1111/nph.1794634984715
86

Valcárcel V, Fiz O, Vargas P (2003) Chloroplast and nuclear evidence for multiple origins of polyploids and diploids of Hedera (Araliaceae) in the Mediterranean basin. Mol Phylogenet Evol 27:1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00364-0

10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00364-012679067
87

Valcárcel V, Vargas P (2010) Quantitative morphology and species delimitation under the general lineage concept: optimization for Hedera (Araliaceae). Am J Bot 97:1555-1573. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1000115

10.3732/ajb.100011521616907
88

Wang M, Hu J, Guo G, Park YG, Jeong BR (2021a) Effect of auxins and their concentrations, immersion time, and rooting substrate on rooting of cutting-propagated Pyracantha angustifolia C.K. Schneid. Propag Ornam Plants 21:3-10

89

Wang P, Wang Z, Pan Q, Sun X, Chen H, Chen F, Yuan L, Mi G (2019) Increased biomass accumulation in maize grown in mixed nitrogen supply is mediated by auxin synthesis. J Exp Bot 70:1859-1873. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erz047

10.1093/jxb/erz04730759246
90

Wang R, ZongGuo X, Hu R, Wu J, Xu Y, Yu Z, Yang L, Yan G, Liu J, Zhang Y (2024) Biomass ash as soil fertilizers: supercharging biomass accumulation by shifting auxin distribution. Chemosphere 357:141910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.141910

10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.14191038582170
91

Wang Z, Su G, He S, Shi L, He D, Shang W, Yang D (2021b) Effects of root pruning on adventitious root formation, enzyme activities, and hormone levels in Paeonia suffruticosa 'Fengdanbai' seedlings. Hortic Sci Technol 39:10-22. https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20210002

10.7235/HORT.20210002
92

Yoo SY, Eom KC, Park SH, Kim TW (2012) Possibility of drought stress indexing by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging technique in red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Korean J Soil Sci Fert 45:676-682. https://doi.org/10.7745/KJSSF.2012.45.5.676

10.7745/KJSSF.2012.45.5.676
93

Zhang J, Chen S, Liu R, Jiang J, Chen F, Fang W (2013) Chrysanthemum cutting productivity and rooting ability are improved by grafting. Sci World J 2013:286328. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/286328

10.1155/2013/28632823878523
94

Zheng W, Tian Y, Shi H, Chen M, Hong S, Xu K, Cheng J, Zang Y (2023) Exogenous 5-aminolevulinic acid promotes plant growth and salinity tolerance of grape rootstocks in coastal areas. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 64:179-191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-022-00474-y

10.1007/s13580-022-00474-y
페이지 상단으로 이동하기