Research Article

Horticultural Science and Technology. 31 December 2024. 678-688
https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20240056

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  • Plant materials and germination of yuzu seeds

  • DNA extraction and HRM marker analyses

  • Constructing a linkage map of HRM markers and identifying sweet orange orthologs

  • Results

  • Identification of yuzu seedlings originating from zygotic embryos using molecular markers

  • Genotyping of the CitRWP gene controlling nucellar embryony and determination of the optimal set of HRM markers based on linkage relationships

  • Discussion

  • Identification of yuzu seedlings originating from zygotic embryos using molecular markers, as well as the morphological and genetic features of zygotic seedlings

  • Development of an optimal set of HRM markers for selecting zygotic seedlings and their application in yuzu breeding

Introduction

Yuzu (Citrus junos Sieb. Ex Tanaka), originating from China, was introduced to Japan and Korea over 1,000 years ago (Taninaka et al., 1981). It has since become one of the most important Citrus crops in Korea. The most conspicuous feature of yuzu is its delightful fruit fragrance. However, due to its intensely tart flavor, yuzu is generally consumed in processed forms, such as in beverages, perfumes, and oils (Matsumoto et al., 2016; González-Mas et al., 2019; Choi et al., 2022). Yuzu is also a key ingredient in many food products. In addition, research has shown that yuzu offers several health benefits, including antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects (Hirota et al., 2010; Yu et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2020).

Although extensive therapeutic and nutritional studies have concentrated on yuzu, the availability of its genetic and genomic information is relatively limited compared to other major Citrus crops such as sweet orange (Kim et al., 2010; Ghorabaie et al., 2010). Since the initial draft of the whole-genome sequence (367 Mb) of sweet orange was published (Xu et al., 2013), extensive genome sequence analyses of primitive, wild, and cultivated Citrus species have shed light on the origins and domestication history of these species (Wu et al., 2014, 2018, 2021; Wang et al., 2017, 2018; Rao et al., 2021).

The origin of yuzu has been a topic of controversy. Tanaka (1954, 1969) initially claimed that yuzu was not a hybrid and assigned it a scientific name. Several studies (Hirai et al., 1986; Uzun et al., 2009; Shimizu et al., 2016) supported Tanaka’s hypothesis through analyses of molecular markers. However, Swingle and Reece (1967) proposed that yuzu could be a natural hybrid between Ichang papeda (C. cavaleriei) and mandarin (C. reticulata). Recently, more extensive genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analyses of yuzu and related Citrus species have suggested that yuzu is most likely a natural hybrid between wild mandarin and Ichang papeda (Demarcq et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021; Jeong et al., 2022).

During the domestication of Citrus species, apomictic reproduction has played a crucial role in the development of modern Citrus varieties (Wang et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2021). Among the various types of apomixis, nucellar embryony, by which embryos develop from the somatic nucellar tissue surrounding the embryo sac, is widespread in many Citrus crops, including yuzu, sweet orange, mandarin, and lemon (Xu et al., 2021). Due to the development of multiple embryos from nucellar tissues, nucellar embryony is also known as polyembryony (Koltunow et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2021). The CitRWP gene, which regulates egg-cell-related genes, has been identified as the causal gene for nucellar embryony in Citrus (Wang et al., 2017; Shimada et al., 2018). The insertion of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITE) into the promoter region resulted in the overexpression of CitRWP,leading to nucellar embryony. Four mutant alleles containing two inverted or three tandem MITE insertions have been observed in various Citrus species (Jeong et al., 2023).

Given that the genetic compositions of mother plants and nucellar progenies are identical, nucellar embryony has been advantageous in maintaining desirable traits of rootstock or scion. However, it has posed a challenge with regard to generating genetic diversity in Citrus breeding programs. Some Citrus species, including yuzu, are known to produce seeds containing both nucellar and zygotic embryos (Zhang et al., 2018). However, it is almost impossible to distinguish zygotic seedlings from nucellar offspring by means of a visual examination. To introduce genetic diversity through self-fertilization or inter-specific hybridization, zygotic offspring should be identified within the progeny populations, which typically consist of a small number of zygotic seedlings and a larger number of nucellar seedlings.

A variety of molecular markers, such as isozyme (Soost and Williams, 1980), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD; Yun et al., 2007; Mondal and Saha, 2014; Jin et al., 2015), simple sequence repeat (SSR; Ruiz et al., 2000; Woo et al., 2019; Singh et al., 2020), and inter-simple sequence repeat markers (ISSR; Krueger and Roose, 2003; Golein et al., 2011; Kashyap et al., 2018) have been used to identify zygotic offspring from progenies derived from self-fertilization or inter-specific hybridization in Citrus species. However, no such attempt to identify zygotic seedlings has been performed in yuzu. In this study, high-resolution melting (HRM) markers were used to identify zygotic yuzu seedlings, and an optimal set of HRM markers was determined based on the linkage relationships and segregation distortions of these HRM markers.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and germination of yuzu seeds

Yuzu fruits harvested from three plants of the ‘Namhae 1-ho’ variety were used in this study. These yuzu plants were cultivated at the Jeollanam-do Agricultural Research and Extension Service, Wando-gun, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea. In earlier work (Yun et al., 2024), it was found that the genotypes of 34 HRM markers were identical in all three yuzu plants. For germination, seeds extracted from the fruits were immediately soaked in water, and the fruit flesh was completely removed by hand. The clean seeds were immersed in water for three days, and floating seeds were discarded. After a small portion of the hilum was cut with fingernail clippers, the seed coats were removed by hand. The seeds were then planted in 50-hole seed germination trays (54 × 28 cm) filled with commercial nursery bed soil. As yuzu seeds are classified as recalcitrant seeds, they were kept moist throughout all stages, i.e., from extraction to germination.

DNA extraction and HRM marker analyses

Total genomic DNA was extracted from the leaf tissues of four- to six-leaf stage seedlings using the CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle, 1987). In total, 21 HRM markers developed in previous studies (Jeong et al., 2022, 2023) were used in this study. For genotyping of the HRM markers, HRM analyses were conducted in 20 µL reaction mixtures containing 0.05 µg of a template along with 2.0 µL 10x PCR buffer, 1.0 µL forward primer (10 µM), 1.0 µL reverse primer (10 µM), 1.0 µL dNTPs (10 mM each), 0.25 U Taq polymerase (Prime Tag DNA polymerase; GeNet Bio, Nonsan, Republic of Korea), and 1.0 µL 100-fold diluted SYTO®9 green fluorescent nucleic acid stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The primer sequences of the HRM markers are shown in Suppl. Table S1.

The PCR amplification protocol consisted of an initial denaturation step of incubation at 95°C for 10 min, followed by 45 cycles of incubation at 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 5 s, and 72°C for 5 s. The PCR products were then heated to 95°C at a rate of 4.4°C/s, cooled to 40°C at a rate of 2.2°C/s, and heated again to 65°C at a rate of 2.2°C/s. HRM peaks were obtained using a LightCycler® 96 system (Roche Molecular Systems, Pleasanton, CA, USA) by melting the samples from 65°C to 97°C at a rate of 0.07°C/s. For genotyping of the CitRWP-MK2H marker, an HRM assay with an unlabeled probe as developed by Montgomery et al. (2007) was used. The unlabeled probe (5’-TTG-GAT-TAA-TGA-TCA-ATT-TTC-TGC-3’) with 3’ phosphorylation was utilized. A more detailed protocol is described in the literature (Jeong et al., 2023).

Constructing a linkage map of HRM markers and identifying sweet orange orthologs

Genotyping data from 21 HRM markers of 197 zygotic seedlings were used to construct a linkage map using JoinMap 4.1 (Van Ooijen and Voorrips, 2001). The linkage groups were visualized using MapChart 2.3 (Voorrips, 2002). To identify sweet orange genes showing homology with the yuzu cDNAs, which were used to develop the HRM markers, a BLAST search provided by the Citrus Genome Database (www.citrusgenomedb.org) was conducted. The target databases in the search were the sweet orange transcriptome (Citrus sinensis DHSO v3.0 genome transcripts) and the whole genome of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis DHSO v3.0 genome scaffolds).

Results

Identification of yuzu seedlings originating from zygotic embryos using molecular markers

To assess this frequency and select desirable seedlings from the zygotic embryos, a total of 837 yuzu seeds were germinated. Out of these, seedlings emerged from 707 seeds, resulting in a seed germination rate of 84.5%. Multiple seedlings were observed from 244 germinated seeds (Suppl. Fig. S1). Because seedlings from zygotic embryos were visually indistinguishable from those derived from nucellar embryos, molecular markers were used to identify the zygotic seedlings resulting from self-fertilization.

In our previous study (Jeong et al., 2022), 44 HRM markers were developed in yuzu based on SNPs in the cDNA sequences that were de novo assembled using RNA-Seq reads. Among them, ten HRM markers showing clear HRM peak patterns and heterozygous genotypes in the three mother plants of all seedlings were subjected to an analysis (Suppl. Table S1 and Fig. 1). A total of 973 seedlings were analyzed using these ten HRM markers. The results showed that at least one HRM marker exhibited homozygous genotypes in 197 seedlings, while the rest showed all heterozygous genotypes for the ten HRM markers, like the mother plants. This indicates that at least 20.2% of the seedlings originated from zygotic embryos (Suppl. Table S2). Among the 197 zygotic seedlings, 34 individuals were identified from multiple seedlings germinated from single seeds.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2024-042-06/N0130420604/images/HST_42_06_04_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

HRM peak patterns of 10 HRM markers initially used to identify zygotic seedlings. Genotypes: a and b, homozygous genotypes of control samples; h, heterozygous genotypes of three mother plants. Homozygous genotypes (a and b) are arbitrarily assigned to the HRM peaks containing lower and higher melting temperatures, respectively.

While a maximum of eight homozygous genotypes were observed in four seedlings, only one homozygous genotype was detected in seven seedlings (Suppl. Table S2). To confirm the zygotic origins further and to select the optimal set of HRM markers, all 197 zygotic seedlings were analyzed using eleven additional HRM markers. Genotypes of these eleven markers were also heterozygous in the mother plants. The results showed that at least three homozygous genotypes were identified in all 197 seedlings (Suppl. Table S3), indicating that these seedlings had derived from zygotic embryos. On average, 9.72 homozygous genotypes were observed in zygotic seedlings analyzed using 21 HRM markers here (Fig. 2A), slightly lower than the expected number of 10.5 in normal self-fertilized populations.

Regarding the segregation ratios of the 21 HRM markers, genotype ratios of nine markers were consistent with the expected 1:2:1 ratio. However, twelve other markers showed significant amounts of segregation distortion (Table 1). Among them, eight markers exhibited severe segregation distortion (p < 0.01). Interestingly, extreme levels of segregation distortion were observed in two markers (YH12239 and YH471). For YH12239, only three ‘b’ genotypes were observed, and the proportion of homozygous genotypes was slightly lower compared to most other markers (Suppl. Table S3 and Fig. 2B). With regard to the YH471 marker, the ‘b’ genotype was completely absent. In addition, the proportion of homozygous genotypes was halved in the YH471 marker (Suppl. Table S3 and Fig. 2B), indicating that seedlings containing the ‘b’ genotype of the YH471 marker did not survive.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2024-042-06/N0130420604/images/HST_42_06_04_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.

Frequencies of homozygous genotypes of 21 HRM markers in 197 zygotic seedlings. A. Histogram showing the distribution of the number of HRM markers exhibiting homozygous genotypes in individual zygotic seedlings. B. Proportion of homozygous genotypes among the 197 zygotic seedlings for each of the 21 HRM markers. M1–21, serial numbers of the 21 HRM markers. Detailed information on the HRM markers is provided in Supplementary Table 1. The YH471 and YH12239 markers showing severe segregation distortions are marked with red asterisks.

Genotyping of the CitRWP gene controlling nucellar embryony and determination of the optimal set of HRM markers based on linkage relationships

Using molecular markers developed in our previous study, yuzu was found to have a heterozygous genotype for the CitRWP gene (Jeong et al., 2023). The CitRWP genotypes of 197 zygotic seedlings were analyzed using the previously developed CitRWP-MK2H marker (Suppl. Fig. S2). This HRM marker was designed based on the mutant allele-specific SNP (Jeong et al., 2023). The segregation ratio of CitRWP genotypes did not fit the expected 1:2:1 ratio (Table 1), showing moderate segregation distortion. Significantly fewer (33) homozygous dominant genotypes conferring nucellar embryony were detected compared to the homozygous recessive wild-type genotypes (61) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Segregation ratios of genotypes for 21 HRM markers in 197 zygotic seedlings. P values lower than 0.05 are highlighted in bold. Genotypes: a, homozygous genotypes showing HRM peaks with lower melting temperatures; h, heterozygous genotypes; b, homozygous genotypes showing HRM peaks with higher melting temperatures

Marker Observed ratio (a : h : b) Expected ratio (a : h : b) χ2 P
CitRWP-MK2H 33:103:61 1:2:1 8.37 0.015
YH275 22:114:61 1:2:1 20.32 0.00
YH379 59:90:48 1:2:1 2.70 0.26
YH471 39:158:0 1:2:1 87.32 0.00
YH479 28:105:64 1:2:1 14.02 0.0009
YH515 66:113:18 1:2:1 27.66 0.00
YH605 51:105:41 1:2:1 1.87 0.39
YH784 59:91:47 1:2:1 2.60 0.27
YH821 36:90:71 1:2:1 13.90 0.0009
YH1017 31:104:62 1:2:1 10.37 0.0055
YH2302 33:106:58 1:2:1 7.49 0.024
YH2592 59:106:32 1:2:1 8.54 0.014
YH2681 65:91:41 1:2:1 6.99 0.03
YH3132 51:103:43 1:2:1 1.06 0.59
YH3368 53:99:45 1:2:1 0.65 0.72
YH3728 66:100:31 1:2:1 12.48 0.0019
YH4894 41:111:45 1:2:1 3.34 0.19
YH5040 42:101:54 1:2:1 1.59 0.45
YH8088 36:106:55 1:2:1 4.81 0.09
YH12239 62:132:3 1:2:1 58.13 0.00
YH18571 46:94:57 1:2:1 1.64 0.44

In total, 21 HRM markers including CitRWP-MK2H were analyzed in this study to identify the zygotic seedlings. However, the chromosomal positions of these markers were not resolved in yuzu. If any of these markers were closely linked to each other, the efficiency of identifying zygotic seedlings would be significantly reduced. To identify any close linkages of markers, the linkage relationships of all 21 markers were analyzed. Mapping all 21 markers using 197 zygotic seedlings resulted in nine independent groups at the threshold level of LOD 2.0. Five linkage groups containing at least two linked markers were produced. For example, YH784 and YH379 showed the tightest linkage with a distance of 0.8 cM (Fig. 3).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2024-042-06/N0130420604/images/HST_42_06_04_F3.jpg
Fig. 3.

Linkage relationships of 21 HRM markers and identification of sweet orange orthologs. Left side of each panel: sweet orange physical maps. Right side of each panel: yuzu linkage maps. Homologous genes are connected with horizontal lines. Detailed information is provided in Supplementary Table 4.

Furthermore, the putative chromosomal positions of the 21 HRM markers were assessed by identifying the chromosomal positions of sweet orange orthologs showing homology with yuzu cDNAs (Suppl. Table S4). Collinearity between the yuzu and sweet orange genes was well conserved (Fig. 3). The positions of 17 linked HRM markers were perfectly collinear with those of the sweet orange homologs, except for YH471; YH471 was linked to YH3368 and YH18571 in the yuzu linkage map, but no sweet orange homolog was identified in the corresponding region of the sweet orange genome. Rather, the chromosomal region with the highest degree of homology was identified on a different chromosome, although the homology level (94.5%) was relatively low compared to other markers (Suppl. Table S4).

Considering the linkage relationships among the 21 HRM markers, the optimal set of HRM markers was determined for the efficient selection of yuzu zygotic seedlings. First, one marker with no segregation distortion was chosen from each of the five linkage groups. The CitRWP-MK2H marker was included for genotyping the CitRWP gene, despite showing moderate segregation distortion. Second, YH3132, which was not part of any linkage groups and showed no segregation distortion, was included. An analysis of 197 zygotic seedlings in this study revealed that all could be identified using the combination of these six HRM markers (CitRWP-MK2H, YH605, YH784, YH3132, YH5040, and YH18571).

Discussion

Identification of yuzu seedlings originating from zygotic embryos using molecular markers, as well as the morphological and genetic features of zygotic seedlings

Yuzu is primarily reproduced through nucellar embryony, but zygotic embryos are also produced in yuzu (Zhang et al., 2018). However, the frequency of zygotic embryo production in yuzu is still unknown. In this study, yuzu seedlings derived from zygotic embryos were successfully identified using HRM markers and the frequency of yuzu zygotic embryogenesis was assessed for the first time. Various genetic markers, including morphological, isozyme, RAPD, and SSR markers, have been used to detect zygotic seedlings in Citrus species (Kishore and Rani, 2013). We used higher-throughput SNP-based HRM markers to analyze a large number of samples in this study. SNP markers have emerged as the primary genotyping tools in plant breeding due to their suitability for automation and high-throughput analysis (Thomson, 2014). Nevertheless, only a few studies have utilized SNP-based markers for this purpose.

In this study, the proportion of yuzu seedlings with zygotic origins was estimated to be 20.2%. The frequencies of zygotic seedlings analyzed in other Citrus species vary significantly depending on the species and variety, ranging from 0.8% to more than 50% (Ashari et al., 1988; Andrade-Rodríguez et al., 2004; Golein et al., 2011; Kashyap et al., 2018). However, the numbers of samples analyzed in other studies typically amount to less than 250. In contrast, 973 yuzu seedlings were analyzed in this study. Therefore, the reliability of the frequency of zygotic seedlings obtained in this study may be relatively high relative to that of other studies. However, it is assumed that the frequency of zygotic embryogenesis in yuzu is underestimated, as a substantial number of zygotic embryos may not grow into seedlings. Generally, the growth of zygotic seedlings identified in this study was inferior to that of nucellar seedlings (Suppl. Fig. S3).

Poor growth of zygotic yuzu seedlings is attributable to inbreeding depression, which is caused by either increased homozygosity of loci with deleterious alleles or decreased heterozygosity of loci involved in hybrid vigor (Charlesworth and Charlesworth, 1999; Charlesworth and Willis, 2009; Hedrick and Garcia-Dorado, 2016). Previous studies (Swingle and Reece, 1967; Handa et al., 1986; Demarcq et al., 2021; Wu et al., 2021; Jeong et al., 2022) have suggested that yuzu is a natural hybrid between wild mandarin and Ichang papeda, although the timing of this hybridization remains unknown. Based on the observation of inferior growth in most zygotic seedlings in this study, it is assumed that natural hybridization likely occurred in ancient times, resulting in the accumulation of many deleterious mutations. Notably, twelve out of 21 HRM markers analyzed in this study showed segregation distortion in the zygotic seedling population (Table 1), possibly due to the presence of deleterious alleles. In the case of YH471, one of the two alternate homozygous genotypes was completely absent, indicating the presence of lethal alleles in the yuzu chromosomal region associated with YH471.

Despite the presence of many deleterious alleles, nucellar seedlings that maintained hybridity could have survived, as the majority of loss-of-function mutations are inherited as recessive mutations. On the other hand, zygotic seedlings that may contain homozygous genotypes of deleterious alleles may be less apt to prevail. Consequently, the genetic diversity of yuzu has become very limited. In fact, we previously analyzed the genetic diversity of 265 yuzu plants grown in Korea using SNPs identified through RNA-Seq and whole-genome resequencing (Yun et al., 2024). However, we could not find any yuzu plants derived from zygotic embryos. Therefore, marker-assisted selection of zygotic seedlings produced through self-fertilization or inter-specific hybridization is necessary to create more genetic diversity and develop new varieties of yuzu.

Development of an optimal set of HRM markers for selecting zygotic seedlings and their application in yuzu breeding

The linkage relationships of 21 HRM markers were examined in this study to identify closely linked markers. Despite using only 21 markers to construct a linkage map, this map represents the first linkage map of yuzu to the best of our knowledge. With a total of 197 zygotic seedlings used for map construction, the calculated genetic distances are likely reliable. Furthermore, the collinearity between yuzu markers and sweet orange orthologs was well conserved, except for YH471 (Fig. 3). The lack of an orthologous gene in the sweet orange genome for the YH471 marker suggests that the gene tagged by YH471 may be specific to yuzu. The observed collinearity between the two species further supports the reliability of the linkage relationships of yuzu markers. Although the whole-genome sequence of yuzu is currently unavailable, it is assumed that the synteny between yuzu and sweet orange genomes is well conserved. In earlier work (Yun et al., 2024), over 80% and 72% of RNA-Seq and whole-genome resequencing reads of yuzu, respectively, were accurately mapped to the sweet orange reference transcriptome and whole-genome sequence.

Five linkage groups, each consisting of more than two linked markers, were identified (Fig. 3). The YH784 and YH379 markers were found to be linked to each other with a distance of 0.8 cM. Only three zygotic seedlings were identified as recombinants between these two markers showing different genotypes (Suppl. Table S3). Therefore, analyzing these two markers for the identification of zygotic seedlings may be redundant. Likewise, when other markers within the same linkage groups are used together, the efficiency of zygotic seedling selection may be diminished. However, most studies focusing on the marker-assisted selection of zygotic seedlings have not revealed any linkage relationships among markers. Considering the positions of HRM markers within the linkage groups, an optimal set of six HRM markers was selected in this study. This set of markers will be efficiently used to identify zygotic seedlings in yuzu breeding programs in the future.

The CitRWP-MK2H marker used to genotype the CitRWP gene controlling nucellar embryony was included in the optimal set of markers. This marker, developed based on the mutant-specific SNP (Jeong et al., 2023), allowed for an accurate prediction of CitRWP gene genotypes. Zygotic seedlings containing the homozygous genotype of the wild-type CitRWP allele may not exhibit the trait of nucellar embryony, resulting in offspring derived from zygotic embryos. These yuzu offspring can contribute to increased genetic diversity in yuzu breeding programs. While zygotic seedlings typically show poor growth, some have exhibited vigor comparable to nucellar seedlings (Suppl. Fig. S3). Therefore, the optimal set of HRM markers developed in this study will be valuable as they can ensure the effective selection of a limited number of desirable and promising zygotic seedlings.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary materials are available at Horticultural Science and Technology website (https://www.hst-j.org).

  • Supplementary Table S2. Genotypes of 973 yuzu seedlings for the 10 HRM markers. The homozgyous genotypes (a and b) are arbitarily assinged for low and high melting peaks, respectively

    HORT_20240056_Table_S2.xlsx
  • Supplementary Table S3. Genotypes of 21 HRM markers of the 197 seedlings originating from zygotic embryogenesis

    HORT_20240056_Table_S3.xlsx
  • Supplementary Table S4. List of sweet orange genes showing the highest homology with the yuzu cDNA containing the SNPs used to design 21 HRM markers

    HORT_20240056_Table_S4.xlsx

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture and Forestry (No. 322067-03-3-HD020), the “Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ016161)” funded by the Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea, and by BK21 FOUR funded by the Ministry of Education of Korea and National Research Foundation of Korea. The authors thank Ji-Wha Hur, Jeong-Ahn Yoo, and Su-Jung Kim for their dedicated technical assistance.

References

1

Andrade-Rodríguez M, Villegas-Monter A, Carrillo-Castañeda G, García-Velázquez A (2004) Polyembryony and identification of Volkamerian lemon zygotic and nucellar seedlings using RAPD. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 39:551-559. doi:10.1590/S0100-204X2004000600006

10.1590/S0100-204X2004000600006
2

Ashari S, Aspinall D, Sedgley M (1988) Discrimination of zygotic and nucellar seedlings of five polyembryonic citrus rootstocks by isozyme analysis and seedling morphology. J Hortic Sci 63:695-703. doi:10.1080/14620316.1988.11515912

10.1080/14620316.1988.11515912
3

Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D (1999) The genetic basis of inbreeding depression. Genet Res Camb 74:329-340. doi:10.1017/S0016672399004152

10.1017/S001667239900415210689809
4

Charlesworth D, Willis JH (2009) The genetics of inbreeding depression. Nat Rev Genet 10:783-796. doi:10.1038/nrg2664

10.1038/nrg266419834483
5

Choi M, Yang S, Kim N, Shin H (2022) Nomilin from yuzu seed has in vitro antioxidant activity and downregulates melanogenesis in B16F10 melanoma cells through the PKA/CREB signaling pathway. Antioxidants 11:1636. doi:10.3390/antiox11091636

10.3390/antiox1109163636139710PMC9495840
6

Demarcq B, Cavailles M, Lambert L, Schippa C, Ollitrault P, Luro F (2021) Characterization of odor-active compounds of Ichang lemon (Citrus wilsonii Tan.) and identification of its genetic interspecific origin by DNA genotyping. J Agric Food Chem 69:3175-3188. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.0c07894

10.1021/acs.jafc.0c0789433667086
7

Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11-15

8

Ghorabaie HRR, Ghazvini RF, Golein B, Nabipour AR (2010) Identificatin of some Citrus accessions in a citrus germplasm utilizing simple sequence repeat markers (SSRs). Hort Environ Biotechnol 51:343-347

9

Golein B, Fifaei R, Ghasemi M (2011) Identification of zygotic and nucellar seedlings in citrus interspecific crosses by inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR) markers. Afr J Biotechnol 10:18965-18970

10

González-Mas MC, Rambla JL, López-Gresa MP, Blázquez MA, Granell A (2019) Volatile compounds in Citrus essential oils: A Comprehensive Review. Front Plant Sci 10:12. doi:10.3389/fpls.2019.00012

10.3389/fpls.2019.0001230804951PMC6370709
11

Handa T, Ishizawa Y, Oogaki C (1986) Phylogenetic study of fraction I protein in the genus Citrus and its close related genera. Jpn J Genet 61:15-24. doi:10.1266/jjg.61.15

10.1266/jjg.61.15
12

Hedrick PW, Garcia-Dorado A (2016) Understanding inbreeding depression, purging, and genetic rescue. Trends Ecol Evol 31:940-952. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.005

10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.00527743611
13

Hirai M, Kozaki I, Kajiura I (1986) Isozyme analysis and phylogenic relationship of citrus. Jpn J Breed 36:377-389. doi:10.1270/jsbbs1951.36.377

10.1270/jsbbs1951.36.377
14

Hirota R, Roger NN, Nakamura H, Song H, Sawamura M, Suganuma N (2010) Anti-inflammatory effects of limonene from yuzu (Citrus junos Tanaka) essential oil on eosinophils. J Food Sci 75:H87-H92. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01541.x

10.1111/j.1750-3841.2010.01541.x20492298
15

Jeong H, Yun Y, Jeong S, Cho Y, Kim S (2022) Identification of putative parental species of yuzu (Citrus junos Sieb. Ex Tanaka) by comparative analyses of variations in chloroplast genomes and nuclear single-copy genes of citrus. Hortic Sci Technol 40:420-431. doi:10.7235/HORT.20220038

10.7235/HORT.20220038
16

Jeong H, Yun Y, Jeong S, Cho Y, Kim S (2023) Characterization of miniature inverted repeat transposable elements inserted in the CitRWP gene controlling nucellar embryony and development of molecular markers for reliable genotyping of CitRWP in Citrus species. Sci Hortic 315:112003. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112003

10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112003
17

Jin S, Yun S, Park J, Park S, Koh S, Lee D (2015) Early identification of Citrus zygotic seedlings using pollen-specific molecular markers. Kor J Hortic Sci Technol 33:598-604. doi:10.7235/hort.2015.14200

10.7235/hort.2015.14200
18

Kashyap K, Banu S, Shrivastava MN, Ramchiary N (2018) Study of polyembryony and development of molecular markers for identification of zygotic and nucellar seedlings in Khasi mandarin (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol 3:363-372. doi:10.22161/ijeab/3.2.8

10.22161/ijeab/3.2.8
19

Kim I, Nam T, Kim C, Song K, Lee D (2010) Isolation and expression patterns of a zeta-carotene desaturase gene from Citrus. Hort Environ Biotechnol 51:551-555

20

Kim SH, Hur HJ, Yang HJ, Kim HJ, Kim MJ, Park JH, Sung MJ, Kim MS, Kwon DY, et al. (2013) Citrus junos Tanaka peel extract exerts antidiabetic effects via AMPK and PPAR-γ both in vitro and in vivo in mice fed a high-fat diet. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2013:921012. doi:10.1155/2013/921012

10.1155/2013/92101223762167PMC3674686
21

Kishore M, Rani MU (2013) Techniques to differentiate zygotic and nucellar seedlings in polyembryonic fruit crops. Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol 6:344-350. doi:10.5958/j.2230-732X.6.3.006

10.5958/j.2230-732X.6.3.006
22

Koltunow AM, Hidaka T, Robinson SP (1996) Polyembryony in Citrus. Accumulation of seed storage proteins in seeds and in embryos cultured in vitro. Plant Physiol 110:599-609. doi:10.1104/pp.110.2.599

10.1104/pp.110.2.5998742336PMC157756
23

Krueger RR, Roose ML (2003) Use of molecular markers in the management of citrus germplasm resources. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:827-837. doi:10.21273/JASHS.128.6.0827

10.21273/JASHS.128.6.0827
24

Lee BK, Hyun S, Jung Y (2020) Yuzu and hesperidin ameliorate blood-brain barrier disruption during hypoxia via antioxidant activity. Antioxidants 9:843. doi:10.3390/antiox9090843

10.3390/antiox909084332916895PMC7555663
25

Matsumoto T, Kimura T, Hayashi T (2016) Aromatic effects of a Japanese citrus fruit-yuzu (Citrus junos Sieb. ex Tanaka)-on psychoemotional states and autonomic nervous system activity during the menstrual cycle: a single-blind randomized controlled crossover study. Biopsychosoc Med 10:11. doi:10.1186/s13030-016-0063-7

10.1186/s13030-016-0063-727103942PMC4839105
26

Mondal B, Saha R (2014) Identification of zygotic and nucellar seedlings of Citrus reticulata and Citrus aurantifolia using RAPD. Int J Adv Biotechnol Res 5:25-30

27

Montgomery J, Wittwer CT, Palais R, Zhou L (2007) Simultaneous mutation scanning and genotyping by high-resolution DNA melting analysis. Nat Protoc 2:59-66. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.10

10.1038/nprot.2007.1017401339
28

Rao MJ, Zuo H, Xu Q (2021) Genomic insights into citrus domestication and its important agronomic traits. Plant Commun 2:100138. doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100138

10.1016/j.xplc.2020.10013833511347PMC7816076
29

Ruiz C, Breto MP, Asins MJ (2000) A quick methodology to identify sexual seedlings in citrus breeding programs using SSR markers. Euphytica 112:89-94. doi:10.1023/A:1003992719598

10.1023/A:1003992719598
30

Shimada T, Endo T, Fujii H, Nakano M, Sugiyama A, Daido G, Ohta S, Yoshioka T, Omura M (2018) MITE insertion-dependent expression of CitRKD1 with a RWP-RK domain regulates somatic embryogenesis in citrus nucellar tissues. BMC Plant Biol 18:166. doi:10.1186/s12870-018-1369-3

10.1186/s12870-018-1369-330103701PMC6090715
31

Shimizu T, Kitajima A, Nonaka K, Yoshioka T, Ohta S, Goto S, Toyoda A, Fujiyama A, Mochizuki T, et al. (2016) Hybrid origins of citrus varieties inferred from DNA marker analysis of nuclear and organelle genomes. PLOS One 11:e0166969. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0166969

10.1371/journal.pone.016696927902727PMC5130255
32

Singh J, Dhaliwal HS, Thakur A, Sidhu GS, Chhuneja P, Gmitter Jr. FG (2020) Optimizing recovery of hybrid embryos from interspecific citrus crosses of polyembryonic rough lemon (Citrus jambhiri Lush.). Agronomy 10:1940. doi:10.3390/agronomy10121940

10.3390/agronomy10121940
33

Soost RK, Williams TE (1980) Identification of nucellar and zygotic seedlings of Citrus with leaf enzymes. HortScience 15:728-729. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.15.6.728

10.21273/HORTSCI.15.6.728
34

Swingle WT, Reece PC (1967) The botany of citrus and its wild relative. In: Reuther W, Webber HJ, Batchelor LD (eds). The Citrus industry, vol 1. Univ Calif Press, Berkeley Calif, USA, pp 389-390

35

Tanaka T (1954) Species problem in citrus; a critical study of wild and cultivated units of citrus, based upon field studies in their native homes. Tokyo, Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science

36

Tanaka T (1969) Misunderstanding with regards citrus classification and nomenclature. Bull Univ Osaka Pref Ser B 21:139-145

37

Taninaka T, Otoi N, Moromoto J (1981) Acid citrus cultivars related to the yuzu (Citrus junos Sieb. ex Tanaka) in Japan. In: Matsumoto K, Oogaki C, Kozaki I (Eds.) Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, Vol. 1. Aiko Printing Co., Tokyo, Japan, pp. 73-76

38

Thomson MJ (2014) High-throughput SNP genotyping to accelerate crop improvement. Plant Breed Biotechnol 2:195-212. doi:10.9787/PBB.2014.2.3.195

10.9787/PBB.2014.2.3.195
39

Uzun A, Yesiloglu T, Aka-Kacar Y, Tuzcu O, Gulsen O (2009) Genetic diversity and relationships within Citrus and related genera based on sequence related amplified polymorphism markers (SRAPs). Sci Hortic 121:306-312. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2009.02.018

10.1016/j.scienta.2009.02.018
40

Van Ooijen JW, Voorrips RE (2001) JoinMap® 3.0, Software for the calculation of genetic linkage maps. Plant Res Int, Wageningen, Netherlands.

41

Voorrips RE (2002) MapChart: Software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered 93:77-78. doi:10.1093/jhered/93.1.77

10.1093/jhered/93.1.7712011185
42

Wang L, He F, Huang Y, He J, Yang S, Zeng J, Deng C, Jiang X, Fang Y, et al. (2018) Genome of wild mandarin and domestication history of mandarin. Mol Plant 11:1024-1037. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2018.06.001

10.1016/j.molp.2018.06.00129885473
43

Wang X, Xu Y, Zhang S, Cao L, Huang Y, Cheng J, Wu G, Tian S, Chen C, et al. (2017) Genomic analyses of primitive, wild and cultivated citrus provide insights into asexual reproduction. Nat Genet 49:765-772. doi:10.1038/ng.3839

10.1038/ng.383928394353
44

Woo J, Park Y, Lee J, Yun S, Kim M, Park S, Lee Y, Song K, Kim H (2019) Evaluation of polyembryony for genetic resources and efficacy of simple sequence repeat markers for the identification of nucellar and zygotic embryo-derived individuals in citrus. Appl Biol Chem 62:30. doi:10.1186/s13765-019-0437-1

10.1186/s13765-019-0437-1
45

Wu GA, Prochnik S, Jenkins J, Salse J, Hellsten U, Murat F, Perrier X, Ruiz M, Scalabrin S, et al. (2014) Sequencing of diverse mandarin, pummelo and orange genomes reveals complex history of admixture during citrus domestication. Nat Biotechnol 32:656-662. doi:10.1038/nbt.2906

10.1038/nbt.290624908277PMC4113729
46

Wu GA, Sugimoto C, Kinjo H, Azama C, Mitsube F, Talon M, Gmitter Jr. FG, Rokhsar DS (2021) Diversification of mandarin citrus by hybrid speciation and apomixis. Nat Commun 12:4377. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24653-0

10.1038/s41467-021-24653-034312382PMC8313541
47

Wu GA, Terol J, Ibanez V, López-García A, Pérez-Román E, Borredá C, Domingo C, Tadeo FR, Carbonell-Caballero J, et al. (2018) Genomics of the origin and evolution of Citrus. Nature 554:311-316. doi:10.1038/nature25447

10.1038/nature2544729414943
48

Xu Q, Chen LL, Ruan X, Chen D, Zhu A, Chen C, Bertrand D, Jiao WB, Hao BH, et al. (2013) The draft genome of sweet orange (Citrus sinensis). Nat Genet 45:59-66. doi:10.1038/ng.2472

10.1038/ng.247223179022
49

Xu Y, Jia H, Wu X, Koltunow AMG, Deng X, Xu Q (2021) Regulation of nucellar embryony, a mode of sporophytic apomixis in Citrus resembling somatic embryogenesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol 59:101984. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2020.101984

10.1016/j.pbi.2020.10198433418404
50

Yu HY, Park SW, Chung IM, Jung Y (2011) Anti-platelet effects of yuzu extract and its component. Food Chem Toxicol 49:3018-3024. doi:10.1016/j.fct.2011.09.038

10.1016/j.fct.2011.09.03822005257
51

Yun J, Yang H, Jung Y, Yun S, Kim K, Kim C, Song K (2007) Identification of zygotic and nucellar mandarin seedlings using randomly amplified polymorphic DNA. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 48:171-175

52

Yun YB, Jeong H, Cho Y, Kim S (2024) Analysis of genetic diversity of yuzu (Citrus junos Sieb. Ex Tanaka) using single nucleotide polymorphisms identified through RNA-seq and whole-genome resequencing analyses. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol, Published Online. doi:10.1080/14620316.2023.2265360

10.1080/14620316.2023.2265360
53

Zhang S, Liang M, Wang N, Xu Q, Deng X, Chai L (2018) Reproduction in woody perennial Citrus: an update on nucellar embryony and self-incompatibility. Plant Reprod 31:43-57. doi:10.1007/s00497-018-0327-4

10.1007/s00497-018-0327-429457194
페이지 상단으로 이동하기