Research Article

Horticultural Science and Technology. June 2018. 417-425
https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20180041

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   Plant Samples

  •   Chromosome Spread Preparation

  •   Probe Preparation

  •   Fluorescence in situ hybridization

  • Results

  • Discussion

Introduction

Several species of the Cucurbitaceae family such as Cucumis sativus (cucumber), Cucumis melo (melon), Citrullus lanatus (watermelon) and Cucurbita spp. (pumpkins) are economically important, generating multi-billion dollars for food, cosmetic and pharmaceutical industry (Jeffrey, 2005; Weng and Sun, 2012). Additionally, other wild cucurbits possess economically and medicinally important traits that can be exploited for crop improvement of related species. For example, some Melothria and Trichosanthes species are good source of proteolytic enzymes and trichosanthin used as anti-HIV drug (McGrath et al., 1989; Lee-Huang et al., 1991; Mayer et al., 1992; Uchikoba et al., 2001; Antão and Malcata, 2005; Qian et al., 2012). Sicyos angulatus, a wild invasive species introduced to Korea in the mid-20th century (Tzonev, 2005), is used as a rootstock for grafting cucumbers and watermelons to

enhance resistance to nematodes and improve yield (Lee, 1994; Shengping et al., 2006).

Cytogenetic studies offer complementary and novel information on genome organization, gene activity and meiotic recombination (Heslop-Harrison, 1991). The development of cytogenetic tools has been highly utilized in breeding programs to manipulate both the genetic make-up and the crop-to-wild gene transmission system (Sain et al., 2002; Sybenga, 2012); including those of wheat, maize (Benavente et al., 2008; Albert et al., 2010; Icso et al., 2014) and watermelon (Sain et al., 2002). Tropical and subtropical cucurbits, like C. melo var flexuosus, M. pendula and T. anguina, are good genetic resources for the breeding of Korean cucurbits considering that the climate of Korean peninsula is gradually changing from temperate to subtropical (Bohnert et al., 1995). Hence, several cucurbits have been improved using cytogenetic-based breeding approach. For example, recent introgression breeding from a wild relative of cucumber, Cucumis hystrix, has increased the genetic diversity of cucumber (Zhuang et al., 2006; Delannay et al., 2010). Additionally, introgression between cultivars and wild relatives of bitter gourds (Momordica charantia) (Liao et al., 2012) and Citrullus (Sain et al., 2002) have also been reported.

In spite of the potential of the exotic cucurbit species of C. melo var. flexuosus (L.) Naudin, M. pendula L., and T. anguina L. as genetic resources for medicinal use and crop production (Lira and Caballero, 2002; Ojiako and Igwe, 2008), cytogenetic-based research investigating chromosome characteristics and genome composition is very limited. Most cucurbit species have small chromosomes that are difficult to distinguish (Waminal and Kim, 2012), however, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) has revealed the identity of chromosome pairs and provided information that can be used in breeding programs (Huang et al., 2009; Waminal et al., 2011; Waminal and Kim, 2012). We have carried out triple-color FISH karyotype analysis with Korean wild or crop cucurbit species that will be useful for phylogenetic comparative studies and breeding programs focusing on Korean Cucurbitaceae family (Waminal et al., 2011; Waminal and Kim, 2012; Waminal and Kim, 2015). Here, we determined chromosome composition and distribution patterns of rDNA and telomeric DNA, employing triple-color FISH analysis, in three exotic cucurbit species of C. melo var. flexuosus (L.) Naudin, M. pendula L., T. anguina L. found in tropical and subtropical habitats providing major repeat-based karyotypes of these species and potentially improve their medicinal and vegetably use.

Materials and Methods

Plant Samples

Three tropical or subtropical exotic cucurbit species were used. The seeds of Armenian cucumber Cucumis melo var. flexuosus (L.) Naudin was purchased from Botanical Interest, Inc. Broomfield; the creeping cucumber or the Guadeloupe cucumber Melothria pendula L. and Trichosanthes anguina L. were collected from Opol, Misamis Oriental Province, Philippines and cultivated field in South Chungcheong Province, Korea, respectively. Each species was identified based on distinct morphological characteristics (Lee, 2003) and confirmed by wild plant taxonomist. Seeds were germinated on moist petri dish at 25°C. Harvested roots (~2 cm in length) were pretreated with 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline at 18°C temperature for five hours, fixed in Carnoy’s fixative and stored in 70% ethanol at 4°C until further use.

Chromosome Spread Preparation

Somatic chromosome spreads were prepared according to the procedure of Waminal and Kim (2012). In brief, root tips (-2 mm) were digested in pectolytic enzyme solution [2% Cellulase R-10 (C224, Phytotechnology Laboratories) and 1% Pectolyase Y-23 (P8004.0001, Duchefa) in 100 mM citrate buffer] at 37°C for 75 minutes. The root tips were washed in distilled water and transferred into Carnoy’s solution and vortexed for 30 s. Pellets were resuspended in 9:1 (v/v) aceto-ethanol and subsequently spread on pre-cleaned slides in a humid chamber before being air-dried. Slides were fixed with 2% formaldehyde (Vrana et al., 2012), dehydrated in a series of ethanol treatments (70%, 90% and 100%) and air-dried.

Probe Preparation

The 18S rDNA was obtained from genomic DNA of Triticum aestivum by PCR with primers 5’-AACCTGGTT GATCCTGCCAGT-3’ (forward) and 5’-CCATCAGAACTCCGCAGTTA-3’ (reverse) (Matoba et al., 2007) and labelled through nick translation with DEAC-5-dUTP (Perkin Elmer, NEL455001EA). For 5S rDNA, produced from genomic DNA of Brassica oleraceae by PCR with primers 5’-GATCCCATCAGAACTCC-3’ (forward) and 5’-GGTGCTTTAGTGCTG GTAT-3’ (reverse) (Koo et al., 2002) and labelled by nick translation with Alexa Fluor ® 488-5-dUTP (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). Following the methods of Abd El-Twab and Kondo (2006), Arabidopsis-type telomere sequence was PCR-amplified, in the absence of the genomic template DNA, using primers (TTTAGGG)5 and (CCCTAAA)5 and amplicons were labelled with Texas Red-5-dUTP (Perkin Elmer, NEL417001EA).

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

The hybridization mixture consisted of 100% formamide, 50% dextran sulfate, 20×SSC, 50 ng·µL-1 of each DNA probe and DNase-free water (Sigma, W4502). The mixture was denatured at 90°C for 10 min and placed on ice for at least 5 min. 40 µL volume of mixture was placed on microscope slide and sealed with cover slip. Slides were further denatured at 80°C for 5 min and incubated overnight in a humid chamber at 37°C. Following the overnight hybridization, slides were washed in 2×SSC at room temperature for 10 min, 0.1×SSC at 42°C for 25 min, 2×SSC at room temperature for 5 min and before being dehydrated with ethanol series (70%, 90% and 100%) at room temperature. Slides were counterstained with DAPI (1 µg·µL-1) in Vectashield (Vector Labs, H-1000).

Chromosomes were observed under an Olympus BX53 fluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan) using oil lens (x100 magnification) equipped with a built-in CCD camera (CoolSNAPcf). Images were captured and analyzed with Cytovision version 7.2 (Leica Microsystems, Germany) and images were processed using Adobe Photoshop CS6. Chromosomes were measured using ImageJ software (Scheider et al., 2012) and classified according to the methods described by Waminal and Kim (2012). Homologous chromosomes were identified based on their FISH signals, morphological characteristics and length.

Results

We used the three highly conserved DNA repeat sequences in plants, the 45S and 5S rDNAs and the Arabidopsis-type telomeric repeat, as probes for triple-color FISH karyotype analysis. Different distribution pattern on somatic metaphase chromosomes was observed among the three curcubit species. In Cucumis melo var. flexuosus, two pairs of 45S rDNA were observed on the paracentromeric region of the long arm of chromosome 3 and almost on the entire region of the short arm of chromosome 10 (Fig. 1A1). The 5S rDNA loci were observed on the intercalary region of the long arm of chromosome 8 (Fig. 1A2). Telomeric repeats were detected on the terminal region of both short and long arms of all chromosomes (Fig. 1A3).

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2018-036-03/N0130360311/images/Figure_HST_36_03_10_F1.jpg

Fig. 1. Triple-color FISH metaphase spreads of Cucumis melo var. flexuosus (A), Melothria pendula (B) and Trichosanthes anguina. The signals of 45S rDNA (left panels), 5S rDNA (middle panels) and telomeric repeat (right panels) are shown in blue, green and red, respectively. Scale bar = 10 µm.

In Melothria pendula, four pairs of 45S and two pairs of 5S rDNA loci were detected. Three pairs of 45S rDNA were independently localized on the paracentromeric region of chromosome 1, the terminal region of chromosome 2 and the intercalary region of chromosome 7 (Fig. 1B1). The largest 45S rDNA signal was in chromosome 1 (Fig. 2B). The 5S rDNA loci were observed on chromosomes 5 and 11 (Fig. 1B2). In chromosome 5, 5S rDNA was juxtaposed with 45S rDNA on the intercalary region of short arm (Fig. 2B). Li et al. (2016) have reported the presence of only one pair of 5S rDNA and two pairs of 45S rDNA in M. pendula using FISH. This discrepancy is likely due to experimental conditions and poor hybridization of probe that was considered as one major disadvantage of in situ hybridization method (Schubert et al., 1998; Kubota et al., 2006; Cuyacot et al., 2016). Telomeric signals were distributed on all M. pendula chromosome termini (Fig. 1B3).

Different rDNA distribution pattern was observed in the genome of Trichosanthes anguina with three pairs of 45S and two pairs of 5S rDNA loci. The 45S rDNA loci were detected on the terminal region of the long arm of chromosomes 5-7 (Fig. 1C1). One pair of 5S rDNA localized on the intercalary region of the long arm of chromosome 9 (Fig. 1C2). In chromosome 6, the 5S rDNA was co-localized with 45S rDNA on the terminal region of the chromosome (Fig. 3C). Telomeric signals were all detected on the terminal region of all chromosomes (Fig. 1C3).

The FISH-based karyotypes of the three exotic cucurbit species were analyzed to elucidate their chromosome compositions. All three cucurbit species were diploid with considerably small chromosomes, with this result being consistent with previous reports investigating different cucurbit species (Waminal et al., 2011; Waminal and Kim, 2012; Waminal and Kim, 2015). The chromosomes were paired and arranged according to the probe signals and length in descending order (Fig. 2). Karyotypic idiograms of the three species are shown in Fig. 3. The chromosome complement of C. melo var. flexuosus was 2n=2x=24, with lengths ranging from 1.5 to 2.2 µm and composed of seven metacentric, four submetacentric and one subtelocentric pairs. In M. pendula, the chromosome complement was 2n=2x=24 with chromosome lengths ranging from 1.8 to 2.5 µm. M. pendula was comprised of nine metacentric and three submetacentric chromosomal pairs. The chromosome complement of T. anguina was 2n=2x=22 with chromosome lengths ranging from 3.2 to 5.4 µm, and it was composed of nine metacentric and two submetacentric homologous pairs. Chromosome number, length, karyotype formula and FISH signal distribution are summarized in Table 1.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2018-036-03/N0130360311/images/Figure_HST_36_03_10_F2.jpg

Fig. 2. Triple-color FISH karyogram of Cucumis melovar. flexuosus (A), Melothria pendula (B) and Trichosanthes anguina showing chromosomes in descending length order. 45S rDNA, 5S rDNA and telomeric repeat DNA signals are indicated in blue, green and red, respectively. Co-localization of 45S and 5S rDNA signals were observed in chromosome 5 of M. pendula and chromosome 6 of T. anguina, a common feature within Cucurbitaceae family. Scale bar = 5 µm.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2018-036-03/N0130360311/images/Figure_HST_36_03_10_F3.jpg

Fig. 3. Triple-color FISH idiogram of C. melo var. flexuosus (A), M. pendula (B), and T. anguina depicting the signals of 45S rDNA (blue), 5S rDNA (green) and telomeric repeats (red).

Table 1. Summary of chromosome composition and rDNA distribution of the three exotic cucurbit species http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2018-036-03/N0130360311/images/Table_HST_36_03_11_T1.jpg

zNumber of signal.

yChromosome number.

xMetacentric.

wSubmetacentric.

vSubtelocentric.

Discussion

The three exotic cucurbit species, Cucumis melo var. flexuosus (L.) Naudin (2n=24), Melothria pendula L. (2n=24), and Trichosanthes anguina L. (2n=22), are distributed across the tropical and subtropical Korean peninsula and have been utilized for their medicinal properties and in crop production (Bullock, 1990; Lira and Caballero, 2002; Ojiako and Igwe, 2008; Rai et al., 2008).

FISH procedures, using ribosomal rRNA genes (rDNAs) and other DNA repeat probes, have allowed the characterization of chromosome and genome composition of various species (Leitch and Heslop-Harrison, 1992; Devi et al., 2005; Kato et al., 2005; Belandres et al., 2015). Additionally, FISH is a powerful method to revealing chromosomal rearrangements over evolutionary time and enabling the description of phylogenetic relationships between species (Devi et al., 2005; Coluccia et al., 2011; Li et al., 2016). For example, cytogenetic reports using FISH supported the possible chromosome fusion of ancestral chromosomes in Cucumis sativus (x=7) after divergence from C. melo (Koo et al., 2010), and revealed the close evolutionary distance among cultivated watermelons (Li et al., 2016).

Tandem arrays of 45S and 5S ribosomal DNAs are highly conserved in eukaryotes (Hasterok et al., 2001). Distribution of telomeric repeats, although not as conserved as the rDNA, is of particular interest to describing evolutionary relationship (Blackburn, 1991; Fuchs et al., 1995). Recently, rDNA loci were investigated by FISH in more than 1,000 species (Garcia et al., 2012) providing key information on genome structure and inter-specific relationships that will in turn improve breeding designs.

The family Cucurbitaceae has the most common basic chromosome number of 11 or 12 (Whitaker, 1933; Beevy and Kuriachan, 1996; Schaefer and Renner, 2010; Waminal and Kim, 2015). The three cucurbits, investigated in this study, also verify this chromosome number. The observed variation in chromosome number in Cucurbitaceae family (Whitaker, 1933; Jeffrey, 1967; Jeffrey, 1980) is a common feature among angiosperms (Dodsworth et al., 2015). Polyploidization and subsequent diploidization events are often related to genome amplifications and shrinkage, chromosomal translocations or even loss of chromosomal segments (Bruggmann et al., 2006; Dodsworth et al., 2016). As a consequence, such events are often associated with loss or gain of rDNA signals (Mishima et al., 2002). For example, chromosome fusion of several chromosomes in the ancestral genome of cucumber resulted in the reduction of the chromosome number in C. sativus (x=7) after the divergence from C. melo (x=12) ( Koo et al., 2010). A fusion event is likely to associate with the chromosome number of T. anguina.

The most frequent localization of 45S and 5S rDNA in the three cucurbits species were in distal and interstitial regions, respectively. Independent rDNA position most often leads to a more efficient gene conversion and unequal crossing-over without disruptive interference (Martins and Galetti Jr, 1999; Martins and Galetti Jr, 2001; Koo et al., 2010). The interstitial localization of 5S rDNA loci could stabilize the tandem repeats, whereas 45S rDNA resides on terminal region are prone to dispersion in the genome during chromosomal rearrangement (Waminal and Kim, 2012; Reddy et al., 2013). The polymorphism of rDNA gene loci and merging of some repeats indicate the occurrence of genomic reorganization during speciation within the Cucurbitaceae family (Datson and Murray, 2006; Książczyk et al., 2010, Cuyacot et al., 2017).

The rDNA site distribution of the three cucurbits studied here provide information on their genome structure and organization that may be useful to improve breeding programs of other related cucurbit species (Renner et al., 2007). Advanced cytogenetic molecular analysis employing either cucurbit- or species-specific DNA sequence as cytogenetic markers could refine chromosome identification and further elucidate phylogenetic relationships among species.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant from National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF- 2011-0023156).

References

1
Abd El-Twab MH, Kondo K (2006) FISH physical mapping of 5S, 45S and Arabidopsis-type telomere sequence repeats in Chrysanthemum zawadskii showing intra-chromosomal variation and complexity in nature. Chromosom Bot 1:1-5. doi:10.3199/iscb.1.1
2
Albert PS, Gao Z, Danilova TV, Birchler JA (2010) Diversity of chromosomal karyotypes in maize and its relatives. Cytogenet Genom Res 129:6-16. doi:10.1159/000314342
3
Antão CM, Malcata FX (2005) Plant serine proteases: biochemical, physiological and molecular features. Plant Physiol Biochem 43:637- 650. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2005.05.001
4
Beevy SS, Kuriachan P (1996) Chromosome numbers of south Indian Cucurbitaceae and a note on the cytological evolution in the family. J Cytol Genet 31:65-71
5
Belandres HR, Waminal NE, Hwang YJ, Park BS, Lee SS, Huh JH, Kim HH (2015) FISH karyotype and GISH meiotic pairing analyses of a stable intergeneric hybrid×Brassica oraphanus line BB# 5. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 33:83-92. doi:10.7235/hort.2015.14151
6
Benavente E, Cifuentes M, Dusautoir JC, David J (2008) The use of cytogenetic tools for studies in the crop-to-wild gene transfer scenario. Cytogenet Genom Res 120:384-395. doi:10.1159/000121087
7
Blackburn EH (1991) Structure and function of telomeres. Nature 350:569-573
8
Bohnert HJ, Nelson DE, Jensen RG (1995) Adaptations to environmental stresses. Plant Cell 7:1099-1111
9
Bruggmann R, Bharti AK, Gundlach H, Lai J, Young S, Pontaroli AC, Wei F, Haberer G, Fuks G, et al (2006) Uneven chromosome contraction and expansion in the maize genome. Genome Res 16:1241-1251. doi:10.1101/gr.5338906
10
Bullock SH (1990) Abundance and allometrics of vines and self-supporting plants in a tropical deciduous forest. Biotropica 22:106-109. doi:10.2307/2388726
11
Coluccia E, Pichiri G, Nieddu M, Coni P, Manconi S, Deiana A, Salvadori S, Mezzanotte R (2011) Identification of two new repetitive elements and chromosomal mapping of repetitive DNA sequences in the fish Gymnothorax unicolor (Anguilliformes: Muraenidae). Eur J Histochem 55:12. doi:10.4081/ejh.2011.e12
12
Cuyacot AR, Won SY, Park SK, Sohn SH, Lee J, Kim JS, Kim HH, Lim K-B, Hwang Y-J (2016) The chromosomal distribution of repetitive DNA sequences in Chrysanthemum boreale revealed a characterization in its genome. Sci Hortic 198:438-444. doi:10.1016/ j.scienta.2015.12.025
13
Cuyacot AR, Lim KB, Kim HH, Hwang YJ (2017) Chromosomal characterization based on repetitive DNA distribution in a tetraploid cytotype of Chrysanthemum zawadskii. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 58:488-494. doi:10.1007/s13580-017-0280-4
14
Datson PM, Murray BG (2006) Ribosomal DNA locus evolution in Nemesia: transposition rather than structural rearrangement as the key mechanism? Chromosom Res 14:845-857. doi:10.1007/s10577-006-1092-z
15
Delannay IY, Staub JE, Chen JF (2010) Backcross introgression of the Cucumis hystrix genome increases genetic diversity in US processing cucumber. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 135:351-361
16
Devi J, Ko J, Seo B (2005) FISH and GISH: Modern cytogenetic techniques. Indian J Biotechnol 4:307-315
17
Dodsworth S, Chase MW, Leitch AR (2016) Is post polyploidization diploidization the key to the evolutionary success of angiosperms? Bot J Linn Soc 180:1-5. doi:10.1111/boj.12357
18
Dodsworth S, Leitch AR, Leitch IJ (2015) Genome size diversity in angiosperms and its influence on gene space. Curr Opin Genet Dev 35: 73-78. doi:10.1016/j.gde.2015.10.006
19
Fuchs J, Brandes A, Schubert I (1995) Telomere sequence localization and karyotype evolution in higher plants. Plant Syst Evol 196: 227-241. doi:10.1007/BF00982962
20
Garcia S, Garnatje T, Kovařík A (2012) Plant rDNA database: ribosomal DNA loci information goes online. Chromosoma 121:389-394. doi:10.1007/s00412-012-0368-7
21
Hasterok R, Jenkins G, Langdon T, Jones RN, Maluszynska J (2001) Ribosomal DNA is an effective marker of Brassica chromosomes. Theoret Appl Genetics 103:486-490. doi:10.1007/s001220100653
22
Heslop-Harrison J (1991) The molecular cytogenetics of plants. J Cell Sci 100:5-21
23
Huang S, Li R, Zhang Z, Li L, Gu X, Fan W, Lucas WJ, Wang X, Xie B, et al (2009) The genome of the cucumber, Cucumis sativus L. Nature Genet 41:1275-1281. doi:10.1038/ng.475
24
Icso D, Molnar-Lang M, Linc G (2014) Constructing an alternative wheat karyotype using barley genomic DNA. J Appl Genet. doi:10.1007/s13353-014-0230-0:45-48
25
Jeffrey C (1967) On the classification of Cucurbitaceae. Kew Bull 20:417-426. doi:10.2307/4108235
26
Jeffrey C (1980) A review of the Cucurbitaceae. Bot J Linn Soc 81:233-247. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1980.tb01676.x
27
Jeffrey CS (2005) A new system of Cucurbitaceae. Bot Zhurn 90:332-335
28
Kato A, Vega JM, Han F, Lamb JC, Birchler JA (2005) Advances in plant chromosome identification and cytogenetic techniques. Curr Opin Plant Biol 8:148-154. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.014
29
Koo DH, Hur Y, Jin DC, Bang JW (2002) Karyotype analysis of a Korean cucumber cultivar (Cucumis sativus L. cv. Winter Long) using C-banding and bicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization. Mol Cells 13:413-418
30
Koo DH, Nam YW, Choi D, Bang JW, de Jong H, Hur Y (2010) Molecular cytogenetic mapping of Cucumis sativus and C. melo using highly repetitive DNA sequences. Chromosom Res 18:325-336. doi:10.1007/s10577-010-9116-0
31
Książczyk T, Taciak M, Zwierzykowski Z (2010) Variability of ribosomal DNA sites in Festuca pratensis, Lolium perenne, and their intergeneric hybrids, revealed by FISH and GISH. J Appl Genet 51:449-460. doi:10.1007/BF03208874
32
Kubota K, Ohashi A, Imachi H, Harada H (2006) Improved in situ hybridization efficiency with locked-nucleic-acid-incorporated DNA probes. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:5311-5317. doi:10.1128/AEM.03039-05
33
Lee HS, Huang PL, Kung HF, Li BQ, Huang PL, Huang P, Huang HI, Chen HC (1991) TAP 29: an anti-human immunodeficiency virus protein from Trichosanthes kirilowii that is nontoxic to intact cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:6570-6574. doi:10.1073/pnas.88.15.6570
34
Lee JM (1994) Cultivation of grafted vegetables I. Current status, grafting methods, and benefits. HortScience 29:235-239
35
Lee Tb (2003) Coloured flora of Korea. Vol. I, II. Hyangmunsa, Seoul, Korea, pp 774-780
36
Leitch I, Heslop-Harrison J (1992) Physical mapping of the 18S-5.8 S-26S rRNA genes in barley by in situ hybridization. Genome 35: 1013-1018. doi:10.1139/g92-155
37
Li KP, Wu YX, Zhao H, Wang Y, Lü XM, Wang JM, Xu Y, Li ZY, Han YH (2016) Cytogenetic relationships among Citrullus species in comparison with some genera of the tribe Benincaseae (Cucurbitaceae) as inferred from rDNA distribution patterns. BMC Evol Biol 16:1. doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0656-6
38
Liao PC, Tsai CC, Chou CH, Chiang YC (2012) Introgression between cultivars and wild populations of Momordica charantia L. (Cucurbitaceae) in Taiwan. Int J Mol Sci 13:6469-6491. doi:10.3390/ijms13056469
39
Lira R, Caballero J (2002) Ethnobotany of the wild Mexican Cucurbitaceae1. Econ Bot 56:380-398. doi:10.1663/0013-0001(2002)056 [0380:EOTWMC]2.0.CO;2
40
Martins C, Galetti Jr PM (1999) Chromosomal localization of 5S rDNA genes in Leporinus fish (Anostomidae, Characiformes). Chromosom Res 7:363-367. doi:10.1023/A:1009216030316
41
Martins C, Galetti Jr PM (2001) Organization of 5S rDNA in species of the fish Leporinus: two different genomic locations are characterized by distinct nontranscribed spacers. Genome 44:903-910. doi:10.1139/g01-069
42
Matoba H, Mizutani T, Nagano K, Hoshi Y, Uchiyama H (2007) Chromosomal study of lettuce and its allied species (Lactuca spp., Asteraceae) by means of karyotype analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Hereditas 144:235-243. doi:10.1111/j.2007. 0018-0661.02012x
43
Mayer RA, Sergios PA, Coonan K, O'Brien L (1992) Trichosanthin treatment of HIV-induced immune dysregulation. Eur J Clin Invest 22: 113-122. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.1992.tb01944.x
44
McGrath MS, Hwang KM, Caldwell SE, Gaston I, Luk KC, Wu P, Ng VL, Crowe S, Daniels J, et al (1989) GLQ223: an inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus replication in acutely and chronically infected cells of lymphocyte and mononuclear phagocyte lineage. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:2844-2848
45
Mishima M, Ohmido N, Fukui K, Yahara T (2002) Trends in site-number change of rDNA loci during polyploid evolution in Sanguisorba (Rosaceae). Chromosoma 110:550-558. doi:10.1007/s00412-001-0175-z
46
Ojiako O, Igwe C (2008) The nutritive, anti-nutritive and hepatotoxic properties of Trichosanthes anguina (snake tomato) fruits from Nigeria. Pak J Nutr 7:85-89
47
Qian C-L, Qi X-H, Yang J-H, Zhang M-F (2012) Molecular phylogeny of Chinese snakegourd (Trichosanthes kirilowii Maxim) based on cytological and AFLP analyses. Caryologia 65:216-222. doi:10.1080/00087114.2012.735898
48
Rai M, Pandey S, Kumar S, Pitrat M (2008) Cucurbit research in India: a retrospect. IIVR. 285-294
49
Reddy UK, Aryal N, Islam-Faridi N, Tomason YR, Levi A, Nimmakayala P (2013) Cytomolecular characterization of rDNA distribution in various Citrullus species using fluorescent in situ hybridization. Genet Resour Crop Evol 60:2091-2100. doi:10.1007/s10722-013- 9976-1
50
Renner SS, Schaefer H, Kocyan A (2007) Phylogenetics of Cucumis (Cucurbitaceae): cucumber (C. sativus) belongs in an Asian/Australian clade far from melon (C. melo). BMC Evol Biol 7:58. doi:10.1186/1471-2148-7-58
51
Sain RS, Joshi P, Divakara Sastry EV (2002) Cytogenetic analysis of interspecific hybrids in genus Citrullus (Cucurbitaceae). Euphytica 128: 205-210. doi:10.1023/A:1020800113252
52
Schaefer H, Renner S (2010) Cucurbitaceae. In flowering plants eudicots. Springer, Berlin,Germany, pp 112-174. doi:10.1007/978-3- 642-14397-7_10
53
Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW (2012) NIH Image to Image J: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 9:671-675
54
Schubert I, Shi F, Fuchs J, Endo TR (1998) An efficient screening for terminal deletions and translocations of barley chromosomes added to common wheat. Plant J 14:489-495. doi:10.1046/j.1365-313X.1998.00125.x
55
Shengping Z, Xingfang G, Ye W (2006) Effect of bur cucumber (Sicyos angulatus L.) as rootstock on growth physiology and stress resistance of cucumber plants. Acta Hortic Sin 33:1231-1236
56
Sybenga J (2012) Cytogenetics in plant breeding. Springer Sci. Bus. Media. Dreijenlaan, Vol 7. HA Wageningen, Netherlands. pp 1-10. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-84083-8
57
Tzonev R (2005) Sicyos angulatus (Cucurbitaceae): a new adventive species for the flora of Bulgaria. Phytol Balcan 11:67-68
58
Uchikoba T, Hosoyamada S, Onjyo M, Arima K, Yonezawa H, Kaneda M (2001) A serine endopeptidase from the fruits of Melothria japonica (Thunb.) Maxim. Phytochemistry 57:1-5. doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00511-2
59
Vrana J, Simkova H, Kubalakova M, Cihalikova J, Dolezel J (2012) Flow cytometric chromosome sorting in plants: the next generation. Methods 57:331-337. doi:10.1016/j.ymeth.2012.03.006
60
Waminal NE, Kim HH (2012) Dual-color FISH karyotype and rDNA distribution analyses on four Cucurbitaceae species. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 53:49-56. doi:10.1007/s13580-012-0105-4
61
Waminal NE, Kim HH (2015) FISH karyotype analysis of four wild Cucurbitaceae species using 5S and 45S rDNA probes and the emergence of new polyploids in Trichosanthes kirilowii Maxim. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 33:869-876. doi:10.7235/hort.2015. 15101
62
Waminal NE, Kim NS, Kim HH (2011) Dual-color FISH karyotype analyses using rDNAs in three Cucurbitaceae species. Genes Genomics 33:521-528. doi:10.1007/s13258-011-0046-9
63
Weng Y, Sun Z (2012) Major cucurbit crops. In YH Wang, TK Behera, C Kole (ed.) Genetics, Genomics and Breeding of Cucurbits. Science Publishers, New Hampshire, USA, pp 1-16
64
Whitaker TW (1933) Cytological and phylogenetic studies in the Cucurbitaceae. Bot Gaz 780-790. doi:10.1086/334347
65
Zhuang FY, Chen JF, Staub JE, Qian CT (2006) Taxonomic relationships of a rare Cucumis species (C. hystrix Chakr.) and its interspecific hybrid with cucumber. HortScience 41:571-574
페이지 상단으로 이동하기