Horticultural Science and Technology. 31 December 2015. 932-940
https://doi.org/10.7235/hort.2015.14193

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   Seed and Chemical Materials

  •   Experimental Design

  •   Hydration and Incubation

  •   Evaluation of Germination

  •   Statistical Analysis

  • Results

  •   Effect of Priming on Seedling Vigor

  •   Days to Percentage Germination vs Germination Rate

  •   Effect of Priming on Shoot Height and Fresh Weight

  • Discussion

Introduction

Seed germination is a crucial factor for commercial agri-culture and substantial work has examined the conditions required for optimal germination. In the early 1950s, optimal soil temperatures for diploid seed germination were established in the range of 21-35°C (Harrington and Minges, 1954). Since then, new hybrid cultivars have replaced open-pollinated cultivars and new cultivars were found to respond to different temperature ranges. For proper seed germination, growth, and development, diploid watermelon requires warmer than 26°C (Whitaker and Davis, 1962), but triploid seeds originating from tetra-ploid ovaries require 24-38°C for 24-72 h. Triploid seedless watermelon was first developed in Japan in the early 1950s (Kihara, 1951). Triploid seedless watermelon has been becoming popular over the last two decades due to its crisp and sweet taste without the hard seeds of standard watermelon (Egel, 1999; Marr and Gast, 1991). Triploids result from breeding between a tetraploid watermelon, as the female parent, and a diploid watermelon, as the male parent. Triploid watermelon does not produce sufficient pollen for fertilization; thus the production of triploid seedless fruits requires a diploid plant for pollen (Maynard and Elmstrom, 1992; Zhang, 2004).

Watermelon growers face various problems in obtaining good seed germination, as triploid seeds have low germination due to the thicker seed coat, underdeveloped embryos, and larger air space cavities compared with diploids (Duval and NeSmith, 2000; Grange et al., 2000, 2003). Triploid seed germination is generally low, at 60-80% compared to up to 95% in diploid (Liu et al., 2010; Nerson et al., 1985). Heavy seeds germinate better because of higher seed coat tissue compared to light-weight seeds in triploids (Yang and Sung, 1994). Methods such as nicking, scarification and lateral splitting of seed coat enhance the germination rate in triploid, but also can injure the embryo (Duval and Nesmith, 1998; Grange et al., 2000). Hence, there is a need to explore more efficient and reliable methods to enhance seed germination rate and seedling establishment, as normal germination methods no longer produce good results, especially in tetraploids and triploids.

Seed priming has been reported to enhance seed germi-nation performance of various field crops (Eskandari, 2013; Shehzad et al., 2012). Various seed priming methods can improve germination; these methods include hydropriming (Huang et al., 2002; Moghanibashi et al., 2012), which improves germination by partially hydrating seeds, although radicle emergence does not occur. Other priming methods include halopriming (Siadat et al., 2011), osmopriming (Chen et al., 2010; Esmaelli and Heidarzade, 2012; Farooq et al., 2005, 2007; Rezaei and Ramezani, 2012; Rouhi et al., 2011), thermopriming (Yari et al., 2012), solid matrix priming (Mereddy et al., 2000), and biopriming (Moenzadeh et al., 2010). The growth regulator gibberellic acid (GA) can improve seed germination rates and reduce germination time in endive and chicory (Ghodrat and Rousta, 2012; Tzortzakis, 2009). The application of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) enhanced germination efficiency with no effect on seed coat (Duval and NeSmith, 2000). Hydrogen peroxide has been suggested to mediate imbibition and hydrolytic activities required for germination and alleviate salt and temperature stresses (Çavusoglu andKabar, 2010). Fusicoccin (FC), from Fusicoccum amygdali is a novel 5-8-5 membrane tricyclic diterpene glucoside. It is a potent promoter of germination and dormancy-breaking agent. The mode of action of FC on plant 14-3-3 proteins and H+-ATPase are currently attracting substantial attention (Tajima et al., 2004). FC induced cell wall loosening and thus loss of turgor and cell enlargement by stimulating H+ extrusion and K+ uptake similarly to, but much more strongly than auxin (Marre, 1979).

The information on seed germination, emergence and uniform growth in polyploid watermelon remains inadequate, despite the different priming and seed treatment methods studied so far. Hence, this study was carried out to investi-gate the priming effects of different concentrations of chemicals, including H2O2, FC, and GA, on germination and seedling uniformity of triploid and diploid watermelon.

Materials and Methods

Seed and Chemical Materials

The experimental materials included seeds of three triploid cultivars, Seedless Plus (Nong Woo Bio Co., Suwon, Korea), Sinus (L & S Seed Company, Cheongju, Korea), and Sizero (Syngenta, Bangkok, Thailand). Sambokggul, diploid cultivar, was used as a control. These were subjected to hydropriming testing at the Watermelon Experiment Station, Daesan, Gochang during the year 2013. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), fusicoccin (FC), and giberrelic acid (GA) were tested as germination-enhancing agents. Different concentrations of H2O2 (2, 4%), FC (1, 5, 10 μM) and GA (1, 5, and 10 μM), water (H2O), and a control condition were used to analyze the effect on germination rate of seeds.

Experimental Design

The experiment was conducted as a three-factor compact family block design (CRBD) randomized with three repli-ca-tions and ten types of treatments: one water, two con-cent-rations of H2O2, three of FC, three of GA, and one control. However, the 4% H2O2 treatment was omitted for cultivar Seedless Plus due to insufficient seeds. Each replication contained twenty-five seeds of each cultivar.

Hydration and Incubation

Twenty-five seeds per replication for each treatment were weighed. The seeds were gathered together on 22 × 22 cm squares of muslin gauze cloth, then wrapped and tied using thread attached to a unique number for each treatment (Seedless Plus V1, Sinus V2, Sizero V3, and Sambokggul V4). The gauze-wrapped seeds were soaked in centrifuge tubes containing 15 ml of each respective concentration of solution for 12 hours and kept at room temperature (Fig. 1). Imbibed seeds were rinsed with distilled water prior to incubation at 31 ± 2°C with 35% relative humidity until seeds were dried to their original seed weight (around 48 hours).

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2015-033-06/N0130330616/images/figure_KSHS_33_06_16_F1.jpg

Fig. 1. The process of hydration and incubation during seed priming treatment. A, seeds on the muslin gauze cloth; B, seeds soaked in each solution at room temperature after being wrapped and tied up using thread attached to a label with a unique number; C, and washed seeds allowed to dry to their original seed weight prior to incubation.

Evaluation of Germination

Primed seeds were sown in plastic trays containing commercial soil mixture and raised in a plastic house. The temperature and humidity were recorded every hour using a data log. The average temperature and humidity at day/night were 32 ± 8°C and 62 ± 21%/24 ± 2°C and 93 ± 8%, respectively. Seeds were considered germinated upon the protrusion of the cotyledon above the soil. After the third day, the number of germinated seeds was recorded daily for two weeks. The time to 50% germination (T50) was calculated according to the modified formula reported by Farooq et al. (2005) in Equation 1, and the final germi-nation percentage (FGP) was estimated using Equation 2. The germination index was calculated based on the formula described by the Association of Official Seed Analysts (AOSA, 1983) and used by Farooq et al. (2005) in Equation 3. Shoot length (cm) and seed weight (g) were recorded on the last day of observation and 20% of maximal and minimal height seedlings were dropped out.

Equation 1

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2015-033-06/N0130330616/images/PIC3521.gif

N = the final number of germinated seeds; nj , ni: cumulative number of seeds germinated by adjacent counts at times tj and ti when ni < N/2 < nj.

Equation 2

FGP =

Total No. of germinated seeds

 × 100

Total No. of seed evaluated

Equation 3

GI =

No. of germinated seeds

+ ---- +

No. of germinated seeds

Days of first count

Days of final count

Statistical Analysis

The data were analyzed using the statistiXL program for general statistical analysis. For each of the measured variables, comparison of means or medians was conducted through a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) to determine whether differences are statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05). Means of treatments were separated by Fisher’s LSD test at p ≤ 0.05.

Results

Effect of Priming on Seedling Vigor

The different priming and non-priming treatments showed significant effects on the seedling vigor of triploids (Table 1). FGP was significantly different and higher in primed seeds compared to control in the triploids but not in the diploid. Seedless Plus had a higher FGP with 5 μM GA (68%), Sinus with hydroprimed (81.3%), Sizero with both hydroprimed (86.7%) and GA 5 μM (86.7%), and Sambokggul with hydro-primed (98.7%) all showed higher FGP compared with the control treatment. However, time to 50% germination did not show a statistically significant difference among triploid and diploid cultivars. A significant difference in GI was found only in Sizero with hydroprimed treatment (4.6) compared with the control treatment (3.5).

Table 1. The effects of different priming treatments on seedling vigor of triploid and diploid cultivars on the basis of FGP, T50, and GI.

Treatments

FGPz (%)

T50y

GIx

Seedless Plus Sinus Sizero Sambokggul

Seedless Plus Sinus Sizero Sambokggul

Seedless Plus Sinus Sizero Sambokggul

Control

53.3

58.7

73.3

97.3

6.2

4.1

4.9

4.2

2.3

3.3

3.5

5.4

H2O

54.7

81.3

86.7

98.7

5.6

3.7

4.5

4.6

2.3

5.0

4.6

 .9

H2O2 (2%)

40.0

45.3

60.0

76.0

5.0

3.8

4.9

6.6

1.9

2.7

2.9

3.0

H2O2 (4%)

-

44.0

49.3

86.7

4.2

5.4

7.2

-

2.5

2.1

2.9

FC (1 μM)

42.7

69.3

80.0

93.3

5.0

4.2

4.4

4.7

2.1

4.3

4.1

4.6

FC (5 μM)

41.3

74.7

60.0

92.0

5.0

4.2

4.3

4.4

2.1

4.2

3.2

4.9

FC (10 μM)

41.3

58.7

74.7

94.7

4.4

4.2

4.6

5.1

2.1

3.4

3.8

4.5

GA (1 μM)

45.3

68.0

78.7

90.7

4.8

4.0

5.1

4.9

2.2

4.1

3.7

4.3

GA (5 μM)

68.0

68.0

86.7

94.7

5.0

4.2

5.0

4.6

3.2

3.8

4.1

4.8

GA (10 μM)

50.7

58.7

74.7

86.7

5.0

3.9

4.9

5.0

2.4

3.5

3.6

3.8

LSDv

14.5

20.3

12.6

-

-

-

 -

 -

 -

 -

1.3

 -

Values are means from three replicates.

zFinal germination percentage.

yTime to 50% germination.

xGermination index.

vLSD values at p ≤ 0.05.

Days to Percentage Germination vs Germination Rate

Germination rate (Table 2) was highest in Sizero (control, 73%; hydroprimed, 87%) followed by Sinus (control, 59%; hydroprimed, 81%) and Seedless Plus (control, 53%, FC 5 μM, 68%). In addition, seeds of Seedless plus treated with 1 μM FC started germinating within three days (1.3%), but seeds treated with 5 μM GA started germinating by the fourth day (21.3%). The maximum germination percentage 22.7% was attained within 3 days and reached to 81% FGP within 8 days in hydroprimed seed of Sinus; in other treatments FGP ranged from 44% to 71%. Seeds of hydro-primed Sizero began to germinate within 3 days, then the germination rate continuously increased, reaching 87% (FGP) on the 7th day of the first week. However, seeds primed with other treatments started germinating within 4 days with maximal germination rate at the 7th day, from 2% to 77% FGP.

Table 2. The effect of different priming treatments on percentage germination over time of diploid and triploid seeds.

Cultivar

Treatment

Percentage of seeds germinated by this day (%)

3rd

4th

5th

6th

7th

8th

9th

10th

11th

12th

13th

14th

Seedless Plus

Control

0.0±0.0z

9.3±5.3

26.7±11.9 

38.7±15.4

38.7±15.4

41.3±14.7

44.0±12.0

48.0±8.0

48.0±8.0

48.0±8.0

53.3±2.7

53.3±2.7

H2O

0.0±0.0

9.3±9.3

20.0±12.0

32.0±10.6

40.0±8.3

49.3±8.7

52.0±10.1

53.3±10.7

53.3±10.7

53.3±10.7

54.7±9.3

54.7±9.3

2% H2O2

0.0±0.0

6.7±1.3

22.7±3.5 

36.0±4.6

37.3±3.5

40.0±2.3

40.0±2.3

40.0±2.3

40.0±2.3

40.0±2.3

40.0±2.3

40.0±2.3

 1 μM FC

1.3±1.3 

13.3±7.1

28.0±12.2 

32.0±14.0

40.0±10.1

41.3±8.7

41.3±8.7

41.3±8.7

41.3±8.7

41.3±8.7

42.7±7.4

42.7±7.4

 5 μM FC

0.0±0.0

18.7±3.5 

26.7±7.4 

34.7±11.4

36.0±10.1

40.0±6.1

41.3±4.8

41.3±4.8

41.3±4.8

41.3±4.8

41.3±4.8

41.3±4.8

10 μM FC

0.0±0.0

13.3±1.3 

32.0±4.0

37.3±1.3

40.0±2.3

40.0±2.3

41.3±2.7

41.3±2.7

41.3±2.7

41.3±2.7

41.3±2.7

41.3±2.7

 1 μM GA

0.0±0.0

17.3±1.3 

28.0±6.1 

36.0±6.1

40.0±4.0

41.3±2.7

44.0±2.3

44.0±2.3

45.3±1.3

45.3±1.3

45.3±1.3

45.3±1.3

 5 μM GA

0.0±0.0

21.3±8.7 

33.3±12.7 

53.3±10.9

60.0±6.1

61.3±4.8

64.0±2.3

68.0±2.3

68.0±2.3

68.0±2.3

68.0±2.3

68.0±2.3

10 μM GA

0.0±0.0

10.7±1.3 

29.3±4.8 

40.0±9.2

48.0±4.6

49.3±3.5

49.3±3.5

50.7±4.8

50.7±4.8

50.7±4.8

50.7±4.8

50.7±4.8

Sinus

Control

4.0±2.3

38.7±19.6

45.3±13.1

50.7±8.1

53.3±8.7

53.3±8.7

58.7±3.5

58.7±3.5

58.7±3.5

58.7±3.5

58.7±3.5

58.7±3.5

H2O

22.7±11.4

49.3±12.7

65.3±9.3

77.3±1.3

80.0±2.3

81.3±3.5

81.3±3.5

81.3±3.5

81.3±3.5

81.3±3.5

81.3±3.5

81.3±3.5

2% H2O2

8.0±6.1

28.0±6.9

40.0±6.1

45.3±3.5

45.3±3.5

45.3±3.5

45.3±3.5

45.3±3.5

45.3±3.5

45.3±3.5

45.3±3.5

45.3±3.5

4% H2O2

1.3±1.3

20.0±2.3

41.3±1.3

44.0±2.3

44.0±2.3

44.0±2.3

44.0±2.3

44.0±2.3

44.0±2.3

44.0±2.3

44.0±2.3

44.0±2.3

 1 μM FC

13.3±4.8

53.3±14.8

57.3±14.7

64.0±12.2

69.3±8.7

69.3±8.7

69.3±8.7

69.3±8.7

69.3±8.7

69.3±8.7

69.3±8.7

69.3±8.7

 5 μM FC

13.3±7.1

40.0±14.0

52.0±12.2

62.7±13.3

68.0±12.0

70.7±9.3

73.3±8.7

74.7±9.6

74.7±9.6

74.7±9.6

74.7±9.6

74.7±9.6

10 μM FC

5.3±2.7

37.3±17.0

49.3±18.8

57.3±12.7

58.7±11.4

58.7±11.4

58.7±11.4

58.7±11.4

58.7±11.4

58.7±11.4

58.7±11.4

58.7±11.4

 1 μM GA

9.3±1.3

50.7±19.4

58.7±17.5

66.7±11.4

68.0±10.1

68.0±10.1

68.0±10.1

68.0±10.1

68.0±10.1

68.0±10.1

68.0±10.1

68.0±10.1

 5 μM GA

6.7±3.5

38.7±14.8

50.7±8.7

64.0±2.3

65.3±1.3

65.3±1.3

65.3±1.3

66.7±1.3

66.7±1.3

68.0±0.0

68.0±0.0

68.0±0.0

10 μM GA

9.3±5.3

37.3±10.4

53.3±2.7

56.0±4.6

56.0±4.6

57.3±5.8

57.3±5.8

57.3±5.8

57.3±5.8

57.3±5.8

58.7±5.8

58.7±5.8

Sizero

Control

0.0±0.0

13.3±1.3

42.7±8.1

65.3±4.8

70.7±5.3

73.3±2.7

73.3±2.7

73.3±2.7

73.3±2.7

73.3±2.7

73.3±2.7

73.3±2.7

H2O

4.0±4.0

30.7±13.5

64.0±18.3

84.0±6.1

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

2% H2O2

0.0±0.0

14.7±3.5

40.0±10.6

53.3±10.7

54.7±9.3

57.3±6.7

60.0±4.0

60.0±4.0

60.0±4.0

60.0±4.0

60.0±4.0

60.0±4.0

4% H2O2

0.0±0.0

1.3±1.3

14.7±1.3

40.0±2.3

42.7±2.7

46.7±4.8

49.3±4.8

49.3±4.8

49.3±4.8

49.3±4.8

49.3±4.8

49.3±4.8

 1 μM FC

0.0±0.0

25.3±9.3

58.7±9.6

73.3±7.4

77.3±5.3

78.7±4.8

80.0±4.6

80.0±4.6

80.0±4.6

80.0±4.6

80.0±4.6

80.0±4.6

 5 μM FC

0.0±0.0

32.0±8.0

46.7±13.5

56.0±8.3

57.3±7.1

58.7±7.4

58.7±7.4

58.7±7.4

58.7±7.4

58.7±7.4

60.0±6.1

60.0±6.1

10 μM FC

0.0±0.0

28.0±8.3

50.7±11.4

65.3±9.3

70.7±5.8

73.3±4.8

73.3±4.8

74.7±5.3

74.7±5.3

74.7±5.3

74.7±5.3

74.7±5.3

 1 μM GA

0.0±0.0

18.7±9.3

46.7±7.4

60.0±12.0

70.7±9.3

74.7±5.3

77.3±2.7

78.7±3.5

78.7±3.5

78.7±3.5

78.7±3.5

78.7±3.5

 5 μM GA

0.0±0.0

26.7±13.5

49.3±22.8

58.7±22.4

73.3±10.4

82.7±7.4

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

86.7±3.5

10 μM GA

0.0±0.0

22.7±8.1

50.7±9.6

57.3±13.9

62.7±9.3

69.3±8.7

69.3±8.7

73.3±4.8

73.3±4.8

73.3±4.8

74.7±3.5

74.7±3.5

Sambokggul

Control

9.3±7.4

56.0±28.1

70.7±27.4

85.3±12.7

92.0±6.1

94.7±3.5

97.3±1.3

97.3±1.3

97.3±1.3

97.3±1.3

97.3±1.3

97.3±1.3

H2

1.3±1.3

34.7±15.4

64.0±22.3

66.7±21.8

89.3±4.8

94.7±1.3

96.0±2.3

98.7±1.3

98.7±1.3

98.7±1.3

98.7±1.3

98.7±1.3

2% H2O2

0.0±0.0

2.7±2.7

20.0±2.3

40.0±10.6

57.3±18.8

61.3±16.7

69.3±12.7

74.7±7.4

74.7±7.4

74.7±7.4

76.0±8.0

76.0±8.0

4% H2O2

0.0±0.0

0.0±0.0

4.0±4.0

21.3±10.7

48.0±12.9

60.0±12.9

68.0±14.4

76.0±14.0

76.0±14.0

77.3±14.7

86.7±7.4

86.7±7.4

 1 μM FC

2.7±2.7

30.7±15.7

57.3±25.3

73.3±15.4

86.7±7.1

92.0±6.1

92.0±6.1

93.3±4.8

93.3±4.8

93.3±4.8

93.3±4.8

93.3±4.8

 5 μM FC

8.0±4.6

36.0±16.0

62.7±16.4

82.7±13.3

89.3±6.7

89.3±6.7

89.3±6.7

92.0±4.0

92.0±4.0

92.0±4.0

92.0±4.0

92.0±4.0

10 μM FC

0.0±0.0

18.7±10.4

58.7±27.6

73.3±24.7

88.0±10.1

88.0±10.1

94.7±3.5

94.7±3.5

94.7±3.5

94.7±3.5

94.7±3.5

94.7±3.5

 1 μM GA

0.0±0.0

20.0±11.5

54.7±21

70.7±15.4

86.7±7.4

89.3±4.8

89.3±4.8

90.7±3.5

90.7±3.5

90.7±3.5

90.7±3.5

90.7±3.5

 5 μM GA

0.0±0.0

32.0±18.5

62.7±23.4

82.7±15.4

90.7±9.3

93.3±6.7

93.3±6.7

94.7±5.3

94.7±5.3

94.7±5.3

94.7±5.3

94.7±5.3

10 μM GA

0.0±0.0

20.0±6.9

60.0±16.2

70.7±17.3

82.7±7.4

84.0±6.1

85.3±4.8

86.7±5.3

86.7±5.3

86.7±5.3

86.7±5.3

86.7±5.3

zValues are mean ± SE from three replicates.

Effect of Priming on Shoot Height and Fresh Weight

The shoot height and fresh weight of triploids and diploid cultivars also showed the effect of different priming treat-ments (Table 3). Seed priming consistently had no positive effect on shoot height among triploid cultivars. Control treatment had higher shoot height with 8.1, 9.0, 9.0 cm in Seedless Plus, Sinus, and Sizero, respectively, compared to the primed treatments. Although FC likely had positive effect on the growth of shoot height in Sambokggul with

Table 3. The effect of different priming treatments on shoot height (cm) and fresh weight (g) of seedlings of triploid and diploid cultivars

Treatments

Cont.

H2O

H2O2

FC

GA

P value

2%

4%

1 μM

5 μM

10 μM

1 μM

5 μM

10 μM

Seedless Plus

Number of seedlings

24

25

16

20

18

18

19

30

21

Shoot 

height

Means

8.1±0.5z

7.2±0.4

6±0.3

7.7±0.4

6.7±0.4

7.3±0.3

7.9±0.3

7±0.3

7.7±0.3

0.01

Variance

7.0

3.4

1.5

2.8

3.4

1.4

1.2

2.0

1.5

Fresh 

weight

Means

0.51±0.04

0.49±0.03

0.38±0.03

0.54±0.04

0.48±0.03

0.47±0.03

0.55±0.03

0.5±0.03

0.57±0.04

0.04

Variance

0.04 

0.03 

0.01 

0.04 

0.02 

0.01 

0.02 

0.02 

0.04 

Sinus

Number of seedlings

27

36

19

10

32

35

29

29

28

25

Shoot 

height

Means

9±0.4

8.7±0.3

6.3±0.4

4.3±0.3

8.8±0.3

7.6±0.3

7.1±0.4

8.3±0.3

8.8±0.3

9±0.3

1.27

Variance

4.44

3.49

2.78

0.97

3.17

3.33

3.84

3.07

2.92

2.17

Fresh 

weight

Means

0.7±0.06

0.72±0.06

0.45±0.03

0.27±0.03

0.6±0.03

0.56±0.03

0.48±0.03

0.61±0.04

0.63±0.04

0.69±0.04

1.87

Variance

0.10 

0.12 

0.02 

0.01 

0.04 

0.02 

0.02 

0.04 

0.05 

0.04 

Sizero

Number of seedlings

35

40

27

21

36

25

37

36

39

33

Shoot 

height

Means

9±0.2

8.8±0.2

5.8±0.3

4.7±0.2

8.4±0.2

7.8±0.3

7.1±0.3

7.2±0.5

7.2±0.3

7.4±0.3

3.19

Variance

1.89

2.01

1.88

0.81

1.29

2.40

2.59

7.22

4.35

3.05

Fresh 

weight

Means

0.61±0.03

0.77±0.03

0.47±0.03

0.44±0.03

0.8±0.06

0.63±0.04

0.62±0.03

0.57±0.04

0.6±0.04

0.61±0.05

8.24

Variance

0.03 

0.03 

0.02 

0.02 

0.13 

0.03 

0.03 

0.06 

0.06 

0.07 

Sambok-

ggul

Number of seedlings

43

47

36

41

42

43

45

41

43

39

Shoot 

height

Means

9.4±0.4

9.8±0.4

5.3±0.3

4.1±0.2

10.1±0.3

10.1±0.3

10.3±0.3

9.5±0.3

9.9±0.3

9.8±0.3

9.18

Variance

5.65

6.57

3.15

1.87

3.99

3.26

3.91

4.22

3.35

3.64

Fresh 

weight

Means

0.97 

weigh

0.94 

30.03h

0.56 

0.033h

0.41 

0.02h

1.06 

0.022h

1.07 

0.032h

1.04 

0.032h

0.92 

0.03h

0.93 

0.03h

0.86 

0.023h

1.28

Variance

0.17 

0.13 

0.04 

0.03 

0.11 

0.12 

0.08 

0.09 

0.07 

0.07 

a height of 10.1 cm (1 μM FC), 10.1 cm (5 μM FC), and 10.3 cm (10 μM FC) over the control treatment (9.4 cm), a significant effect was not found. Fresh weight of shoots showed a marginal difference in primed treatment with 2% H2O2 over the control, FC, and GA treatments among triploids and diploid cultivars with the exception Seedless Plus. Fresh weight was 0.38 g in seedlings from seeds treated with 2% H2O2, compared to 0.51 g in control, 0.54 g in 1 μM FC, 0.55 g in 1 μM GA, 0.5 g in 5 μM GA, and 0.57 g in 10 μM GA in Seedless Plus. Inconsistent differences were observed in treatments with FC and GA over the control treatment among all triploids and diploid cultivars.

All these differences in seedling vigor were suggested to be due to differences in shape and sizes of seeds, seed coat thickness, and air space cavity. Larger air spaces in seeds were observed in Sinus, followed by Seedless Plus, Sizero, and Sambokggul (Fig. 2). Seedlings of control vs primed seeds with 5 μM GA, which was the most effective in Seedless Plus, hydroprimed Sinus, and hydroprimed Sizero are shown in the Fig. 3.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2015-033-06/N0130330616/images/figure_KSHS_33_06_16_F2.jpg

Fig. 2. Differences in shape of triploid seeds showing larger airspace in comparison to diploid cultivar before and after imbibition. A-C, Diploid, Sambokggul; D-F, Triploid, Seedless Plus; G-I, Triploid, Sinus; J-L, Triploid, Sizero.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2015-033-06/N0130330616/images/figure_KSHS_33_06_16_F3.jpg

Fig. 3. Comparison of seedlings of control vs primed seeds; A, GA 5 μM in Seedless Plus; B, control vs hydroprimed Sinus; and C, and control vs hydroprimed Sizero.

Discussion

The present experimental findings showed that seed priming has a positive effect on the germination rate in all triploid cultivars and germination index (GI) in Sizero, whereas time to 50% germination (T50) showed no effect. In our study, seeds of triploids and diploids had some differences in seed shape and sizes, thickness of seed coat, and air space cavity and these factors led to variation in response to priming treatments, resulting in differences in germination ability. FGP increased in all triploid cultivars and GI increased in Sizero, but T50 showed no differences. The results revealed that Seedless plus showed better performance with 5 μM GA (FGP, 68%; GI, 3.2), Sinus with hydropriming (FGP, 81.3%; GI, 5.0), and Sizero with hydro-priming (FGP, 86.7%; GI, 4.6) treatments. Sambokggul showed the highest FGP 98.7% with hydropriming treatment whereas GI and T50 showed no effect of any primed treat-ment over the control. Germination rate was 68% after 13 days in Seedless plus with 5 μM GA, 81% within 8 days in Sinus with hydropriming, and 87% with 8 days in Sizero with hydropriming. Seed priming consistently had no effect on shoot height among triploid cultivars and fresh weight of shoots had a marginal difference of regression in seeds treated with 2% of H2O2 over the control among triploids and diploid cultivars, with the exception of Seedless Plus. In particular, it was noted that as the concentration of different treatments increased, there was corresponding negative impact on the seedling vigor of the triploids and diploid cultivars. Hence, concentration played key factor in controlling the germination behavior in triploids. It has been reported that priming techniques were applied successfully to improve germination rate, uniformity of germination, final germination, or shorten T50 (Eskandari and Kazemi, 2011; Moghamibashi et al., 2012); however, germination efficiency was found to vary with species and priming method (Selvarani and Umarani, 2011). This result was in agreement with the results of Huang et al. (2002), which showed that hydropriming was effective in triploid water-melon cultivar Guangxi. FC was found to accelerate metabolic processes (Lutsenko et al., 2005), transmembrane electric potential, and germination (Ajmal Khan et al., 2009; Ballarin- Denti and Cucucci, 1979; Gul and Weber, 1998; Simonovic et al., 2000).

The amount of seed material and its composition within the seed is presumably utilized to support seed coat splitting and seedling emergence. In triploids particularly, due to the weak embryo, the energy required to overcome the resistance of the thick seed coat and the overlying growth media would be limited to some extent, resulting in low emergence rate. Hence prior seed priming treatment, i.e. before the seed began growing in the nursery, helped to provide this energy to enhance germination performance. The present findings helped to find the optimal priming conditions for achieving improved germination of triploid watermelon. GA and hydropriming helped to break down seed dormancy and thus led to the enhancement of FGP and GI. It was concluded that hydropriming and 5 μM GA seed treatments could efficiently enhance germination in triploids. These seed priming treatments could be used on a large scale for industrial applications. Hydropriming is a simple, effective, and costless method for improving seed germination and seedling vigor of Sinus and Sizero.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from JBARES, IPET, and RDA. We gratefully acknowledge the help of technical staff members at Watermelon Experiment Station to successfully conduct this experiment.

References

1
Ajmal Khan, M., B. Gul, and D.J. Weber. 2009. Effect of germination regulating chemicals on seed germination of Halogeton glomeratus for alleviation of salinity stress. Pak. J. Bot. 41:1205-1212.
2
Ballarin-Dent, A. And M. Cucucci. 1979. Effect of abscisic acid, gibberellic acid and fusicoccin o the treatment potential during early phase of germination in radish (Raphnus sativus L.) seeds. Planta 1476:19-23.
3
Çavusoglu, K. and K. Kabar. 2010. Effects of hydrogen peroxide on the germination and early seedling growth of barley under NaCl and high termperature stresses. Eur. Asia J. Biosci. 4:70-79.
4
Chen, K., R. Arora, and U. Arora. 2010. Osmopriming of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L. cv. Bloomsdale) seeds and germination performance under temperature and water stress. Seed Sci. Technol. 38:45-57.
5
Duval, J.R. and D.S. NeSmit. 1998. Germination response of ‘Genesis’ triploid watermelon [Citrullus lanatus (Thunb.) Matsum. & Nakai] to hydrogen peroxide and seed coat alteration. HortScience 33:545-546.
6
Duval, J.R. and D.S. NeSmit. 2000. Treatment with hydrogen peroxide and seedcoat removal or clipping improve germination of ‘Genesis’ triploid watermelon. HortScience.35:85-86.
7
Egel, D.S.1999. Seed germination and health for triploid (Seedless) watermelons. BP‐62.
8
Eskandari, H. and K. Kazemi. 2011. Effect of seed priming on germination properties and seedling establishment of cowpea (Vigna sinensis). Not. Sci. Biol. 3:113-116.
9
Eskandari, H. 2013. Effects of priming technique on seed germination properties, emergence and field performance of crops. A review. Intl. J. Agron. Plant Prod. 4:454-458.
10
Esmaelli, M.A. and A. Heidarzade. 2012. Investigation of different osmopriming techniques on seed and seedling properties of rice (Oryza sativa) genotypes. IRJABS 3: 242-246.
11
Farooq, M., S.M.A. Basra, H. Rehman, N. Ahmad, and B.A. Saleem. 2007. Osmopriming improves the germination and early seedling growth of melons (cucumis meloL.). Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 44:529-536.
12
Farooq, M., S.M.A. Basra, B.A. Saleem, M. Nafees, and S.A. Chishti. 2005. Enhancement of tomato seed germination and seedling vigor by osmopriming. Pak. J. A. Sci. 42:36-41.
13
Ghodrat, V. and M.J. Rousta. 2012. Effect of priming with gibberellic acid (GA3) on germination and growth of corn (Zea mays L.) under saline conditions. IJACS 4:882-885.
14
Grange, S.L., D.I. Leskovar, L.M. Pike, and B.G. Cobb. 2000. Excess moisture and seedcoat nicking influence germination of triploid watermelon. HortScience 35:1355-1356.
15
Grange, S.L., D.I. Leskovar, L.M. Pike, and B.G. Cobb. 2003. Seedcoat structure and oxygen enhanced environments affect germination of triploid watermelon. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 128:253-259.
16
Gul, B. and D.J. Weber. 1998. Effect of dormancy relieving compounds on the seed germination of non-dormant Allenrolfea occidentalis under salinity stress. Ann. Bot. 82:555-560.
17
Harrington, J.F. and P.A. Minges. 1954. Vegetable seed germi-nation. Univ. Calif. Agric. Ext. Serv. (Mimeo).
18
Huang, R., S. Sukprakarn, T. Thongket, and S. Juntakool. 2002. Effect of hydropriming and redrying on the germination of triploid watermelon seeds. Kasetsart J. (Nat. Sci.) 36:219-224.
19
Kihara, H. 1951. Triploid watermelons. Proc. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci. 58:217-230.
20
Liu, P., W. Liu, S. Zhao, Z. Yan, N. He, and X. LU. 2010. Comparison of seed coat structure between different ploidy watermelons. J. Changjiang Vegetables. DOI CNKL:SON: CJSC.0.2010-08-009.
21
Lutsenko, E.K., E.A. Marushko, N.V. Kononenko, and T.G. Leonova. 2005. Effect of fusicoccin on the early stages of sorghum growth at high NaCl concentration. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 30:273-288.
22
Marr, C.V. and K.L.B. Gast. 1991. Reactions by consumers in a ‘farmers’market to prices for seedless watermelon and ratings of eating quality. HortTechnology 1:105-106.
23
Marre, E. 1979. Fusicoccin: a tool in plant physiology. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. 30:273-288.
24
Maynard, D.N. and G.W. Elmstrom. 1992. Triploid watermelon production practices and varieties. Acta Hortic. 318:169-173.
25
Mereddy, R., L. Wu, S.W. Hallgren, Y. Wu, and K.E. Conway. 2000. Solid matrix priming improves seedling vigor of Okra seeds. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 80:33-37.
26
Moeinzadeh, A., F. Sharif-Zadeh, M. Ahmadzadeh, and F.H. Tajabadi. 2010. Biopriming of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seed with Pseudomonas fluorescens for improvement of seed invigoration and seedling growth. AJCS 4:564-570.
27
Moghanibashi, M., H. Karimmojeni, P. Nikneshan, and D. Behrozi. 2012. Effect of hydropriming on seed germination indices of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under salt and draught conditions. PKJ 1:10-15.
28
Nerson, H., H.S. Paris, Z. Karchi, and M. Sachs. 1985. Seed treatments for improved germination of tetraploid watermelon. HortScience 15: 253-254.
29
Rezaei, R. and M. Ramezani. 2012. The physiological effects on some traits of osmopriming germination of maize (Zea mays L.), rice (Oryza sativa L.) and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.). IJB 4:132-148.
30
Rouhi, H.R., M.A. Aboutalebian, and F. Sharif-Zadeh. 2011. Effects of hydro and osmopriming on drought stress tolerance during germination in four grass species. Int. J. AgriScience 1:107-114.
31
Selvarani, K. and K. Umarani. 2011. Evaluation of seed priming methods to improve seed vigour of onion (Allium cepacv. aggregatum) and carrot (Daucus carota). J. Agric. Technol. 7: 857-867.
32
Shehzad, M., M. Ayub, A.U.H. Ahmad, and M. Yaseen. 2012. Influence of priming techniques on emergence and seedling growth of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). J. Anim. Plant Sci. 22:154-158.
33
Siadat, S.A., S.A. Moosavi, M.S. Zadeh, F. Fotouhi, and M. Zirezadeh. 2011. Effects of halo and phytohormone seed priming on germination and seedling growth of maize under different duration of accelerated ageing treatment. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6:6453-6462.
34
Simonovic, A., D. Grubisic, Z. Giba, And R. Konjevic. 2000. Interaction of gibberellics and fusicoccin in growth retardant and far red light inhibited germination in lettuce seeds. Plant Growth Regul. 32:91-97.
35
Tajima, N., M. Nukina, N. Kato, and T. Sasso. 2004. Novel fusicoccin R and S and the fusicoccin S Aglycon (phomosiol) from Phomopsis amygdali Niigata 2-A, and their seed germination stimulating activity in the presence of absisic acid. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 68:1125-1130.
36
Tzortzakis, N.G. 2009. Effect of pre-sowing treatment on seed germination and seedling vigour in endive and chicory. HortScience 36:117-125.
37
Whitaker, T.W. and G.N. Davis. 1962. Cucurbits. Interscience publisher. Inc., New York.
38
Yang, M.L. and F.J.M. Sung. 1994. The effect of suboptional temperature on germination of triploid watermelon seeds of different weights. Seed Sci. Technol. 22:485-493.
39
Yari, L., A. Zareyan, S. Sheidaie, and F. Khazaei. 2012. Influence of high and low temperature treatments on seed germination and seedling vigor of rice (Oryza sativa L.). WASJ 16:1015-1018.
40
Zhang, X. 2004. Inbred tetraploid watermelon line 90-4194.United States Patent Application Number 2004/0172690 A1.
페이지 상단으로 이동하기