Introduction

A closed-type plant production system, called an indoor plant production system, can efficiently produce vegetables, medicinal plants, and young seedlings throughout the year. In addition, the yield and nutritional quality of crops can be improved by adjusting the cultivation conditions (Liu et al., 2018). Light is one of the most essential environmental factors that affects plant growth and development (Zhang et al., 2015). Thus, selection of an optimal light source is an essential task in closed-type plant production systems.

Apart from light intensity, light quality or the light spectrum is also important for plant growth and development. Red and blue wavelengths of light have the greatest impact on photosynthetic biosynthesis and photomorphogenesis because chlorophyll a and b in leaf cells effectively absorb both red and blue light for photosynthesis (Sandquist and Ehleringer, 2015); in addition, photoreceptors such as phytochromes, phytotropins, and cryptochromes absorb both red and blue light for photomorphogenesis (Taiz et al., 2015). The red and blue lights have different effects on plant growth. For instance, red light is effective in promoting plant biomass (Johkan et al., 2010), and blue light is important for chlorophyll biosynthesis (Wang et al., 2009) and stomatal opening (Savvides et al., 2012). In addition, specific wavelengths influence plant metabolic composition such as ascorbic acid and flavonoid antioxidants (Bach et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2015). Combined red and blue lights were shown to be more effective than monochromatic red or blue light in increasing biomass (Shin et al., 2008). However, the effect of light quality is complex; while red light enhances biomass in many plants compared to blue light, some plants show opposite results (Son et al., 2013; Zheng and Labeke, 2018). Therefore, individual evaluation of each plant species or cultivars is a key imperative.

Physiological disorder is one of the main problems that affects product quality in closed-type plant production systems. Intumescence injury, also referred to as edema, oedema, neoplasms, enations, genetic tumors, and galls, has been observed in many plant species, such as white poplar (Populus grandidentatal) (D and Rue, 1933), tomato (Solanum lycopersicum and Lycopersicon hirsutum) (Lang and Tibbitts, 1983), sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) (Craver et al., 2014), and potato (Solanum tuberosum) (Douglas, 1907). This nonpathogenic injury is visually characterized by abnormal blister- or callus-like tumor growth (Eguchi et al., 2016). In tomato plants cultivated in closed-type plant production systems, intumescence injury mainly develops on the surface of leaves and sometimes on the petioles and the stems (Eguchi et al., 2016).

Previous studies indicated that light quality plays a key role in intumescence. It is widely known that ultraviolet (UV) radiation, especially UV-B radiation (280 - 320 nm), inhibits the development of intumescence (Lang and Tibbitts, 1983; Craver et al., 2014; Eguchi et al., 2016; Kubota et al., 2017). In addition to UV-B, far-red (Fr), blue (B), and green (G) light also have a preventive effect against intumescence (Wollaeger and Runkle, 2015; Eguchi et al., 2016). For example, in a study by Morrow and Tibbitts (1988), 0% and 3% of tomato leaf discs developed intumescence under B and G light treatment, respectively, while the corresponding figure was as high as 63% under red light treatment; in addition, Fr light mitigated intumescence with an increase in the irradiation level. However, the cause of intumescence and its underlying mechanisms are poorly understood.

Water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica Forsk) is an aquatic plant with worldwide distribution, including in Africa, Asia, and the Southwest Pacific islands (Austin, 2007), where it is one of the most popular green, leafy vegetables (Prasad et al., 2008). The plant exhibits vigorous growth; the maximum reported growth rate is approximately 10 cm per day and its shoot may exceed 21 m in length (Mccann et al., 1996). In addition, its leaves and stems are rich sources of minerals, proteins, vitamins, and fiber (Wills and Rangga, 1996; Umar et al., 2007). Thus, water spinach can be a suitable candidate vegetable for indoor food production. However, some indoor cultivation companies are encountering an intumescence problem that reduces the plant’s marketable value. The issue appears often, especially with LED systems, which is a future trend for indoor plant production. The basic knowledge pertaining to production of water spinach in indoor plant production systems and the effects of LED quality on physiological disorder of water spinach are largely lacking. In this study, we aim to clarify the appropriate light quality for production of water spinach in an artificial environment.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Water spinach seeds (Matol Seeds, Bangkok, Thailand) were soaked in 30°C water for 16 hours and then wrapped in wet paper at 27°C air temperature until the appearance of roots. Rooted seeds were sown in urethane sponge cubes (14.78 cm³) in a cultivation room and kept in a dark condition for the first 24 hours. Subsequently, light was provided for 16 hours per day using cool white fluorescent lamps (FHF32 EX-W-J; Hitachi Appliances, Tokyo, Japan). Photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) at the surface of the cultivation panel was set at 150 µmol·m^-2·s^-1. Seedlings were cultivated hydroponically using nutrient solution (NO₃-N 12.0 me·L^-1, PO₄-P 4.0 me·L^-1, SO₄-S 2.0 me·L^-1, NH₄-N 1.3 me·L^-1, K 4.0 me·L^-1, Ca 4.3 me·L^-1, Mg 2.0 me·L^-1, Fe 2.85 mg·L^-1, B 0.32 mg·L^-1, Mn 0.02 mg·L^-1, Zn 0.04 mg·L^-1, Cu 0.02 mg·L^-1, and Mo 0.02 mg·L^-1) with an EC of 1.0 dS·m^-1 and pH of 6.8 ± 0.2. Air temperature and relative humidity were 24 ± 2/20 ± 1°C (light/dark period) and 21 - 74%, respectively.

Twelve days after sowing, seedlings were planted on polystyrene raft panels (30 cm × 60 cm) and transplanted into a DFT system (120 cm × 60 cm × 3 racks) in a walk-in-type plant factory (2.9 m × 2.0 m × 3.0 m in LWH). Water depth was maintained at 3 cm and circulated by a pump (MD-30R; Iwaki Co, Tokyo, Japan). One panel contained 26 plants, each spaced 8.4 cm apart (effective planting density of 144 plants per m²). The EC of the nutrient solution was set at 2.0 dS·m^-1 and adjusted every minute by an Easy-Treatment-Fertilizer-Controller 2 (CEM Corporation Co., Tokyo, Japan). Throughout the experiment, air temperature, relative humidity, and CO₂ concentration in the plant factory were maintained at 24 ± 2/19 ± 1°C (light/dark period), 42 - 81%, and 1,500 µmol·mol^-1, respectively.

Treatments

Five different spectra of LEDs were used (Fig. 1): 1, red (R); 2, blue (B); 3, green (G) (LED Small lighting Unit for Plant Research, ISLM-150 × 150-RR· -BB· -GG; CCS Inc., Kyoto, Japan); 4, red and blue (RB) (red:blue = 87:13 photon flux density); and 5, red and blue with far red (RBFr) (red:blue:far red = 81.5:12.5:6 photon flux density) (GreenPower LED production module, DR/B· DR/B/FR; Philips Japan, Tokyo, Japan). RB was used as the control. Light intensity of all treatments was set at a PPFD of 200 ± 15 µmol·m^-2·s^-1 with a photoperiod of 14 hours per day for 14 days after transplantation. The PPFD was measured in six locations of the cultivation panel surface using a quantum sensor (LI 250A, LI-190R; Li-Cor Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The light spectra were measured by a spectroradiometer (Lighting Passport, AsenseTek, Taiwan) over wavelengths ranging from 380 to 780 nm.

Fig. 1. Relative spectral distributions of each LED lights. R = red; B = blue; G = green; RB = red + blue (R:B = 87:13); RBFr = red + blue with far red (R:B:Fr = 81.5:12.5:6). Average PPFD was 200 µmol·m^-2·s^-1 for all treatments.

Measurement of Growth Parameters and Intumescence Number on Stems

Water spinach was harvested at 26 days after sowing. Stem and leaf fresh weights (FW) and shoot length were determined immediately after harvesting. Then, the total leaf area per plant was determined using a leaf area meter (Li-3000; Li-Cor, Inc., Lincoln, NE, USA). The leaf and stem samples were placed in an oven at 80°C for 4 days to determine dry weight (DW). The leaf and stem relative water content (WC) was calculated using the following formula: WC = [(FW - DW)/FW] × 100. Total nitrogen (N) and total carbon (C) content in the leaf were determined using dried leaf samples and a CNS analyzer (Elementar Vario Max CNS; Elementar Japan K.K., Kanagawa, Japan). The number of intumescences on the stem was counted from the center of the first internode (1 cm²). The anatomical analysis was performed based on the method described by Hajiboland et al. (2012), with slight modifications. The stem sample of the first internode was cut horizontally by a razor. The samples were washed with distilled water and placed in 5% sodium hypochlorite solution for 30 min for clearing and rinsed with distilled water. Following washing in 10% acetic acid for 5 min to remove sodium hypochlorite, the sections were stained with iodine green and carmine for lignin and cellulose, respectively, for 5 min and then rinsed with distilled water. Anatomical characteristics were observed under a microscope (Motic BA310; SHIMADZU RIKA Co., Tokyo, Japan).

Determination of Pigment Concentrations

The chlorophyll (Chl) a and b, total Chl, and total carotenoid concentrations were measured in the tip of fully opened leaf tissues by immersion in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). Two leaf discs with a total area of 1 cm² were placed into glass vials containing 5 mL of DMF and immediately placed in the dark at 4°C for 36 hours. The absorbance of the solution was then read on a spectrophotometer at 663.8, 646.8, and 480 nm, using DMF as a blank. The pigment concentrations were calculated according to the following equations (Wellburn, 1994).

Chl_a (µg·mL^-1) = 12A_663.8 ‑ 3.11A_646.8

Chl_b (µg·mL^-1) = 20.78A_646.8 ‑ 4.88A_663.8

Total Chl (µg·mL^-1) = 17.67A_646.8 + 7.12A_663.8

Total carotenoid (µg·mL^-1) = (1,000A_480.0 ‑ 1.12Chl_a ‑ 34.07Chl_b)/245

DPPH Radical-Scavenging Activity

The scavenging activity of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrydrazyl (DPPH) radicals was determined using spectrophotometric analysis based on a slightly modified version of the method described by Prior et al. (2005) and Gonçalves et al. (2013). The stem and the leaves of each plant were sampled separately for measurement. One gram of frozen samples was homogenized with 5 mL of 95% ethanol (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) for 1 min. The extract was centrifuged at 4°C and 10,000 × g for 30 min. The supernatant was diluted with ethanol to 6 mL and stored at - 30°C until further analysis. Solution (0.1 mL) was added to 2 mL of 30 µM DPPH radical solutions (Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan) in ethanol and rapidly mixed. Absorbance at 517 nm was determined after incubation in the dark at room temperature for 30 min. DPPH radical-scavenging activity was determined from the liner equation of a standard curve obtained with different concentrations of Trolox (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan), and ethanol was taken as a blank. The linear equation of a standard curve was 0.999, and the results were expressed as milligrams Trolox equivalent (TE) per gram FW (mg TE/g FW).

Measurement of Ascorbic Acid Content

Ascorbic acid content was measured as described by Tabata et al. (2001) with slight modification using a reflectometer (RQflex plus; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and analysis strips (Ascorbic Acid Test; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany). Twenty-six days after sowing, the stem and the leaves of each plant were separated and stored in polyethylene bags at - 30°C until further processing. One gram of frozen sample was homogenized with 4 or 2 mL of 5% metaphoric acid (w/v) (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). Then, the filtered liquid solution was measured.

Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content was determined using Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Tokyo, Japan) using a slightly modified version of the method described by Prior et al. (2005) and Bantis et al. (2016). The stem extract and the leaf extract were prepared as described in the DPPH radical-scavenging activity method. The plant extract (0.25 mL) was mixed with 1.25 mL of 10% Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (v/v) and was neutralized with 1 mL of 7.5% (w/v) sodium carbonate solution (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan). The reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. The absorbance of the resulting blue color was measured at 765 nm using a spectrophotometer (ASV11D; AS ONE Co., Osaka, Japan). The total phenolic content was determined from the linear equation of a standard curve prepared with different concentrations of gallic acid (correlation coefficient: R² = 0.998) and expressed as milligrams gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per gram FW (mg GAE/g FW).

Statistical Analysis

Twenty-three plants were sampled for each treatment. Fifteen plants were used to evaluate growth parameters (stem length, stem FW, stem DW, stem WC, leaf number, leaf FW, leaf DW, leaf WC, and leaf area), of which eight plants were used for counting the number of intumescent lesions, and total C and total N content. Eight plants were used to determine chlorophyll content and secondary metabolic parameters. The data were subjected to analysis of variance, and mean values were compared between different treatment groups using Tukey’s test; p < 0.05 was considered indicative of significant between-group difference. Correlation between number of intumescent lesions and shoot length, between the number of intumescent lesions and the total N content in shoot, between secondary metabolite parameters in stem (antioxidant capacity and ascorbic acid content) and stem WC, and between secondary metabolite parameters in stem (antioxidant capacity and ascorbic acid content) and stem DW were evaluated with Pearson’s correlation coefficient. SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 25.0; IBM Co., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Growth Parameters

Light quality significantly affected the growth of water spinach. Data pertaining to stem length, stem FW and DW, leaf number, leaf FW and DW, leaf area, and shoot FW in different treatment groups are presented in Table 1. Stem length increased significantly under R light treatment. Compared with RB light treatment, stem length increased by 61.55% and 43.82% under R and G light treatment, respectively. A similar trend was observed with respect to stem FW, DW, and WC. In contrast to stem parameters, leaf number, leaf FW, leaf DW, leaf WC, and leaf area under R and G light treatment were lower than those under RB, RBFr, and B light treatment. The highest shoot FW was observed under RBFr light treatment, followed by RB, R, and G light treatment; the lowest shoot FW was observed under B light treatment. Total N and total C content (mg·g^-1 DW) in the shoot under B light treatment was significantly greater than that observed under RB light treatment, while that observed under G and R light treatment was lower than that observed under RB light treatment (Fig. 2).

Table 1. Growth parameters of water spinach grown under red (R), blue (B), green (G), red and blue (RB), and red and blue with far-red (RBFr) light at 14 days after treatment (n = 15)

zR = red; B = blue; G = green; RB = red + blue (R:B = 87:13); RBFr = red + blue with far red (R:B:Fr = 81.5:12.5:6). yDifferent letters in each column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test). xFresh weight. wDry weight. vRelative water content. uStem + leaf.

Fig. 2. Total nitrogen (N) and total carbon (C) content in shoot (stem and leaf) of water spinach grown under red (R), blue (B), green (G), red and blue (RB), and red and blue with far red (RBFr) light at 14 days after treatment (n = 8). Data are presented as mean ± SE with vertical error bar. Different letters in each column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test).

Intumescence on the Stem

We observed intumescence on the epidermis of the stem, whereas no symptoms were observed on the petioles or leaves. The symptoms were most severe in the first internode above the cotyledons and were affected by light quality, especially B light (Fig. 3A). Hyperplasia of epidermal cells was observed in the intumescent stems (Fig. 3B). Compared to RB light treatment, the number of intumescent lesions increased by 50.25% and 27.66% under B and RBFr light treatment, respectively (Fig. 3C); in contrast, that in R and G light treatment significantly decreased by 95.80% and 72.34%, respectively. A strong negative correlation was observed between the number of intumescent lesions and the shoot length (r = - 0.88: p < 0.01) (Fig. 3D); however, there was no significant correlation between the number of intumescent lesions and the total N content in shoot (r = 0.67).

Fig. 3. Intumescent lesions on stem of water spinach grown under red (R), blue (B), green (G), red and blue (RB), and red and blue with far red (RBFr) light at 14 days after treatment. (A), Intumescence injury on stems under five different light treatments. (B), An intumescence (arrow) and cellular organization after staining with toluidine blue: vascular cores (Vc), epidermis (Ep), and pith cavity (Pc). (C), Number of intumescent lesions. Data are presented as mean ± SE with vertical error bar (n = 8). Different letters in each column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test). (D), Correlation between number of intumescence lesions and shoot length (n = 30, r = - 0.88: p < 0.01).

Pigment Concentration

The concentrations of Chl a, b, total Chl, Chl a to b ratio (Chl a/b), and total carotenoids are presented in Table 2. Water spinach grown under B and G light showed lower content of Chl a, Chl b, total Chl, and total carotenoids compared to that under RB light treatment. Chl a/b was significantly higher under B light treatment and significantly lower under G light treatment compared to that under RB light treatment.

Table 2. Chlorophyll (Chl) and total carotenoid content of water spinach grown under red (R), blue (B), green (G), red and blue (RB), and red and blue with far red (RBFr) light at 14 days after treatment (n = 8)

zR = red; B = blue; G = green; RB = red + blue (R:B = 87:13); RBFr = red + blue with far red (R:B:Fr = 81.5:12.5:6). yDifferent letters in each column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test).

Secondary Metabolites

The antioxidant capacity, ascorbic acid content, and total phenolic content in different treatment groups are shown in Fig. 4. Antioxidant capacity in leaf and stem showed a similar trend with the highest antioxidant capacity in both leaf and stem achieved under B light treatment. Compared to RB treatment, the antioxidant capacity in leaf and stem under B light treatment increased by 210.0% and 122.2%, respectively. No significant difference was observed between RB treatment and other treatments with respect to ascorbic acid and total phenolic content in leaves, although ascorbic acid content was significantly lower than that under R light treatment. In the stem, ascorbic acid and total phenolic contents under B light treatment were significantly higher than those of other treatments. Compared to RB treatment, ascorbic acid and total phenolic content in stems under B light treatment increased by 56.23% and 48.97%, respectively. A strong negative correlation was observed between secondary metabolite parameters for stem (antioxidant capacity, ascorbic acid content) and stem WC (r = - 0.98 and - 0.97, respectively; p < 0.01) (Fig. 5A, B) and that between secondary metabolite parameters and stem FW (r = - 0.97 and - 0.94, respectively; p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively) (Fig. 5C, D).

Fig. 4. Secondary metabolite content in stem and leaf of water spinach grown under red (R), blue (B), green (G), red and blue (RB), and red and blue with far red (RBFr) light at 14 days after treatment. (A), Antioxidant capacity; (B), ascorbic acid content; (C), total phenolic content. Data are presented as mean ± SE with vertical error bar (n = 8). Different letters in each column indicate significant difference (p < 0.05, Tukey’s test).

Fig. 5. Correlations between stem relative water content (WC) and antioxidant capacity in stems (A), stem WC and ascorbic acid content in stems (B), stem fresh weight (FW) and antioxidant capacity in stems (C), as well as stem FW and ascorbic acid content in stems (D) of water spinach grown under red (R), blue (B), green (G), red and blue (RB), and red and blue with far red (RBFr) light at 14 days after treatment. Error bars represent ± SE.

Discussion

In this study, plant growth was significantly influenced by light quality. Stem FW significantly increased under R light treatment, and this phenomenon was largely attributable to stem elongation (Table 1). A positive effect of red light on stem elongation has been reported in some plant species, such as tobacco, pepper, and chrysanthemum (Schuerger et al., 1997; Kim et al., 2004; Yang et al., 2017). In contrast, leaf FW was greatest under RBFr light treatment, and this was probably due to the larger leaf area (Table 1). The shoot FW was greatest under RBFr light treatment, followed by that under RB, R, G, and B light treatment (in that order). Fr radiation itself has a low quantum yield because of insufficient excitation of photosystem II (PS II) with overexcitation of photosystem I (PS I) (Emerson and Lewis, 1943; Duysens and Amesz, 1962). PS II preferentially absorbs wavelengths between 400 and 680 nm and maximally at around 680 nm and PS I absorbs maximally at around 720 nm (Duysens and Amesz, 1962; Franck et al., 2002; Hogewoning et al., 2012; Park and Runkle, 2017). Therefore, higher shoot FW under RBFr treatment in this study is likely attributable to a suitable balance for excitation of the two photosystems, as suggested by Allen (2003).

Intumescence injury, visually characterized by blister- or callus-like tumors especially on the leaf surface, is an abiotic-stress-induced physiological disorder (Kubota et al., 2017). In our study, we observed nonpathogenic tumorous growth on the epidermis of the stem (Fig. 3A, B). B light increased the number of intumescent lesions (Fig. 3C) and the number of intumescent lesions showed a strong correlation with stem elongation (Fig. 3D). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of intumescence injury on stems of water spinach. In previous studies, monochromatic R light was shown to promote intumescence injury in tomato plants (Morrow and Tibbitts, 1988; Wollaeger and Runkle, 2015). In contrast, some reports indicated that Fr light deficit is one of the causes of intumescence injury in tomato plants (Morrow and Tibbitts, 1988; Eguchi et al., 2016). Morrow and Tibbitts (1988) pointed out that inhibition of neoplasms by Fr light indicates that phytochrome is a primary regulator of this response. However, the results observed in water spinach are not consistent with those reported for tomatoes. B light aggravated the intumescence injury, and it seemed that this physiological disorder is possibly related to the inhibition of stem elongation. Although the exact mechanism by which B light induces physiological disorder is not understood, it is clear that monochromatic B light plays a role in the development of intumescence injury and shortening of the stem of water spinach.

In addition, it is known that an excess amount of N may cause abnormal stem in tomato plants. Crease-stem (abnormality) is one of the physiological disorders observed in tomato plants; this condition leads to thicker stems, shorter internodes, and slits (Abe et al., 1964; Grimbly, 1986). In our study, B light treatment resulted in greater total N content (mg·g^-1 DW) in shoots compared to monochromatic R light (Fig. 2). However, there was no significant correlation between total N content in shoots and the number of intumescent lesions.

Chl content is an important factor not only for photosynthesis but also the color of leafy vegetables. In our study, we observed that plants under B light showed lower content of Chl a, Chl b, total Chl, and total carotenoid, compared with R light treatment (Table 2). These results indicate that R light may have promoted the accumulation of Chl and total carotenoid content in water spinach. Similar effects have been reported in cucumber (Wang et al., 2009), tobacco (Yang et al., 2017), and lettuce (Johkan et al., 2010; Heo et al., 2012). On the other hand, an increase in Chl a/b was recorded under B light treatment. Although the underlying mechanisms are not well known, a similar phenomenon was also found in other studies (Johkan et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2013).

Production of valuable and functional vegetables (e.g., high phytochemical and vitamin content) is one of the main tasks in closed-type plant production systems. Many studies have shown that phytochemical accumulation in vegetables is significantly affected by light quality. Johkan et al. (2010) and Son and Oh (2013, 2015) reported that additional B light exposure in combination with R light increased the antioxidant capacity compared to monochromatic R or B light in lettuce. In this study, monochromatic B light significantly increased the antioxidant capacity in water spinach leaves (Fig. 4A) but did not significantly increase contents of ascorbic acid, total phenolics, and total carotenoids in leaves, compared to R light treatments (Fig. 4B, C and Table 2). However, ascorbic acid and phenolics are vital antioxidant compounds in plants (Bian et al., 2015; Bantis et al., 2016). This result indicates that the ascorbic acid, total phenolics, and total carotenoid content did not contribute to the high antioxidant capacity in leaves under B light treatment. In stems, B light increased the antioxidant capacity, ascorbic acid, and total phenolic contents compared to other treatments. This phenomenon is likely attributable to a reduction in stem growth (Table 1); indeed, we observed a negative correlation between antioxidant capacity in stems and stem FW, and between total ascorbic acid content in stems and stem FW (Fig. 5C, D). On the other hand, B light treatment significantly decreased ascorbic acid content in leaves but increased ascorbic acid content in stems compared to R light. This result indicated that ascorbic acid content in leaves was not affected by light quality but rather water content in leaves (Table 1).

In conclusion, our results show that R light has a positive effect on growth of water spinach. Monochromatic B light increased the antioxidant activity capacity. B light stimulated intumescent lesions in stems and reduced stem elongation, although monochromatic R light played a significant role in the prevention of intumescence development and a positive role in stem elongation. This suggests that use of monochromatic R light may be an option for controlling intumescence of water spinach plants grown in closed-type plant production systems. In addition, there is a possibility that inhibition of stem elongation may cause intumescence in stem. To our knowledge, this is the first report on the effects of light quality on intumescence development in water spinach. Our results suggest that monochromatic R light promotes water spinach growth without intumescence.