Horticultural Science and Technology. 31 December 2017. 784-792
https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20170082

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •    Plant Samples

  •    Chromosome Spread Preparation

  •    Probe Preparation

  •    Fluorescence in situ Hybridization

  • Results and Discussion

Introduction

Platycodon grandiflorum (Jacq.) A. DC., which is commonly known as bell flower or balloon flower, is an herbaceous perennial plant in the monotypic genus Platycodon in the Campanulaceae family (Jang et al., 2013). This species is native to China, Japan, Korea, and East Siberia (Wu et al., 2012). In addition to its ornamental flowers, P. grandiflorum is used as a traditional medicine to treat bronchitis, asthma,hyperlipidemia, hypertension, diabetes, and atopic dermatitis (Lee et al., 2008; Jeong et al., 2010; Urbańska et al., 2014). Recent studies have shown that its roots are a valuable source of saponins such as platycodins and spinasterol (Choi et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2015). These bioactive compounds are responsible for its many health benefits, including its anti-inflammatory, anticarcinogenic, immune-enhancing, hepatoprotective, and spermicidal effects (Lee et al., 2001; Lu et al., 2013; Qin et al., 2014). Several P. grandiflorum cultivars have been developed (Park et al., 2005; Shi et al., 2011; Um et al., 2016). In a recent study, molecular markers using SNPs were developed to explore its genetic diversity (Kim et al., 2015). Nevertheless, P. grandiflorum is still considered to be an orphan crop because genetic studies of this plant have been limited. In addition, very little cytogenetic information is available to support genetic and genomic studies of this plant (Wu et al., 2012; Kim et al., 2015).

Molecular cytogenetics via fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) plays an important role in clarifying plant genome structures, thus supporting genome-sequencing research (Macas et al., 2007; Michael and Jackson, 2013; Choi et al., 2014). Such studies can provide chromosome counts, identify the physical locations of repeat elements and genes, and reveal genome rearrangements, such as chromosomal segment inversions and translocations (Khrustaleva and Kik, 2001; Devi et al., 2005; Kato et al., 2006; Macas et al., 2007; Huang et al., 2009; Sybenga, 2012).

Tandem repeats [e.g. ribosomal DNA (rDNA), centromeric and telomeric repeats] are valuable cytogenetic markers that provide information about genome organization and allow for the identification of homologous chromosome pairs (Heslop- Harrison 2000; Tigano et al., 2004). Both 5S and 45S rDNAs have highly conserved coding regions, as they are essential for ribosome function (Harrison and Heslop-Harrison, 1995; Buckler et al., 1997; Cabral et al., 2006). Additionally, inter-genera and inter-specific differences exist in terms of rDNA loci number and distribution (Castilho and Heslop-Harrison, 1995; Li and Arumuganathan, 2001), a characteristic that has been exploited to identify individuals at the species level or even at the subspecies or variety level (Hasterok et al., 2006). Telomeric repeats, which are usually found on chromosome ends, have also proven to be an effective molecular marker for mapping telomere locations across a wide range of species (Cox et al., 1993).

The basic chromosome number in Campanulaceae was reported to be x = 7, 8, or 9 (Sugiura, 1942; Raven, 1975; Hong, 1994; Zhang et al., 2011). Karyotype data have been reported for a diploid (2n = 2x = 18) and an induced tetraploid (2n = 4x = 36) line of P. grandiflorum (Linchu, 1986; Wu et al., 2012; Ma et al., 2015). The use of only conventional karyotyping techniques and the lack of sophisticated cytogenetic markers have resulted in the reporting of different karyotype formulae for P. grandiflorum (Wang et al., 2005; Yang et al., 2015). On the other hand, FISH-based karyotype analysis enables the identification of cytotypes, such as those from the same Brassica rapa species (Xiong and Pires, 2011). Thus, FISH-based karyotype analysis between several P. grandiflorum cultivars would provide chromosome-level polymorphism information.

In this study, we performed FISH karyotype analyses using 5S and 45S rDNAs and telomeric repeat probes in seven cultivars of P. grandiflorum. Our results provide a foundation for future cytogenetic mapping of major repeat elements, as well as for integrating genetic maps to elucidate genome structure and dynamics in P. grandiflorum.

Materials and Methods

Plant Samples

Seven P. grandiflorum cultivars, including ‘Astra Semi-Double Blue’, ‘Astra White’, ‘Fuji Blue’, ‘Fuji Pink’, ‘Fuji White’, ‘Hakone Double Blue’ and change to: ‘Maries II’, which were obtained from Swallowtail Garden Seeds (Santa Rosa, CA, USA),were kindly provided by the Department of Herbal Crop Research, National Institute of Horticultural and Herbal Science, RDA, Eumseong, Republic of Korea and used for karyotype analysis

Chromosome Spread Preparation

Briefly, root tips treated with 2 mM 8-hydroxyquinoline and fixed in Carnoy’s solution were enzymatically digested with pectolytic enzyme solution [2% Cellulase R-10 (C224, Phytotechnology Laboratories) and 1% Pectolyase Y-23 (P8004.0001, Duchefa) in 100 mM citrate buffer] for 1 h. The root tips were transferred into a microtube containing aceto-ethanol (1:3, v/v) solution and vortexed for 30 seconds. The supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was resuspended in (9:1 v/v) aceto-ethanol and spread onto slides that had been pre-cleaned with 70% ethanol and pre-warmed in a humid chamber (Waminal et al., 2011). Air-dried slides were fixed in 2% formaldehyde (Vranaet al., 2012) for 5 min and dehydrated in a graded ethanol series (70%, 90%, and 100%).

Probe Preparation

The PCR product from 18S rDNA amplification (Matoba et al., 2007) was labeled with DEAC-5-dUTP via nick translation. The 5S rDNA from Brassica oleracea was PCR-amplified (Koo et al., 2002) and labeled with Alexa Fluor® 488-5-dUTP (C11397, Invitrogen) via nick translation. The Arabidopsis-type telomere sequence was PCR-amplified in the absence of the template using primers (TTTAGG)5 and (CCCTAAA)5 (Abd El-Twab and Kondo, 2006) and labeled with Texas Red-5-dUTP (NEL417001EA, Perkin Elmer).

Fluorescence in situ Hybridization

The hybridization mixture consisted of 100% formamide, 50% dextran sulfate, 20X SSC, 50 ng·μL-1 of each DNA probe, and Sigma purified water. The mixture was denatured at 90°C for 10 min, and 40 μL was pipetted onto each slide. The slides were incubated at 80°C for 5 min, followed by overnight incubation in a pre-warmed humid chamber at 37°C. The incubated slides were washed in 2 × SSC at room temperature (RT) for 10 min, 0.1 × SSC at 42°C for 25 min, and 2 × SSC at room temperature for 5 min, followed by dehydration in a graded ethanol series (70%, 90%, 95%) at room temperature. The slides were counterstained with Vectashield (Vector Labs, H-1000, USA) containing 1 μg·mL-11 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) and examined under an Olympus BX53 fluorescence microscope with a built-in CCD camera (CoolSNAP™ cf) using an oil lens (×100 magnification). The images were edited using Adobe Photoshop CS6. Chromosome types were classified according to Levan et al. (1964). The chromosomes were paired based on their FISH signals, morphological characteristics, and lengths.

Results and Discussion

We performed FISH karyotype analysis of seven P. grandiflorum cultivars using 5S rDNA, 45S rDNA and telomeric repeat probes. All cultivars examines had 2n = 2x = 18 chromosomes (Fig. 1), which is in agreement with previous karyotype reports (Suzuka and Koriba, 1949; Wu et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2015).

The chromosomes were arranged in decreasing length (Table 1), and homologous chromosomes were paired according to chromosomal features and FISH signals from the 5S and 45S rDNA and telomeric repeat probes. Linchu (1986) and Yang et al.(2015) reported that the karyotypic formula of P. grandiflorum is 2 n = 2 x = 18 = 12 m + 6 sm (2SAT) and 2 n = 2 x = 18 = 10 m + 8 sm (2SAT), respectively. Our results were a bit different from these, i.e. 2 n = 2 x = 18 = 14 m + 2 sm + 2 st (2SAT), a type 2A pattern according to the classification of Yang et al. (2015). These karyotypic differences might be due to the different chromosome condensation stages examined or the lack of more sophisticated centromere-specific probes, which could make it difficult to perform accurate measurement considering the small chromosome sizes (Liehr et al., 2004). The development of more sophisticated probes, such as centromere- or chromosome-specific probes, would greatly enhance karyotype analysis in the future.

Fig. 1.

FISH mitotic metaphase spreads from seven Platycodon grandiflorum (Jacq.) A. DC cultivars. Chromosome spread from ‘Astra Semi-Double Blue’ (A), ‘Astra Whites’ (B), ‘Fuji Blue’ (C), ‘Fuji Pink’ (D), ‘Fuji White’ (E), ‘Hakone Double Blue’ (F), and ‘Maries II’ (G) showing 5S (green) rDNA, 45S rDNA (yellow), and telomeric repeats (red). White arrows indicate the satellite chromosomes. Green arrows indicate co-localized 5S and 45S rDNA signals. Scale bar = 5 μm.

Table 1. Karyotype analyses of the seven cultivars of Platycodon grandiflorum (Jacq.) A. DC. http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2017-035-06/N0130350612/images/Table_KSHS_35_06_12_T1.jpg

m; metacentric, sm; submetacentric, st; subtelocentric, *; satellite chromosome.

Ribosomal DNA arrays, comprising long repeat units with highly conserved coding regions, are commonly used for chromosome characterization. These arrays are categorized into different families, including nucleolar organizing region (NOR)-forming 45S rDNA and non-NOR-forming 5S rDNA (Rogers and Bendich, 1987; Tigano et al., 2004). The locations of these two families usually vary across genera and species, which can be exploited in taxonomic and phylogenetic studies (Shi et al., 1993; Vaio et al., 2005). Telomeric repeats are also effective molecular markers for use at the species level (Cox et al., 1993), as they have conserved repeat sequences in plants (Levin, 2002).

In the present study, we detected rDNA signals on separate chromosomes in most cultivars. Signals from 5S rDNA were located at interstitial or pericentromeric regions of the chromosomes, while 45S rDNA signals were found on NORs (Figs.1 and 2). Independent localization of rDNA loci is more informative than co-localization of signals when identifying chromosomes (Krinski et al., 2012) and constructing a cytogenetic map, which are important for deducing species relationships (Maghuly et al., 2010). We found that in general, one 5S rDNA locus was localized on the interstitial region of the short arm of chromosome 3 (Fig. 2A–C, F, G), a common pattern in some plant species (Castilho and Heslop-Harrison, 1995). Exceptions were observed in ‘Fuji Pink’ and ‘Fuji White’, where 5S rDNA hybridized on the pericentromeric region of chromosome 3 (Fig. 2D, E). In all cultivars, 45S rDNA signals were present at the NOR of the satellite on chromosome 9. The NOR is a secondary constriction on satellite chromosomes containing 18S-5.8S-26S DNA that is used as a signal for chromosome identification (Mukai et al., 1991; Devi et al., 2005).

In ‘Astra’, 5S and 45S rDNA co-localized on the NOR of chromosome 9 (Fig. 2A, B). This pattern is not often observed, but it occurs in several plant species such as some cucurbits (Muravenko et al., 2004; Abd El-Twab and Kondo, 2012). The 5S rDNA signals on chromosome 3 and its augmentation on the NOR of chromosome 9 suggest the occurrence of sequence recombination (Rogers and Bendich, 1987; Scoles et al., 1988). The distribution of rDNA loci can vary between cultivars within a species (Ørgaard et al., 1995; Xiong and Pires, 2011). This difference in rDNA distribution also implies that genes in this species tend to undergo frequent rearrangements.

The Arabidopsis-type telomeric repeat (TTTAGGG) hybridized onto most terminal regions of the chromosomes in all seven cultivars, as occurs in most plant species (Fuchs et al., 1995). Complete and intense telomeric signals were observed in ‘Maries II’, while signals were weaker or absent in ‘Astra White’(chromosomes 1, 5, 6, and 7), ‘Fuji Pink’(chromosomes 5, 6, and 8), ‘Fuji White’(chromosomes 5 and 7), and ‘Hakone Double Blue’(chromosome 4) (Fig. 2B, D, E, F). These discrepancies are likely due to experimental variations in sequence length or deletions in telomeric repeats resulting from extensive rearrangements (Schubert et al., 1998). Differing degrees of chromosome condensation might be responsible for the co-localization of 5S rDNA and telomeric repeats on chromosome 3 in ‘Hakone Double Blue’ and ‘Maries II’ (Fig. 2F, G).

Fig. 2.

Karyogram of seven Platycodon grandiflorum cultivars. (A) ‘Astra Semi-Double Blue’, (B) ‘Astra White’, (C) ‘Fuji Blue’, (D) ‘Fuji Pink’, (E) ‘Fuji White’, (F) ‘Hakone Double Blue’, and (G) ‘Maries II’. 5S rDNA, 45S rDNA, and telomeric repeats appear as green, yellow and red signals, respectively. White arrows indicate satellite chromosomes with NOR regions, and green arrows indicate co-localization of 5S and 45S rDNA. Scale bar = 5 μm.

Um et al. (2016) classified P. grandiflorum cultivars based on morphological characterization and the use of molecular markers. Based on the genetic relationships deduced by examining SSR markers and morphological traits, the cultivars ‘Fuji’, ‘Hakone Double Blue’, and ‘Maries II’ belong to one group, whereas ‘Astra Semi Blue’ and ‘Astra White’ fall into separate, distinct groups. Based on our results, the 5S and 45S rDNA loci co-localized in the two ‘Astra’ cultivars but not in ‘Fuji- Blue, Pink, White’, ‘Hakone Double Blue’, or ‘Maries II’, corroborating the previous classification based on differences in morphological characteristics and the genetic relatedness of the cultivars (Um et al., 2016).

Repetitive sequences are frequently investigated and used to examine plant genome organization or to establish phylogenies (She et al., 2007). In particular, tandemly repeated DNA sequences are useful cytogenetic markers because such sequences account for a considerable proportion of the plant genome and are localized to specific chromosomal regions (Macas et al., 2011; Waminal et al., 2016). In this study, we performed FISH using the most commonly used 5S and 45S rDNA and telomeric cytogenetic markers. However, more cytogenetic markers, such as major or minor repeats and transposable elements, could be developed as more sequence information becomes available in the future. These markers would be useful for karyotyping and discriminating species or cultivars. Research aimed at refining our understanding of the genome constitution of P. grandiflorum should include additional cytogenetic studies to develop repeat-based probes based on genome-wide repeat analysis of nextgeneration sequencing data or through self-genomic in situ hybridization (self-GISH). A well-established karyotype serves as a backbone for integrating genetic linkage maps with genome sequence assemblies.

References

1
Anderberg, AA (1989) Phylogeny and reclassification of the tribe Inuleae (Asteraceae). Can J Bot 67:2277-2296. doi:10.1139/b89-292
2
Andrews S (2010) FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Retrieved from http://www.bioinformatics. bbsrc.ac.uk/projects/fastqc
3
Bayer RJ, Starr JR (1998) Tribal phylogeny of the Asteraceae based on two non-coding chloroplast sequences, the trn L intron and trn L/trnF intergenic spacer. Ann Mol Bot Gard 242–256. doi:10.2307/2992008
4
Bentley J, Klaassen ES, Bergh NG (2015) Philyrophyllum (Asteraceae) transferred from Gnaphalieae to Athroismeae based on phylogenetic analysis of nuclear and plastid DNA sequence data. Taxon 64:975-986. doi:10.12705/645.7
5
Bock DG, Kane NC, Ebert DP, Rieseberg LH (2014) Genome skimming reveals the origin of the Jerusalem artichoke tuber crop species: neither from Jerusalem nor an artichoke. New Phytol 201:1021-1030. doi:10.1111/nph.1256
6
Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B (2014) Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30:2114-2120. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170
7
Choi KS, Park SJ (2015) The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Aster spathulifolius (Asteraceae); genomic features and relationship with Asteraceae. Gene 572:214-221. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2015.07.020
8
Delannoy E, Fujii S, des Francs-Small CC, Brundrett M, Small I (2011) Rampant gene loss in the underground orchid Rhizanthella gardneri highlights evolutionary constraints on plastid genomes. Mol Biol Evol 28:2077-2086. doi:10.1093/molbev/msr028
9
Dempewolf H, Kane NC, Ostevik KL, Geleta M, Barker MS, Lai Z, Stewart ML, Bekele E, Engels JMM, et al (2010) Establishing genomic tools and resources for Guizotia abyssinica (L.f.) Cass. – the development of a library of expressed sequence tags, microsatellite loci, and the sequencing of its chloroplast genome. Mol Ecol Resour 10:1048-1058. doi:10.1111/j.1755-0998.2010.02859.x
10
Do HDK, Kim JS, Kim JH (2014) A trn I_CAU triplication event in the complete chloroplast genome of Paris verticillata M. Bieb. (Melanthiaceae, Liliales). Genome Biol Evol 6:1699-1706. doi:10.1093/gbe/evu138
11
Doorduin L, Gravendeel B, Lammers Y, Ariyurek Y, Chin-A-Woeng T, Vrieling K (2011) The complete chloroplast genome of 17 individuals of pest species Jacobaea vulgaris: SNPs, microsatellites and barcoding markers for population and phylogenetic studies. DNA Res 18:93-105. doi:10.1093/dnares/dsr002
12
Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Duran C, Field M, Heled J, Kearse M, et al (2011) GENEIOUS Pro v 7. Retrieved from http://www.geneious.com
13
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792-1797. doi:10.1093/nar/gkh340
14
Galbany-Casals M, Unwin M, Garcia-Jacas N, Smissen RD, Susanna A, Bayer RJ (2014) Phylogenetic relationships in Helichrysum (Compositae: Gnaphalieae) and related genera: incongruence between nuclear and plastid phylogenies, biogeographic and morphological patterns, and implications for generic delimitation. Taxon 63:608-624. doi:10.12705/633.8
15
Harrison PA, Vandewalle M, Sykes MT, Berry PM, Bugter R, de Bello F, Feld CK, Grandin U, Harrington R, et al (2010) Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodivers Conserv 19:2791–2821. doi:10.1007/s10531- 010-9789-x
16
Hu S, Sablok G, Wang B, Qu D, Barbaro E, Viola R, Li M, Varotto C (2015) Plastome organization and evolution of chloroplast genes in Cardamine species adapted to contrasting habitats. BMC Genomics 16:306. doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1498-0
17
Jansen RK, Palmer JD (1987a) A chloroplast DNA inversion marks an ancient evolutionary split in the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:5818-5822. doi:10.1073/pnas.84.16.5818
18
Jansen RK, Palmer JD (1987b) Chloroplast DNA from lettuce and Barnadesia (Asteraceae): structure, gene localization, and characterization of a large inversion. Curr Genet 11:553-564. doi:10.1007/BF00384619
19
Karis PO (1993) Morphological phylogenetics of the Asteraceae-Asteroideae, with notes on character evolution. Plant Syst Evol 186:69-93. doi:10.1007/BF00937714
20
Kim KJ, Jansen RK (1995) ndhF sequence evolution and the major clades in the sunflower family. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92:10379- 10383. doi:10.1073/pnas.92.22.10379
21
Kim KJ, Choi KS, Jansen RK (2005) Two chloroplast DNA inversions originated simultaneously during the early evolution of the sunflower family (Asteraceae). Mol Biol Evol 22:1783-1792. doi:10.1093/molbev/msi174
22
Kramer AT, Havens K (2009) Plant conservation genetics in a changing world. Trends Plant Sci 14:599-607. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.08.005
23
Kumar S, Hahn FM, McMahan CM, Cornish K, Whalen MC (2009) Comparative analysis of the complete sequence of the plastid genome of Parthenium argentatum and identification of DNA barcodes to differentiate Parthenium species and lines. BMC Plant Biol 9:131. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-9-131
24
Lee HL, Jansen RK, Chumley TW, Kim KJ (2007) Gene relocations within chloroplast genomes of Jasminum and Menodora (Oleaceae) are due to multiple, overlapping inversions. Mol Biol Evol 24:1161-1180. doi:10.1093/molbev/msm036
25
Li X, Zhang TC, Qiao Q, Ren Z, Zhao J, Yonezawa T, Hasegawa M, Crabbe MJC, Li J, et al (2013) Complete chloroplast genome sequence of holoparasite Cistanche deserticola (Orobanchaceae) reveals gene loss and horizontal gene transfer from its host Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae). PLoS ONE 8:e58747. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058747
26
Librado P, Rozas J (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25:1451-1452. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp187
27
Liu Y, Huo N, Dong L, Wang Y, Zhang S, Young HA, Feng X, Gu YQ (2013) Complete chloroplast genome sequences of Mongolia medicine Artemisia frigida and phylogenetic relationships with other plants. PLoS ONE 8:e57533. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057533
28
Lohse M, Drechsel O, Bock R (2007) Organellar genome DRAW (OGDRAW): a tool for the easy generation of high-quality custom graphical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Curr Genet 52:267-274. doi:10.1007/s00294-007-0161-y
29
McNeal JR, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, de Pamphilis CW (2007) Complete plastid genome sequences suggest strong selection for retention of photosynthetic genes in the parasitic plant genus Cuscuta. BMC Plant Biol 7:57. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-7-57
30
Merxmüller H, Leins P, Roessler H (1977) Inuleae – systematic review. In VH Heywood, JB Harborne, BL Turner, eds, The Biology and Chemistry of the Compositae, Vol I. Academic Press, London, UK, pp 577-602
31
Nie X, Lv S, Zhang Y, Du X, Wang L, Biradar SS, Tan X, Wan F, Weining S (2012) Complete chloroplast genome sequence of a major invasive species, crofton weed (Ageratina adenophora). PLoS ONE 7:e36869. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036869
32
Nie ZL, Funk VA, Sun H, Deng T, Meng Y, Wen J (2013) Molecular phylogeny of Anaphalis(Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae) with biogeographic implications in the Northern Hemisphere. J Plant Res 126:17-32. doi:10.1007/s10265-012-0506-6
33
Nie ZL, Funk VA, Meng Y, Deng T, Sun H, Wen J (2015) Recent assembly of the global herbaceous flora: evidence from the paper daisies (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae). New Phytol 209:1795-1806. doi:10.1111/nph.13740
34
Panero JL, Funk VA (2008) The value of sampling anomalous taxa in phylogenetic studies: major clades of the Asteraceae revealed. Mol Phylogenet Evol 47:757-782. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2008.02.011
35
Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM (2005) The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res 33:686-689. doi:10.1093/nar/gki366
36
Schmickl R, Kiefer C, Dobeš C, Koch MA (2009) Evolution of trn F (GAA) pseudogenes in cruciferous plants. Plant Syst Evol 282:229- 240. doi:10.1007/s00606-008-0030-2
37
Smissen RD, Galbany-Casals M, Breitwieser I (2011) Ancient allopolyploidy in the everlasting daisies (Asteraceae: Gnaphalieae): complex relationships among extant clades. Taxon 60:649-662
38
Stamatakis A (2006) RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22:2688–2690. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446
39
Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J (2008) A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol 57:758-771.doi:10.1080/10635150802429642
40
Takakura KI, Nishio T (2012) Safer DNA extraction from plant tissues using sucrose buffer and glass fiber filter. J Plant Res 125:805- 807. doi:10.1007/s10265-012-0502-x
41
Timme RE, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK (2007) A comparative analysis of the Lactuca and Helianthus (Asteraceae) plastid genomes: identification of divergent regions and categorization of shared repeats. Am J Bot 94:302-312. doi:10.3732/ajb.94.5.27
42
Wagstaff SJ, Breitwieser I (2002) Phylogenetic relationships of New Zealand Asteraceae inferred from ITS sequences. Pl Syst Evol 231:203-224. doi:10.1007/s006060200020
43
Walker JF, Zanis MJ, Emery NC (2015) Correction to “Comparative analysis of complete chloroplast genome sequence and inversion variation in Lasthenia burkei (Madieae, Asteraceae)”. Am J Bot 102:1008. doi:10.3732/ajb.1500990
44
Ward JM, Bayer RJ, Breitwieser I, Smissen RD, Galbany-Casals M, Unwin M (2009) Gnaphalieae – Systematic and phylogenetic review In VA Funk, A Susanna, TF Stuessy, RJ Bayer, eds, Systematics, Evolution, and Biogeography of Compositae. IAPT, Vienna, Austria, pp 537-585
45
Wicke S, Müller KF, de Pamphilis CW, Quandt D, Wickett NJ, Zhang Y, Renner SS, Schneeweiss GM (2013) Mechanisms of functional and physical genome reduction in photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic parasitic plants of the broomrape family. Plant Cell 25:3711-3725. doi:10.1105/tpc.113.113373
46
Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore JL (2004) Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics 20:3252-3255. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bth352
47
Zhang Y, Li L, Yan TL, Liu Q (2014) Complete chloroplast genome sequences of Praxelis (Eupatorium catarium Veldkamp), an important invasive species. Gene 549:58-69. doi:10.1016/j.gene.2014.07.041
48
Zheljazkov VD, Craker LE (2016) Overview of medicinal and aromatic crops. In VD Jeliazkov, CL Crantrell, eds, Medicinal and Aromatic Crops: Production, Phytochemistry, and Utilization. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, pp 1-12. doi:10.1021/bk-2016- 1218.ch001
페이지 상단으로 이동하기