Research Article

Horticultural Science and Technology. 30 June 2023. 304-314
https://doi.org/10.7235/HORT.20230028

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   Plants, Botrytis cinerea, and Preparation of the Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water

  •   Botrytis cinerea Inoculation and Pulsing Treatment of Petals or Flowers

  •   Evaluation of the Cut Flower Quality

  •   Experimental Design and Data Analysis

  • Results and Discussion

Introduction

Cut rose flowers are among the world's top three flower crops and are in demand year-round regardless of the season (Kim et al., 2022; Park and Kim, 2022). The cultivation area of cut roses in Korea amounts to 225 ha, accounting for 19% of the cultivation area of all cut flowers in Korea, and cut rose sales were the highest among all cut flowers in 2021 (MAFRA, 2022). Botrytis cinerea is a significant determinant of the cut rose flower quality after harvest among several factors, including the harvest time, temperature, relative humidity (RH), ethylene level, postharvest dry weight, bacteria characteristics, and the B. cinerea factor (de Stigter and Broekhuysen, 1989; Ha et al., 2020a). B. cinerea ranks second, after Magnaporthe oryzae, among the top ten fungal pathogens affecting plants (Dean et al., 2012). The market shares of roses, gerbera, and lisianthus with gray mold in Dutch flower auctions account for 8–10%, 22–33%, and 50%, respectively, during the distribution of cut flowers (Vrind, 2005). Economic losses associated with export-quality roses due to gray mold disease in Colombia and Kenya amount to 1.6% and 10–20%, respectively (Salgado-Salazar et al., 2018). Gray mold disease is frequently caused by high relative humidity levels exceeding 93% coupled with temperatures of 15–20°C during postharvest storage and transportation (Williamson et al., 1995; Fanourakis et al., 2013). Chemical control using fungicides is relatively inexpensive, can be easily applied on site, and both prevents and controls mole infections (Usall et al., 2016). Postharvest treatments by spraying cut rose flowers with fungicides such as iprodione (C13H13Cl2N3O3) plus thiram (C6H12N2S4), tebuconazole (C16H22ClN3O) plus dichlofluanid (C9H11Cl2FN2O2S2) and polyoxin D (C17H23N5O14) reduced disease incidence significantly by 50–58% (Elad et al., 1993). A pulsing treatment with methyl jasmonate (C13H20O3) 400 µM provides protection against Botrytis rot by activating resistance mechanisms in cut roses without decreasing the flower quality (Meir et al., 1998). A combination of specific botryticide (Roval 250SC, Scala 400SC, Teldor 500SC, and V90) sprays and fan drying reduced Botrytis infections and causes. The treatments had no adverse effects on the quality of cut roses (Goss and Mazarura, 2013). However, research on fungicide resistance is motivated currently because the global trend appears to be shifting toward the reduced use of fungicides on cut flowers (Mari et al., 2014). The development of new practices has reduced the negative impacts of pesticides on the environment and on consumer health (Daugaard, 1999; Wang et al., 2019). Therefore, researchers have sought to explore eco-friendly fungicides with antimicrobial effects against gray mold disease in cut flowers that are not resistant to fungicides. Coating mixture treatments of chitosan (0.1%) with Aloe vera pulp (25%), oregano essential oil (1%), and thyme essential oil (0.1%) do not induce damage in roses; however, the tested combinations did not reduce gray mold during postharvest treatments either (Herrera-Romero et al., 2017). Nano silver, sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), and salicylic acid (C7H6O3), which are relatively safe compared to fungicides, are also used, and a petal spray treatment with 20 mg·L-1 of nano silver was effective in inhibiting B. cinerea and improving the quality of cut rose flowers (Ha et al., 2020b). Bergmann and Dole (2018) suggest an eco-friendly alternative to fungicides; essential oils such as the leaves of Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume and flower buds of Eugenia caryophyllata Thunb were sprayed on the petals to suppress gray mold. However, these applications did not consistently control B. cinerea in rose flowers (Ha et al., 2021).

Slightly acidic electrolyzed water is environmentally safe and has been recognized for its stability and high sterilization effects in various studies, including those by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and Japan's Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (Goo and Koo, 2020). It has an effective chlorine concentration of 20–30 µL·L-1 and a pH in the range of 5.0–6.5. It exhibits a 100% sterilization effect on certain spores, including B. cinerea, Phytophthora capsici, and Colletotrichum acutatum (Yoon, 2006; Song et al., 2013). The vase life of the cut rose ‘Bubble Gum’ was effectively extended by a 5 min stem pulsing treatment with slightly acidic hypochlorous water (30 µL·L-1), which reduced bacteria in the stems (Kim et al., 2022). However, whether slightly acidic electrolyzed water as a petal pulsing solution on cut rose flowers inhibits gray mold has not been assessed. This study investigates the effects of a postharvest petal pulsing treatment with slightly acidic electrolyzed water on the vase life and quality of cut rose flowers through a reduction in B. cinerea levels.

Materials and Methods

Plants, Botrytis cinerea, and Preparation of the Slightly Acidic Electrolyzed Water

The cut rose flowers ‘Dominica’ and ‘Bubble Gum’ were cultivated via a hydroponics system and harvested at the commercial harvest phase (Kumar et al., 2008) in October and December of 2022, respectively, from a greenhouse in Gwangju, Korea. In each case, transportation took place within 30 minutes to a laboratory at Chonnam National University. In the laboratory, stems were recut to a shoot length of 40 cm, and all but three leaves were removed (Lee and Kim, 2020). Naturally occurring B. cinerea was used in this study, and it was isolated in a rose production greenhouse by the Division of Horticulture Research at Gyeonggi-do Agricultural Research & Extension Services. Its pathogenicity was confirmed by re-inoculation on rose petals followed by incubation on V8 (Campbell Soup Company, USA) agar (LPS solution, Korea) at 24°C under a blue light intensity level of 6.6 µmol·m-2·s -1 PAR and with a 14 h photoperiod for 14 days (Hwang et al., 2019). The spores were scratched using sterile water containing 0.1% Tween 20% (Samchun, Korea) and to create a 2 × 107 spores·mL-1 spore suspension. The B. cinerea conidia stock was prepared by adding 40% glycerol in an amount identical to that of the spore suspension to obtain a concentration of 1 × 107 spores·mL-1. Subsequently, 1mL of the B. cinerea conidia stock was mixed with 9 mL of PDB (potato dextrose broth, Becton, France) to obtain a solution of 1 × 106 spores·mL-1 or with 2.3 mL of PDB to obtain a solution of 3 × 105 spores·mL-1 (Fu et al., 2017; Hang et al., 2019). The stock solution of slightly acidic electrolyzed water was prepared by diluting HOCl (30 µL·L-1, pH 6.26, CNK Life Korea Inc., Korea) with distilled water. The stock was diluted to obtain solutions at the indicated concentrations, which were examined using a photometer (HI96771 Ultra High Range Chlorine Portable Photometer, ISM, Hanna Instruments Inc., USA) and a pH meter (Orion Star A211 pH Benchtop Meter, Thermo Scientific, USA).

Botrytis cinerea Inoculation and Pulsing Treatment of Petals or Flowers

To confirm the applicability of slightly acidic electrolyzed water to rose petals, three outer perianths per ‘Dominica’ stem were randomly selected in five repetitions. Petals were treated by spraying a spore suspension of 3 × 105 spores·mL-1 at 1.2 mL·flower-1, following by air-drying for one hour (Hwang et al., 2019; Lee and Kim, 2020). Petal treatments were designated as no treatment (NT, no petal pulsing treatment, and control) and HOCl treatments at concentrations of 0, 5, 10, 20, and 30 µL·L-1, into which the petals were dipped for three seconds and then allowed to dry for one hour. On day three after the treatment, gray mold incidence was measured in a controlled room at an air temperature of 21°C, RH ≥ 90, and 15.4 µmol·m-2·s-1 PPFD with a 12h photoperiod. Cut rose flowers were used in the experiments after confirming the applicability of the slightly acidic electrolyzed water to the petals. The ‘Bubble Gum’ cut roses were dried for one hour after inoculating them with gray mold (the same mold used in the petal experiment). The petal pulsing treatment of the cut rose flowers, for which the flower buds were dipped into the solution for three seconds and then dried for one hour, was done as HOCl treatments at concentrations of 0, 10, 20, and 30 µL·L-1 for three seconds (Lee and Kim, 2020). Each flower stem was placed in a vase containing 400 mL of distilled water in a 1 L glass bottle, and a completely randomized block design was used with nine replications in controlled chambers (21°C air temperature, ≥ 90% RH, and 15.4 µmol·m-2·s-1 PPFD with a 12h-photoperiod). After the treatment on day three, the disease incidence rate (%) and visual index of B. cinerea were measured (Lee et al., 2016).

Evaluation of the Cut Flower Quality

The disease incidence rate in the petals was measured in six stages by examining the rose petals blighted by B. cinerea infection. These were sage 0, no visible symptoms; stage 1, 15%; stage 2, 25%; stage 3, 50%; stage 4, 75%; and stage 5, 100% infection (Fig. 1). The incidence of gray mold on the cut flowers was calculated as the ratio of the number of diseased petals to the total number of petals, expressed as a percentage (Lee and Kim, 2020). The visual index of B. cinerea on cut roses was monitored in the following four stages: 0, no infection; 1, 1–25%; 2, 26–50%; and 3, 50–100% infection (Ha et al., 2020b). Vase life was recorded as the number of days from harvest (day 0) until the flowers began to exhibit vase life termination symptoms such as wilting petals or leaves with more than 50% of turgor loss and/or petal and leaf abscission or bending of the peduncle by a neck angle greater than 30° (Fanourakis et al., 2013). The flower color was measured according to the L* value (0, dark; 100, light), a* value (red-green; + red; –green), and b* value (yellow-blue; + yellow; –blue) using a color spectrometer (CR-400, Minolta, Japan). The ΔE* value represents a comparison of the flower color at the time of harvest with that at the time of vase life termination (McGuire, 1992). The rate of change of the flower size was expressed, in percentage, as the ratio of the size of the widest flower on day 6 after treatment to that on day 0 (Kim and Lee, 2022; Yeon et al., 2022).

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2023-041-03/N0130410307/images/HST_41_03_07_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

Six stages of symptoms of ‘Bubble Gum’ rose petals blighted by a Botrytis cinerea infection. A: no visible symptoms at stage 0, B: 15% at stage 1, C: 25% at stage 2, D: 50% at stage 3, E: 75% at stage 4, and F: 100% at stage 5.

To determine electrolyte leakage of the petals, an indicator of petal tissue damage, ten petals with diameters of 1 cm were placed in 20 mL deionized water and incubated with a shaking incubator (ThermoStable TM IS-20, DAIHAN, Korea) at 160 rpm for 18 hours at 24°C. After the initial conductivity was measured, the petals were incubated at 121°C for 20 minutes in an autoclave (MaXterile TM, DAIHAN, Korea) and then incubated while shaking at 160 rpm for 18 hours, with the final conductivity then measured (Lee et al., 2016) as follows: Electrolyte leakage (%) = [(Initial conductivity –deionized water conductivity) / (Final conductivity–deionized water conductivity)] × 100.

The chlorophyll contents of the leaves were measured using a soil plant analysis development (SPAD) chlorophyll meter (SPAD-502Plus MINOLTA, Japan). Chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm) was measured on the first edge of three-leaflet leaves using a portable chlorophyll fluorometer (MINI-PAM-II, WALZ, Germany) equipped with a leaf-chip holder for 20 minutes (WALZ, Germany) according to a method by An et al. (2022). The rate of change of the stomatal size was modeled by applying nail polish to the back of the first edge of the three-leaflet leaves, with subsequent observation at ×400 (Primostar 3, ZEISS, Germany) after attaching the sample to a slide glass (Microscope slides, SciLab, Korea; Lee et al., 2020). Measurements were taken of the stomatal pore and stomatal complex by measuring the size in dark and light conditions for 12 hours and calculating the pore size change rate via the following equation (Yi et al., 2018; Choi and Lee, 2020):

Change rate of stomatal size = (stomatal size under conditions for 12 h / stomatal size under cancer conditions for 12 h) × 100 (Yi et al., 2018; Choi and Lee, 2020).

Experimental Design and Data Analysis

A completely randomized block design was used. Analysis of variance and Duncan’s new multiple range tests (DMRT) as post-hoc analysis methods were conducted using SAS software (Statistical Analysis System, version 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Differences with p values lower than 0.05 were considered significant.

Results and Discussion

Lee et al. (2006) confirmed the importance of a postharvest fungicide treatment, as fungal infection is highly likely to occur after harvest if the petal treatment for inhibiting B. cinerea relies only on a pre-harvest treatment. We conducted tests to determine the proper pulsing treatment concentration of HOCl after harvest on the petals to inhibit gray mold. Compared to the no treatment (NT), the petal pulsing treatment with 0–30 µL·L-1 HOCl suppressed gray mold in ‘Dominica’ petals (Table 1). The treatment effect of the petals was highest at 30 µL·L-1, HOCl, resulting in a 65.6% reduction in B. cinerea compared to the NT outcome.

Table 1.

Antimicrobial effect of slightly acidic hypochlorous water (HOCl, pH 6.26) on the incidence of Botrytis cinerea infection on day three after a petal pulsing treatment of ‘Dominica’ cut rose flowers

Petal pulsing treatment (µL·L-1) The disease incidence rate in petal (%)
NTz 90 ay
HOCl 0 47 c
HOCl 5 70 b
HOCl 10 41 c
HOCl 20 36 c
HOCl 30 31 c

Petals were treated by spraying a spore suspension of 3 × 105 spores·mL-1, which was followed by air-drying for one hour.

zNT means no petal pulsing treatment.

Petal pulsing treatments were done as HOCl for three seconds with air-drying for one hour.

yMean separation within columns according to Duncan's multiple range test at p < 0.05 (n = 5).

In the ‘Bubble Gum’ cut rose flowers, the petal pulsing treatment at 30 µL·L-1 HOCl (27.8%) reduced B. cinerea by 71% compared to NT (94.6%) and reduced it by 68% compared to the 0 µL·L-1 HOCl (87.9%; Table 2). In rose ‘Dominica’ petals, the 0 µL·L-1 HOCl treatment reduced the disease incidence rate in petals compared to NT (Table 1). A tap water treatment suppresses the mycelial growth of B. cinerea in vitro, but the decay index of B. cinerea in vivo did not affect cut rose petals compared to NT (Lee et al., 2016). This study found that the treatment effect of 0 µL·L-1 HOCl differs depending on the cultivar and on the treated parts, such as petals or cut rose flowers (Tables 1 and 2). The petal pulsing treatment of distilled water or tap water without a sterilization effect had no treatment effect (Table 1). The vase life of cut rose flowers was lowest in the NT and highest in the flowers treated with 30 µL·L-1 HOCl. The disease incidence rate according to a visual index of 0 (no B. cinerea infection) was highest on flowers treated with 30 µL·L-1 HOCl, and the disease incidence rate of 3 (maximum B. cinerea infection) was highest in the NT (Fig. 2). The disease incidence rate decreased as the HOCl concentration was increased (Figs. 2 and 3). Slightly acidic electrolyzed water has high oxidation reduction potential (ORP-reaction) and dissolved chlorine (HOCl), which damages the microbial cell membrane and inactivates the defense mechanism of the microbe and oxidizes it (Schaik, 2009; Issa-Zacharia et al., 2011). Slightly acidic electrolyzed water had an antibacterial effect not only on fungi but also on certain bacterial species, such as Salmonella spp. and Yersinia enterocolitica in cabbage, Chinese celery, daikon sprouts, and lettuce (Issa-Zacharia et al., 2011; Yoon et al., 2021). The arrangement of water molecules is electrochemically altered, which allows better penetrability and interaction of the microbicidal ions. This feature is not found in conventional fungicides (Schaik, 2009). NaOCl, the most commonly used fungicide, produces disinfection byproducts and is unstable under conditions with dynamic changes in the pH, temperature, organic matter content, and light (Kim et al., 2009). Ahn (2015) found that slightly acidic electrolyzed water could replace NaOCl in treatments intended to reduce general bacteria and coliform infection levels in pickled radishes.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2023-041-03/N0130410307/images/HST_41_03_07_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.

Antimicrobial effect of slightly acidic hypochlorous water (HOCl, pH 6.26) on the disease incidence rate according to a visual index of B. cinerea on day three after the petal pulsing treatment of ‘Bubble Gum’ cut rose flowers. The visual index of B. cinerea indicated the following 0: no infection; 1: 1–25%; 2: 26–50%; and 3: 50–100% infection (Ha et al., 2020b). Error bars denote the standard errors (n = 3). Values with different letters are significantly different as analyzed by Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05). Flowers were treated by spraying a spore suspension of 3 × 105 spores·mL-1 at 1.2 mL·flower-1, followed by air-drying for one hour. NT means no petal pulsing treatment. Petal pulsing treatments were done as HOCl for three seconds with air-drying for one hour.

https://cdn.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2023-041-03/N0130410307/images/HST_41_03_07_F3.jpg
Fig. 3.

Antimicrobial effect of slightly acidic hypochlorous water (HOCl, pH 6.26) on the visual index of B. cinerea on day three after a petal pulsing treatment of the cut rose flowers (A) and petals (B) of the ‘Bubble Gum’ type. The visual index of B. cinerea indicates the following: 0: no infection; 1: 1–25%; 2: 26–50%; and 3: 50–100% infection (Ha et al., 2020b). Flowers were treated by spraying a spore suspension of 3 × 105 spores·mL-1 at 1.2 mL·flower-1, followed by air-drying for one hour. NT means no petal pulsing treatment. Petal pulsing treatments were done as HOCl for three seconds with air-drying for one hour.

Table 2.

Antimicrobial effect of slightly acidic hypochlorous water (HOCl, pH 6.26) on the vase life and incidence (%) of gray mold on day three after a petal pulsing treatment of ‘Bubble Gum’ cut rose flowers

Petal pulsing treatment (µL·L-1) Incidence (%) of gray mold Vase life (days)
NTz 94.6 a 2.2 cy
HOCl 0 87.9 a 3.0 b
HOCl 10 72.1 a 2.6 c
HOCl 20 58.5 ab 3.6 a
HOCl 30 27.8 b 3.9 a

The test room was maintained under the following conditions: air temperature 21°C, RH ≥ 90, and 15.4 µmol·m-2·s-1 PPFD with a 12h photoperiod.

Flowers were treated by spraying a spore suspension of 3 × 105 spores·mL-1 at 1.2 mL·flower-1, followed by air-drying for one hour.

zNT means no petal pulsing treatment.

Petal pulsing treatments were done as HOCl for three seconds with air-drying for one hour.

yMean separation within columns according to Duncan`s multiple range test at p < 0.05. There were nine replications for the experiments on the vase life with a non-destructive analysis and three for the experiments on the incidence of gray mold via a destructive analysis.

A quality analysis of the cut flowers was conducted to assess whether the petal pulsing treatment with slightly acidic electrolyzed water induces petal damage. The petal color of roses is an important factor affecting the market value and quality of flowers (Roberts et al., 2003; Lim et al., 2011). The treatments did not cause any changes in the L* values, representing lightness (Table 3). Nor were there treatment-induced differences in the a* values, which represent the bluish-green to red-purple hue component, or in the b* values, which represent the yellow to blue hue components. The only difference noted was that between the NT and the day 0 treatments. NT exhibited the highest rate of color change as measured in ΔE* compared to the day 0 treatment, with the color being most stable in petals treated with HOCl. Discoloration of petals by gray mold is a significant factor causing a quality decline in Korean roses exported to Japan (Park and Park, 2006). The antifungal effects of the petal pulsing treatment with slightly acidic electrolyzed water did not cause any apparent damage to the petals, especially discoloration. Electrolyte leakage of the petals, which indicates petal tissue damage, was highest in the NT, and there was no petal tissue damage in petals treated with HOCl or distilled water (Table 4; Lee et al., 2016). Kim et al. (2009) suggest that hypochlorous acid water, including slightly acidic electrolyzed water, chlorine dioxide (ClO2), and ozonated (O3) water, is an alternative fungicide that can overcome the shortcomings of chlorine as a fungicide, with various advantages other than sterilization. As a result of simulating export distribution after a petal pulsing treatment with 5 µL·L-1 ClO2 for two seconds with a compound containing chlorine, gray mold was found to be suppressed without affecting the color, electrolyte leakage, or volatile compounds of the petals (Lee and Kim, 2020). The process of the petal pulsing treatment is identical to that of the petal dipping treatment. The petal pulsing treatment of cut roses with sulfur dioxide (SO2) and potassium permanganate (KMnO4) followed by dry transportation to cartons suppressed gray mold (van Jaarsveld, 2018). The petal pulsing treatment with 50°C hot water suppressed B. cinerea but induced various forms of petal damage, such as increased respiration, absorption, and reduced vase life at higher temperatures and longer treatment times (Lee et al., 2016). Therefore, a petal pulsing treatment that suppresses disease without affecting the quality of the petals is needed.

Table 3.

Antimicrobial effect of slightly acidic hypochlorous water (HOCl, pH 6.26) on the flower color on day three after a petal pulsing treatment of ‘Bubble Gum’ cut rose flowers

Petal pulsing treatment (µL·L-1) Hunter valuezΔE*y
L* a* b*
day 0x 40.95 aw 50.63 a 13.45 b 0.00 c
NTv 46.92 a 27.72 b 21.33 a 23.34 a
HOCl 0 43.60 a 46.60 a 11.77 bc 10.81 b
HOCl 10 40.77 a 46.38 a 12.36 bc 7.52 bc
HOCl 20 43.40 a 50.80 a 11.41 bc 3.83 bc
HOCl 30 39.38 a 45.04 a 9.73 bc 4.54 bc

The test room was maintained under the following conditions: air temperature 21°C, RH ≥ 90, and 15.4 µmol·m-2·s-1 PPFD with a 12h photoperiod.

Flowers were treated by spraying a spore suspension of 3 × 105 spores·mL-1 at 1.2 mL·flower-1, followed by air-drying for one hour.

zL*: lightness (0 = black, 100 = white), a*: red-green (+ = red, − = green), b*: yellow-blue (+ = yellow, − = blue).

yΔE* = (ΔL)2+(Δa)2+(Δb)2

xThe flowers were immediately transported after harvest before treatment on day 0.

wMean separation within columns according to Duncan's multiple range test at p < 0.05 (n = 9).

vNT means no petal pulsing treatment.

Petal pulsing treatments were done as HOCl for three seconds with air-drying for one hour.

The flowering rate of cut roses at the end of their vase life is one of the critical measures of the quality of cut flowers (Lee et al., 2005). In this study, the flowering rate was lowest in the NT, and there were few differences among the treatments (Table 4). There were no significant differences among the treatments onchlorophyll content and Fv/Fm of the leaves, indicating no damage to the quality of the leaves. In healthy plants, the Fv/Fm ratio is 0.80–0.83, decreasing if the photosynthetic reaction center in photosystem II is damaged or exposed to stress (Jung, 2002). In all treatments, the Fv/Fm was 0.81–0.83, indicating that the photosynthetic reaction center of the leaf was not damaged or not compromised due to the treatments (Table 4). The stomatal size change rate of the leaf is related to stomata opening and closing (KSFS, 2021). The smaller it is, the higher the moisture loss rate through the stomata, which shortens the vase life of cut roses (Fanourakis et al., 2013). The stomatal size change rate of the complex increased upon a treatment with 30 µL·L-1 HOCl by 45.4 and 47.9% compared to the NT or 0 µL·L-1 HOCl, respectively, but there were no significant differences among the treatments (Table 4). In conclusion, a postharvest petal pulsing treatment of cut rose flowers with 30 µL·L-1 HOCl reduced B. cinerea. It did not cause any apparent damage to the petals, such as discoloration or tissue damage, and did not affect the flowering rate and leaves, as measured by the chlorophyll content, Fv/Fm, and stomatal size change rate. Overall, these results suggest that immediate petal pulsing with slightly acidic electrolyzed water with 30 µL·L-1 HOCl is feasible for inhibiting gray mold on cut rose flowers.

Table 4.

Antimicrobial effect of slightly acidic hypochlorous water (HOCl, pH 6.26) on the rate of change of the flower size, electrolyte leakage of the petals, and the chlorophyll contents, chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), and rate of change of the stomatal size of the leaves on day three after a petal pulsing treatment of ‘Bubble Gum’ cut rose flowers

Petal pulsing
treatment (µL·L-1)
Change rate of
flower size
Electrolyte
leakage (%)z
Chlorophyll
contents
Fv/Fm Change rate of stomatal size (%)y
pore complex
NTx 99.79 bw 31 a 40.5 a 0.82 a 134.51 a 128.62 a
HOCl 0 111.41 ab 25 b 42.3 a 0.83 a 160.87 a 126.48 a
HOCl 10 105.60 ab 28 ab 42.1 a 0.83 a 105.67 a 128.03 a
HOCl 20 113.66 a 25 b 40.5 a 0.81 a 116.10 a 111.28 a
HOCl 30 107.03 ab 24 b 42.8 a 0.83 a 125.59 a 187.06 a

The test room was maintained under the following conditions: air temperature 21°C, RH ≥ 90, and 15.4 µmol·m-2·s-1 PPFD with a 12h photoperiod.

Flowers were treated by spraying a spore suspension of 3 × 105 spores·mL-1 at 1.2 mL·flower-1, followed by air-drying for one hour.

zElectrolyte leakage of the petals was analyzed on day one after the petal pulsing treatment.

yThe stomatal size change rate is calculated via (stomatal area on light / stomatal area on dark) × 100.

xNT means no petal pulsing treatment.

Petal pulsing treatments were done by dipping the petals for three seconds, followed by air-drying for one hour.

wMean separation within columns according to Duncan's multiple range test at p < 0.05. There were ten replications for the assessments of the change rate of the flower size, chlorophyll contents, and Fv/Fm via a non-destructive analysis and three for the assessments of the electrolyte leakage and rate of change of the stomatal size via a destructive analysis.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (NRF-2021R1G1A1094351).

References

1
Ahn SK (2015) Effects of slightly acidic electrolyzed water treatment on microbial reduction in salted young radish. Master's thesis. Chung-Ang University, Korea
2
An HR, Lee SY, Park PM, Kim YJ (2022) Effects of substrate water contents on post-shipping performance of Phalaenopsis. Hortic Sci Technol 40:52-62. doi:10.7235/HORT.20220006 10.7235/HORT.20220006
3
Bergmann BA, Dole JM (2018) Influence of essential oils on post-infection Botrytis damage in cut roses. J Environ Hort 36:45-57. doi:10.24266/JEH-D-17-0012.1 10.24266/JEH-D-17-0012.1
4
Choi SY, Lee AK (2020) Development of a cut rose longevity prediction model using thermography and machine learning. J Kor Hortic Sci 38:675-685. doi:10.7235/HORT.20200061 10.7235/HORT.20200061
5
Daugaard H (1999) Cultural methods for controlling Botrytis cinerea Pers. in strawberry. Biol Agric Hortic 16:351-361. doi:10.1080/01448765.1999.9755238 10.1080/01448765.1999.9755238
6
de Stigter HCM, Broekhuysen AGM (1989) Secondary gas embolism as an effect of disturbed water balance in cut roses. Acta Hortic 261:17-26. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.261.2 10.17660/ActaHortic.1989.261.2
7
Dean R, Van Kan JAL, Pretorius ZA, Hammond-Kosack KE, Pietro AD, Spanu PD, Rudd JJ, Dickman M, Kahmann R, et al. (2012) The top 10 fungal pathogens in molecular plant pathology. Mol Plant Pathol 13:414-430. doi:10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2011.00783.x22471698PMC6638784
8
Elad Y, Kirshner B, Gotlib Y (1993) Attempts to control Botrytis cinerea on roses by pre- and postharvest treatments with biological and chemical agents. Crop prot 12:69-73. doi:10.1016/0261-2194(93)90023-C 10.1016/0261-2194(93)90023-C
9
Fanourakis D, Pieruschka R, Savvides A, Macnish AJ (2013) Sources of vase life variation in cut roses: A review. Postharvest Biol Technol 78:1-15. doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.12.001 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2012.12.001
10
Fu Y, van Silfhout A, Shahin A, Egberts R, Beers M, van der Velde A, van Houten A, van Tuyl JM, Visser RGF, et al. (2017) Genetic mapping and QTL analysis of Botrytis resistance in Gerbera hybrida. Mol Breed 37:13. doi:10.1007/s11032-016-0617-1 10.1007/s11032-016-0617-128216997PMC5285436
11
Goo SG, Koo J (2020) Establishment of rice Bakanae disease management using slightly acidic chlorous acid water. J Life Sci 30:178-185. doi:10.5352/JLS.2020.30.2.178 10.5352/JLS.2020.30.2.178
12
Goss M, Mazarura U (2013) Efficacy of post-harvest fungicide sprays and fan-drying for the control of gray mould (Botrytis cinerea) in roses (Rosacea hybridus var. annabella). J Agric Technol 9:479-486
13
Ha STT, Choi B, In BC (2021) Nature and regulation of Botrytis cinerea in Rosa hybrida. Flower Res J 29:129-137. doi:10.11623/frj.2021.29.3.02 10.11623/frj.2021.29.3.02
14
Ha STT, Jung YO, Lim JH (2020a) Pretreatment with Scutellaria baicalensis georgi extract improves the postharvest quality of cut roses (Rosa hybrida L.). Hortic Environ Biotechnol 61:511-524. doi:10.1007/s13580-020-00238-6 10.1007/s13580-020-00238-6
15
Ha STT, Kim YT, In BC (2020b) Assessment of preservative solutions for reducing Botrytis cinerea infection in cut roses. Flower Res J 28:279-284. doi:10.11623/frj.2020.28.4.06 10.11623/frj.2020.28.4.06
16
Herrera-Romero I, Ruales C, Caviedes M, Leon-Reyes A (2017) Postharvest evaluation of natural coatings and antifungal agents to control Botrytis cinerea in Rosa sp. Phytoparasitica 45:9-20. doi:10.1007/s12600-017-0565-2 10.1007/s12600-017-0565-2
17
Hwang KH, Hong SM, Lee YS, Lee HJ (2019) Difference of gray mold severity at roses caused by Botrytis cinerea strains. Res Plant Dis 25:16-21. doi:10.5423/RPD.2019.25.1.16 10.5423/RPD.2019.25.1.16
18
Issa-Zacharia A, Kamitani Y, Miwa N, Muhimbula H, Iwasaki K (2011) Application of slightly acidic electrolyzed water as a potential non-thermal food sanitizer for decontamination of fresh ready-to-eat vegetables and sprouts. Food Contol 22:601-607. doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.10.011 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.10.011
19
Jung BC (2002) BioWave, A study on the characteristics of photosynthetic organisms using chlorophyll fluorescence. https://www.ibric.org › myboard › view. Accessed 1 February 2023
20
Kim JH, Lee YB (2022) Treatment concentration of ozone and sucrose to extend the vase life of the cut rose 'Dominica'. Flower Res J 30:69-74. doi:10.11623/frj.2022.30.2.04 10.11623/frj.2022.30.2.04
21
Kim YR, Kim JH, Lee YB (2022) Pulsing treatment of slightly acidic hypochlorous water to extend the vase life of cut rose 'Bubble Gum'. Flower Res J 30:205-210. doi:10.11623/frj.2022.30.4.05 10.11623/frj.2022.30.4.05
22
Kim YS, Park IS, Ha SD (2009) Application sanitizer for the control of microorganisms in food. Food Sci Industry 44:467-471
23
Korea Society for Floricultural Science (KSFS) (2021) Floriculture. Worldscience, Korea, pp 261-262
24
Kumar N, Srivastava GC, Dixit K (2008) Hormonal regulation of flower senescence in roses (Rosa hybrida L.). Plant Growth Regul 55:65-71. doi:10.1007/s10725-008-9259-6 10.1007/s10725-008-9259-6
25
Lee JH, Choi JW, Hong YP, Kwon OH (2016) Hot water dipping on reduction of grey mold (Botrytis cinerea) in cut rose 'Antique Curl'. Flower Res J 24:304-311. doi:10.10.11623/frj.2016.24.4.09 10.11623/frj.2016.24.4.09
26
Lee JH, Yoon JW, Oh SI, Lee AK (2020) Relationship between cultivation environment and postharvest quality of cut rose 'Lovely lydia'. J Kor Hortic 38:263-270 doi:10.7235/HORT.20200025 10.7235/HORT.20200025
27
Lee JS, Han KS, Park JH, Cheong SR, Jang HI (2006) Control of gray mold (Botrytis cinerea) on roses by pre-and Post-harvest treatments with agricultural chemicals. Res Plant Dis 12:249-253. doi:10.5423/RPD.2006.12.3.249 10.5423/RPD.2006.12.3.249
28
Lee JS, Park CH, Seo JK, Jung JH, Jung BY, Kim YY, Kim KW (2005) Floriculture quality keeping or process. Wizvalley, Seoul, Korea, pp 70-147
29
Lee YB, Kim WS (2020) ClO2 dipping treatment inhibits gray mold on cut rose flowers during storage. The Hort J 89:496-501. doi:10.2503/hortj.UTD-138 10.2503/hortj.UTD-138
30
Lim SH, Kim JK, Kim DH, Sohn SH, Lee JY, Kim YM, Ha SH (2011) Flower color modification by manipulating flavonoid biosynthetic pathway. Hortic Sci Technol 29:511-522
31
Mari M, Francesco AD, Bertolini P (2014) Control of fruit postharvest diseases: old issues and innovative approaches. Stewart Postharvest Rev 1:1-4. doi:10.2212/spr.2014.1.1 10.2212/spr.2014.1.1
32
McGuire RG (1992) Reporting of objective color measurements. Hortic Sci 27:1254-1255. doi:10.21273/HORTSCI.27.12.1254 10.21273/HORTSCI.27.12.1254
33
Meir S, Droby S, Davidson H, Alsevia S, Cohen L, Horev B, Philosoph-Hadas S (1998) Suppression of Botrytis rot in cut rose flowers by postharvest application of methyl jasmonate. Postharvest Biol Technol 13:235-243. doi:10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00017-9 10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00017-9
34
Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (2022) Flower cultivation status in 2021. pp 42-43
35
Park KH, Park HT (2006) A competitiveness and promotion subjects of Korean roses in Japanese flower markets. Kor J of Agr Mgt and Policy 33:495-518
36
Park KY, Kim YS (2022) Analysis of domestic cut rose varieties and phylogenetic preference: focusing on cut roses fostered by the national institute of horticultural and herbal science. J Kor Soc Floral Art & Design 46:131-147. doi:10.52706/KSFAD.46.8 10.52706/KSFAD.46.8
37
Roberts AV, Debener T, Gudin S (2003) Encyclopedia of rose science. 1st ed, Elsvier, USA 10.1016/B0-12-227620-5/90003-X
38
Salgado-Salazar C, Shishkoff N, Daughtrey M, Plmer CL, Crouch JA (2018) Downy mildew: A serious disease threat to rose health worldwide. Plant Dis 102:1873-1882. doi:10.1094/PDIS-12-17-1968-FE 10.1094/PDIS-12-17-1968-FE30110245
39
Schaik M (2009) Food safety, chemicals, toxins and electrolyzed water. Aquaox company publication. http://aquaox.wordpress.com/2009/10/12/food-safety-chemicals-toxins-and-electrolyzed-water/ Accessed 1 February 2023
40
Song JY, Kim NR, Nam MH, Park BJ, Whang EI, Choi JM, Kim HG (2013) Fungicidal effect of slightly acidic hypochlorous water against phytopathogenic fungi. Korean J Mycol 41:274-279. doi:10.4489/KJM.2013.41.4.274 10.4489/KJM.2013.41.4.274
41
Usall J, Ippolito A, Sisquella M, Neri F (2016) Physical treatments to control postharvest diseases of fresh fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biol Technol 122:30-40. doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.05.002 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.05.002
42
van Jaarsveld AJ (2018) Flower preservation method and device. US patent 9,974,309 B2
43
Vrind TA (2005) The Botrytis problem in figures. Acta Hort 699:99-102. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.669.11 10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.669.11
44
Wang C, Yuan S, Zhang W, Ng T, Ye X (2019) Buckwheat antifungal protein with biocontrol potential to inhibit fungal (Botrytis cinerea) Infection of Cherry Tomato. J Agric Food Chem 67:6748-6756. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01144 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b0114431136167
45
Williamson B, Duncan GH, Harrison JG, Harding LA, Elad Y, Zimand G (1995) Effect of humidity on infection of rose petals by dry-inoculated conidia of Botrytis cinerea. Mycological Res 99:1303-1310. doi:10.1016/S0953-7562(09)81212-4 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)81212-4
46
Yeon JY, Lee S, Lee KJ, Kim WS (2022) Flowering responses in the cut rose 'Vital' to non-optimal temperatures. Hortic Sci Technol 40:471-480. doi:10.7235/HORT.20220042 10.7235/HORT.20220042
47
Yi H, Rui Y, Kandemir B, Wang JZ, Anderson CT, Puri VM (2018) Mechanical effects of cellulose, xyloglucan, and pectins on stomatal guard cells of Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 9:1566. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01566 10.3389/fpls.2018.0156630455709PMC6230562
48
Yoon SR (2006) Studies on properties and disinfection effect of strong acidic electrolyzed water (SEW) and weak acidic electrolyzed water (WEW). MS thesis, Gangneung Nati Univ, Gangneung, Korea
49
Yoon SR, Lee JY, Yang JS, Ha JH (2021) Bactericidal effects of diluted slightly acidic electrolyzed water in quantitative suspension and cabbage tests. LWT-Food Sci Technol 152:112291. doi:10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112291 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112291
페이지 상단으로 이동하기