Horticultural Science and Technology. 31 October 2017. 618-627
https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20170066

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   Plant Material

  •   DNA Extraction

  •   Sequencing the nor Gene and Polymorphism Detection

  •   High-resolution Melting Analysis in the Germplasm Collection

  • Results and Discussion

  •   Discovery of Sequence Variation in the nor Gene in Tomato

  •   Gene-based Marker Development and Genotyping in a Collection of Tomato Varieties

Introduction

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is one of the most widely consumed fresh fruit vegetables in the world. Tomato fruits make a significant contribution to human nutrition due to their abundant vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants (Raiola et al., 2014; Perveen et al., 2015). As a climacteric and perishable vegetable, tomato fruit has a relatively short life after ripening due to biological processes affecting fruit quality during the postharvest stage (Zapata et al., 2008). The quality and nutritional value of ripening fruit are greatly reduced by postharvest handling and storage practices (Sablani et al., 2006), with a loss of fresh tomato fruit that can be as much as 45.32% (Kasso and Bekele, 2016). Therefore, a number of strategies have been developed to improve fruit quality and shelf-life such as refrigeration, heat treatment, modified atmosphere packaging (MAP), and 1-methylcyclopropent (1-MCP) and calcium chloride (CaCl2) application (Arah et al., 2016). Although effective in limiting postharvest losses, these methods can be costly and time-consuming, especially for small farms (Hoering, 2012). The use of ripening mutant genes, however, eliminates these disadvantages and is an effective strategy in tomato breeding programs.

Several tomato ripening genes have been reported including ripening-inhibitor (rin) (Robinson and Tomes, 1968; Vrebalov et al., 2002), non-ripening (nor) (Tigchelaar et al., 1973), Colorless non-ripening (Cnr) (Thompson et al., 1999; Eriksson et al., 2004; Manning et al., 2006), Green-ripe (Gr) (Kerr, 1958; Barry and Giovannoni, 2006), Never-ripe (Nr) (Lanahan et al., 1994), and alcobaca (alc) (Kopeliovitch et al., 1981). These genes participate independently and cooperatively in the fruit ripening process. For example, the rin mutation produces a partially deleted MADS-box protein that is a ripening-specific transcription factor and results in effectively blocking the fruit ripening process leading to green fruits (Vrebalov et al., 2002). The heterozygous mutation of the rin gene (rin/Rin) is often used to produce slow ripening and long shelf-life tomatoes (Giovannoni, 2007). Similarly, the mutation in the nor gene encoding a NAC transcription factor fails to initiate the normal ripening process and results in fruits that do not soften (Lincoln and Fischer, 1988; Giovannoni, 2004). The nor gene can be also used in the heterozygous form (nor/Nor) to improve shelf-life of tomato fruit. The NAC transcription factor family is important for diverse physiological process during development including stress response, flowering, and senescence (Martel et al., 2011). The nor mutation enhances disease resistance by up-regulating the expression of several genes associated with defense mechanisms that biotic stress, including the resistance of tomato fruit to Botrytis cinerea (Cantu et al., 2009).

Conventional plant breeding based on phenotypic selection is generally labor-intensive and time-consuming. Conversely, the use of molecular markers associated with traits of interest can be a cost-effective and accurate option to develop new elite varieties (Phan and Sim, 2017). Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technology have facilitated association mapping with genome-wide molecular markers such as single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and insertion and deletion (InDel). These efforts have led to the discovery of a number of markers associated with major genes and quantitative trait loci (QTL) (Truong et al., 2015; Devran et al., 2016; Veerappan et al., 2016). However, these markers are not always effective for breeding populations due to linkage disequilibrium (LD) decay. Gene-based markers can be more practical relative to the gene-associated markers for marker-assisted selection (MAS) in breeding programs. Although the molecular and biochemical basis of fruit ripening has been intensively studied in tomato, molecular markers for breeding have been less utilized in comparison to other traits such as disease resistance. Recently, a sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) marker was developed for the rin mutation (Kim et al., 2013); however, few studies have developed molecular markers for the nor mutation, which is more effective for long shelf-life relative to the rin gene (Ng, 1976). Thus, the objectives of our study were to 1) detect sequence variations between the nor mutant and wild type varieties, 2) develop a gene-based marker for MAS to improve tomato fruit quality and long shelf-life, and 3) investigate the nor mutation in a collection of 81 inbred and commercial F1 hybrid varieties based on our gene-based marker.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials

Three tomato accessions, ‘San Marzano’ (wild-type allele, Nor/Nor), ‘LA1793’, and ‘LA3013’ (both mutant alleles, nor/nor) were provided by the C. M. Rick Tomato Genetics Resource Center at University of California, Davis, CA and used to investigate sequence variation in the nor gene. In addition, we used 81 other varieties to validate the resulting nor sequence variation(s). This germplasm panel consisted of 30 inbred and 51 commercial F1 hybrid varieties from public and private breeding programs in South Korea. The inbred varieties were collected from the National Agrobiodiveristy Center (20 varieties) and National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science (10 varieties) at Rural Development Administration (RDA). For the F1 hybrids, 51 varieties were derived from Bunong Seed (10 varieties), Monsanto-Korea (nine varieties), Nongwoo Bio (six varieties), Syngenta-Korea (five varieties), Takki-Korea, PPS (three varieties from each company), Jinheung Seed, NH-Nonghyup, Koregon, Asian Seed, and Konong (two varieties from each company); and the rest five varieties were from Sky Seed, Sakata-Korea, Dongwon Nongsan, Hyeondae Seed, and Gana Seed.

DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was isolated from young leaves from seedlings using the CTAB method with minor modifications (Kabelka et al., 2002). Young leaf tissue was placed in a 2.0 mL micro-centrifuge tube containing 350 µL DNA extraction-lysis buffer and ground in a TissueLyser II (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) at 300 strokes per minute for 5 min. After incubation at 65°C for 20 min, 350 µL of chloroform: isoamyl (24:1) was added and then centrifuged at 5,000 g for 10 min. The supernatant was separated and mixed with 200 µL ice cold isopropanol, keep stable at 4°C for 1 h, followed by centrifugation at 5,000 g for 15 min. The DNA pellet was rinsed twice with 70% ethanol, dried at room temperature, and re-suspended in 100 mL TE buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 0.1 mM EDTA). The quantity and quality of DNA sample were measured using agarose gel electrophoresis and diluted to 50 ng·µL-1 for PCR amplification and high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis.

Sequencing the nor Gene and Polymorphism Detection

The full length of the nor gene (SGN Gene ID: Solyc10g006880) was retrieved from the tomato reference genome assembly version 2.50 (Tomato Genome Consortium, 2012; https://www.solgenomics.net). A set of primers was designed to amplify all of the exons and introns as well as 2 kb of the upstream region from the start codon using the Primer3Plus version 2.4.0 (Untergasser et al., 2012). PCR amplification was performed in a total reaction volume of 50 µL that contained 50-100 ng genomic DNA, 0.25 µM each primer, 0.2 mM dNTPs, 1X PCR buffer, and 0.5 U DNA Taq polymerase (Geneslabs, Seongnam, Korea). The amplification profile consisted of an initial denaturation for 3 min at 94°C followed by 40 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at an selected annealing temperature (50°C to 60°C depending on the melting temperature of primers), 45 s at 72°C, and one cycle of 7 min at 72°C as a final extension step. The amplified product was separated on a 1.5% agarose gel containing 1X RedSafeTM Nucleic Acid Staining Solution (20,000X) (JH Science, Lynnwood, WA, USA) in 1X TBE at 200 V for 1 h. The target DNA was collected and purified using the MinElute® Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions and resulted in samples that were used for Sanger sequencing (Cosmogenetech, Seoul, Korea). The resulting DNA sequences were trimmed and aligned using the Staden Package software (Bonfield et al., 1995) and Clustal Omega tool (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). Sequence variations between the mutants (‘LA1793’ and ‘LA3013’) and wild-type (‘San Marzano’) varieties were identified by visual inspection of the sequence alignment.

High-resolution Melting Analysis in the Germplasm Collection

The primers for high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis were designed to produce an expected product size between 100-300 bp using the Primer3Plus version 2.4.0. The primer sequences were then analyzed using In Silico PCR at the SOL Genomic Network (https://solgenomics.net/tools/in_silico_pcr) to detect any possible unspecific products, ensuring the PCR amplification efficiency and HRM accuracy. HRM analysis was performed in a total volume of 20 µL using the LightCyler96 Real-Time PCR System (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA). The reaction mixture contained 50 ng qualified genomic DNA, 0.25 µM forward and reverse primers, and LightCycler® 480 HRM Master Mix 1X (Roche Diagnostics). The amplification was achieved by the following the protocol: 10 min initial denaturation at 95°C, 45 cycles of 10 s for denaturation at 95°C, 15 s at 55°C, 15 s at 72°C, followed by denaturation at 95°C for 15 s, 50°C for 10 s, 50°C for 50 s, 97°C for 1 s, with HRM ramping between 50°C and 97°C at 2.2°C/s increments.

Results and Discussion

Discovery of Sequence Variation in the nor Gene in Tomato

The nor gene originated from a spontaneous mutation in tomato on the short arm of chromosome 10 (Giovannoni et al., 1995). This gene has an open reading frame (ORF) consisting of three exons (356, 314, and 725 bp) and two introns (629 and 779 bp) (Fig. 1). Our eight primer sets produced PCR amplicons between 482-810 bp for the upstream and ORF regions of the nor gene in the two mutants ‘LA1793’ and ‘LA3013’, and a wild type ‘San Marzano’. The 4.8 kb sequences (2.0 kb upstream and 2.8 kb ORF) were generated from these amplicons and aligned to identify single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) and/or insertion and deletion (InDel). We detected a 2 bp InDel (AA/--) within the third exon, which was the longest exon of the nor gene (Fig. 2). This InDel causes a frame-shift that results in change of the polypeptide sequence from the glutamine at the amino acid 183 (Fig. 3). This mutation is the only sequence variation associated with fruit ripening in the nor gene. The rin mutation is also derived from a frame-shift in a MADS-box gene of the SEPELATTA clade (Hileman et al., 2006). For the Cnr gene, however, mutant phenotype is due to a spontaneous epigenetic change in the SBP-box (SQUAMODA promoter binding protein-like) promoter (Manning et al., 2006). The molecular mechanism of the nor gene for regulating fruit ripening still remains unclear compared to the rin and Cnr genes in tomato. Therefore, the InDel identified in our study can be useful to elucidate the nor gene function in the ripening process.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2017-035-05/N0130350510/images/Figure_KSHS_35_05_10_F1.jpg
Fig. 1.

A schematic of the nor gene (4.8 kb) sequenced in this study. The region includes the 2 kb upstream sequence and 2.8 kb open reading frame that consists of three exons (black boxes) and two introns (solid lines between exons).

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2017-035-05/N0130350510/images/Figure_KSHS_35_05_10_F2.jpg
Fig. 2.

Sequence alignment of part of the 3rd exon of the nor gene between wild-type (Heinz 1706 and San Marzano) and mutant (LA1793 and LA3013) varieties. The “*” indicates identical nucleotides between these sequences. The 1st codon of the 3rd exon is indicated with bold letters and underlined. The gray boxes represent the HRM primer sequences.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2017-035-05/N0130350510/images/Figure_KSHS_35_05_10_F3.jpg
Fig. 3.

Amino acid sequence alignment for the nor gene between wild-type (Heinz 1706 and San Marzano) and mutant (LA1793 and LA3013) varieties. The “*” indicates identical amino acid. The “:”, “.”, and no mark indicate high, low, and no similarity in the individual amino acids, respectively.

Table 1. The eight primer sets used to amplify the nor gene http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2017-035-05/N0130350510/images/Table_KSHS_35_05_10_T1.jpg

zF and R indicate forward and reverse primers, respectively.

yTm = melting temperature.

Gene-based Marker Development and Genotyping in a Collection of Tomato Varieties

Based on the InDel in the 3rd exon, a primer set for a nor-InDel marker (forward: 5ʹ-TGCAGCTAGATGATTGGGTTT-3ʹ, reverse: 5ʹ-ACCTCCATGCATCGTTCTCT-3ʹ) was designed for HRM analysis. This primer set produced a 269 bp amplicon at an annealing temperature of 55°C and was used to genotype a collection of 83 tomato varieties including ‘LA1793’ and ‘San Marzano’. The InDel marker clearly differentiated the mutant allele (nor) from the wild type allele (Nor) (Table 2). Among these varieties, the homozygous form of nor was found in the two inbreds, ‘14KT-5-24’ and ‘14KT-6-10’ derived from National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science (NIHHS) at Rural Development Administration (RDA). Among the 51 commercial F1 hybrids, ‘Gayachal Plus’ from Syngenta-Korea had the heterozygous mutation (nor/Nor) (Table 2). The ‘14KT-5-24’ variety produces yellow fruit, whereas the ‘14KT-6-10’ and ‘Gayachal Plus’ varieties have pink fruit. Since abnormally ripened fruits that are green or yellow in color and common in the homozygous nor mutants (Tigchelaar et al., 1973), it was unexpected that the ‘14KT-6-10’ variety has the nor/nor genotype. Although the ‘14KT-6-10’ variety produces pink fruit, its fruit is firmer relative to wild type varieties with normally ripened fruit, which is similar to the other inbred ‘14KT-5-24’ variety. Fruit firmness is an important factor affecting storage period and fruit quality after harvesting (Batu, 2004; De Ketelaere et al., 2004). This trait is mainly enhanced by cellulose and its cross-linkage with hemicellulose, pectin, and lignin (Vicente et al., 2007). The two cellulose synthases are more abundant in the nor mutant relative to a wild-type, indicating that the nor mutation has a positive effect to improve fruit firmness (Seymour et al., 2013). Tomato varieties with the heterozygous form of nor recovers normal fruit color but enhances fruit firmness. Thus, the heterozygous genotype is favorable for improving fruit quality and shelf-life in elite tomato varieties. Our result supports the effect of the nor mutation on fruit firmness and demonstrates that the nor-InDel marker is effective in detecting the nor mutation.

Table 2. Genotypes of 83 tomato varieties via high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis using the gene-based marker developed for the nor gene http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2017-035-05/N0130350510/images/Table_KSHS_35_05_10_T2.jpg
Table 2. continued http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2017-035-05/N0130350510/images/Table_KSHS_35_05_10_T2_1.jpg

zThe inbred and F1 hybrid varieties were collected from TGRC (Tomato Genetics Resource Center), NAC (National Agrobiodiversity Center), NIHHS (National Institute of Horticultural & Herbal Science), and seed companies.

yNor indicates the wild-type allele and nor indicates the mutant allele for the non-ripening (nor) gene.

One of the main challenges in the tomato industry is to deliver fresh fruits of high quality (e.g. desirable taste, texture, and color). Fruit ripening is a complex process that involves numerous physiological and biochemical changes in color, carotenoid biosynthesis (Pék and Helyes, 2010), sugar content (Davies and Kempton, 1975), firmness, and pathogen resistance (Kramer et al., 1992; Wang et al., 2017). Therefore, the regulation of the ripening process is central to improve fruit quality in tomato. Many efforts have been made in the genetic dissection of the ripening process and a number of ripening genes have been identified. Of these genes, spontaneous frame-shift mutations in the rin and nor genes exhibit similar phenotypes in fruit ripening. The individuals that are heterozygous at these loci recover normal color and have firmer fruit relative to plants that are homozygous form of wild type alleles. With this knowledge, the use of these mutations has helped to develop elite tomato varieties in breeding programs. Among the 81 tomato varieties used in this study, only two inbred and one F1 hybrid varieties have homozygous or heterozygous forms of the nor mutation, suggesting that this mutation is not widely used in tomato breeding programs. This may be due to a lack of an efficient molecular tool to facilitate introgression of this mutation into elite breeding lines.

Selection based on phenotypes often requires intensive field evaluations to eliminate environmental variation. Marker-assisted selection (MAS) is an effective approach that can accelerate plant breeding because breeding lines with favorable alleles are selected based on their genotypes, which are neutral for environmental variation. The molecular mechanism of rin in the ripening process have been studied more relative to nor (Vrebalov et al., 2002; Yuan et al., 2016), and the SCAR marker associated with the rin mutation was also developed for MAS (Kim et al., 2013). In the present study, an InDel responsible for a frame-shift mutation was detected in the nor gene and used to develop a gene-based marker that can be applied to MAS for the identification of this mutation. With this marker, we determined the genotype of nor in a collection of 81 tomato varieties representing 30 inbreds and 51 commercial F1 hybrids. Our results benefit the tomato research community, particularly breeders, by utilizing MAS for improving shelf-life and quality in tomato fruits.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Next Gene-ration BioGreen 21 Program (Project No. PJ01185703) and the National Agricultural Genome Program (Project No. PJ01043804), Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea to S.Sim.

References

1
Arah IK, Ahorbo GK, Anku EK, Kumah EK, Amaglo H (2016) Postharvest handling practices and treatment methods for tomato handlers in developing countries: A mini review. Adv Agric 2016:1-8. doi:10.1155/2016/6436945
2
Barry CS, Giovannoni JJ (2006) Ripening in the tomato Green-ripe mutant is inhibited by ectopic expression of a protein that disrupts ethylene signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:7923-7928. doi:10.1073/pnas.0602319103
3
Batu A (2004) Determination of acceptable firmness and colour values of tomatoes. J Food Eng 61:471-475. doi:10.1016/s0260-8774(03)00141-9
4
Bonfield JK, Smith KF, Staden R (1995) A new DNA sequence assembly program. Nucleic Acids Res 23:4992-4999
5
Cantu D, Blanco-Ulate B, Yang L, Labavitch JM, Bennett AB, Powell AL (2009) Ripening-regulated susceptibility of tomato fruit to Botrytis cinerea requires NOR but not RIN or ethylene. Plant Physiol 150:1434-1449. doi:10.1104/pp.109.138701
6
Davies JN, Kempton RJ (1975) Changes in the individual sugars of tomato fruit during ripening. J Sci Food Agric 26:1103–1110
7
De Ketelaere B, Lammertyn J, Molenberghs G, Desmet M, Nicolaı̈ B, De Baerdemaeker J (2004) Tomato cultivar grouping based on firmness change, shelf life and variance during postharvest storage. Postharvest Biol Technol 34:187-201. doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2004.03.007
8
Devran Z, Göknur A, Mesci L (2016) D evelopment of molecular markers for the Mi-1 gene in tomato using the KASP genotyping assay. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 57:156-160. doi:10.1007/s13580-016-0028-6
9
Eriksson EM, Bovy A, Manning K, Harrison L, Andrews J, De Silva J, Tucker GA, Seymour GB (2004) Effect of the Colorless nonripening mutation on cell wall biochemistry and gene expression during tomato fruit development and ripening. Plant Physiol 136:4184-4197. doi:10.1104/pp.104.045765
10
Giovannoni JJ (2004) Genetic regulation of fruit development and ripening. Plant Cell 16 S170-180. doi:10.1105/tpc.019158
11
Giovannoni JJ (2007) Fruit ripening mutants yield insights into ripening control. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:283-289. doi:10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.008
12
Giovannoni JJ, Noensie EN, Ruezinsky DM, Lu X, Tracy SL, Ganal MW, Martin GB, Pillen K, Alpert K, et al (1995) Molecular genetic analysis of the ripening-inhibitor and non-ripening loci of tomato. Mol Gen Genet 248:195-206
13
Hileman LC, Sundstrom JF, Litt A, Chen M, Shumba T, Irish VF (2006) Molecular and phylogenetic analyses of the MADS-box gene family in tomato. Mol Biol Evol 23:2245-2258. doi:10.1093/molbev/msl095
14
Hoering U (2012) Lost harvests – Food losses and food insecurity: extent and causes, impacts and possible solutions. FDCL-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, p 24
15
Kabelka E, Franchino B, Francis DM (2002) Two loci from Lycopersicon hirsutum LA407 confer resistance to strains of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. Phytopathology 92:504-510. doi:10.1094/PHYTO.2002.92.5.504
16
Kasso M, Bekele A (2016) Post-harvest loss and quality deterioration of horticultural crops in Dire Dawa Region, Ethiopia. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 2016. doi:10.1016/j.jssas.2016.01.005
17
Kerr EA (1958) Mutations of chlorophyll retention in ripe fruit. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 8:22
18
Kim HJ, Lee HR, Hyun JY, Hong DO, Won DC, Harn CH (2013) A SCAR marker linked to RIPENING-INHIBITOR in tomato. Korean J Breed Sci 45:104-108. doi:10.9787/kjbs.2013.45.2.104
19
Kopeliovitch E, Rabinowitch H, Mizrahi Y, Kedar N (1981) Mode of inheritance of alcobaca, a tomato ripening mutant. Euphytica 30:223–225
20
Kramer M, Sanders R, Bolkan H, Waters C, Sheeny RE, Hiatt WR (1992) Postharvest evaluation of transgenic tomatoes with reduced5214(92)90007-C
21
22
Lincoln JE, Fischer RL (1988) Regulation of gene expression by ethylene in wild-type and rin tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) fruit. Plant Physiol 88:370-374
23
Manning K, Tor M, Poole M, Hong Y, Thompson AJ, King GJ, Giovannoni JJ, Seymour GB (2006) A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat Genet 38:948-952. doi:10.1038/ng1841
24
Martel C, Vrebalov J, Tafelmeyer P, Giovannoni JJ (2011) The tomato MADS-box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR interacts with promoters involved in numerous ripening processes in a COLORLESS NONRIPENING-dependent manner. Plant Physiol 157:1568-1579. doi:10.1104/pp.111.181107
25
Ng TJ (1976). Genetic and physiological characterization of the rin and nor non-ripening mutants of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum, Mill.). PhD Diss., Purdue University, IN, USA
26
Pék Z, Helyes L (2010) Color changes and antioxidant content of vine and postharvest-ripened tomato fruits. HortScience 45:466-468
27
Perveen R, Suleria HA, Anjum FM, Butt MS, Pasha I, Ahmad S (2015) Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) carotenoids and lycopenes chemistry; Metabolism, absorption, nutrition, and allied health claims. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 55:919-929. doi:10.1080/10408398.2012.657809
28
Phan NT, Sim SC (2017) Genomic tools and their implications for vegetable breeding. Hortic Sci Technol 35:149-164. doi:10.12972/ kjhst.20170018
29
Raiola A, Rigano MM, Calafiore R, Frusciante L, Barone A (2014) Enhancing the health-promoting effects of tomato fruit for biofortified food. Mediat Inflamm 2014:139873. doi:10.1155/2014/139873
30
Robinson RW, Tomes M (1968) Ripening inhibitor: a gene with multiple effect on ripening. Rep Tomato Genet Coop 18:36–37
31
Sablani SS, Opara LU, Al-Balushi K (2006) Influence of bruising and storage temperature on vitamin C content of tomato fruit. J Food Agric Environ 4:54-56
32
Seymour GB, Chapman NH, Chew BL, Rose JK (2013) Regulation of ripening and opportunities for control in tomato and other fruits. Plant Biotechnol J 11:269-278. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7652.2012.00738.x
33
Thompson AJ, Tor M, Barry CS, Vrebalov J, Orfila C, Jarvis MC, Giovannoni JJ, Grierson D, Seymour GB (1999) Molecular and genetic characterization of a novel pleiotropic tomato-ripening mutant. Plant Physiol 120:383-389
34
Tigchelaar EC, Tomes ML, Kerr EA, Barman RJ (1973) A new fruit ripening mutant, non-ripening (nor). Rep Tomato Genet Coop 23:33
35
Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485:635-641. doi:10.1038/nature11119
36
Truong HTH, Kim S, Tran HN, Nguyen TTT, Nguyen LT, Hoang TK (2015) Development of a SCAR marker linked to bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum ) resistance in tomato line Hawaii 7996 using bulked-segregant analysis. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 56:506-515. doi:10.1007/s13580-015-1050-9
37
Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, Rozen SG (2012) Primer3-new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 40:e115. doi:10.1093/nar/gks596
38
Veerappan K, Jung HJ, Hwang I, Kho KH, Chung MY, Nou IS (2016) Sequence variation in SlMYB12 is associated with fruit peel color in pink tomato cultivars. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 57:274-279. doi:10.1007/s13580-016-0041-9
39
Vicente AR, Saladié M, Rose JKC, Labavitch JM (2007) The linkage between cell wall metabolism and fruit softening: looking to the future. J Sci Food Agric 87:1435-1448. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2837
40
Vrebalov J, Ruezinsky D, Padmanabhan V, White R, Medrano D, Drake R, Schuch W, Giovannoni J (2002) A MADS-Box gene necessary for fruit ripening at the tomato Ripening-Inhibitor (Rin) locus. Science 296:343-346. doi:10.1126/science.1068181
41
Wang W, Cai J, Wang P, Tian S, Qin G (2017) Post-transcriptional regulation of fruit ripening and disease resistance in tomato by the vacuolar protease SlVPE3. Genome Biol 18:47. doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1178-2
42
Yuan XY, Wang RH, Zhao XD, Luo YB, Fu DQ (2016) Role of the tomato Non-ripening mutation in regulating rruit quality elucidated using iTRAQ protein profile analysis. PLoS ONE 11:e0164335. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164335
43
Zapata PJ, Guillén F, Martínez-Romero D, Castillo S, Valero D, Serrano M (2008) Use of alginate or zein as edible coatings to delay postharvest ripening process and to maintain tomato (Solanum lycopersicon Mill) quality. J Sci Food Agric 88:1287-1293.doi:10.1002/jsfa.3220
페이지 상단으로 이동하기