Research Article

Horticultural Science and Technology. June 2018. 406-416
https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20180040

ABSTRACT


MAIN

  • Introduction

  • Materials and Methods

  •   Plant Materials and Cultivation Conditions

  •   Sample Preparation and Analysis of GSLs

  •   Authentic Standards and Chemicals

  • Results and Discussion

  •   Climatic Conditions of the Cultivation Field

  •   Yearly Variations in GSL Profiles and Content

Introduction

Glucosinolates (GSLs) are sulfur-containing secondary metabolites naturally found in Brassica vegetables, which include the thioglycoside group (Ciska et al., 2000). GSLs possess anticancer, antibacterial, antimutagenic, and antioxidative properties (Nakamura et al., 2001; Ippoushi et al., 2007).

They are responsible for the hot and pungent flavor of the plants that contain them (Fahey et al., 2001), and can also be used as pesticides and to control diseases. GSLs are generally not active by themselves, but rather show their unique activity when degraded and metabolized (Fenwick et al., 1983; Getahan and Chung, 1999). More than 200 GSLs have been reported from different Brassica crops (Halkier and Gershenzon, 2006). They are classified as aliphatic GSLs derived from methionine, aromatic GSLs derived from phenylalanine, and indolyic GSLs derived from tryptophan (Fahey et al., 2001; Clarke, 2010), depending on the type of amino acid used as a precursor. Each GSL is hydrolyzed by an enzyme called myrosinase to form isothiocyanates, thiocynates, or nitriles depending on the nature of the GSL. Each hydrolysis product exhibits various biological activities, which can benefit the health of animals and humans. Sulforaphane (1-isothiocyanato-4- methylsulphinyl-butane), a degradation product of glucoraphanin, has been identified as the most potent substance present in Brassica vegetables (Sarikamis et al., 2006). It is also known that indole-3-carbinol (I3C) and 3,3'-diindolylemethane (DIM), which are degradation products of glucobrassicin, show various anticancer activities (Bonnesen et al., 2001; Nachshon-Kedmi et al., 2004). In addition, Brassica vegetables have high antioxidative properties due to the presence of considerable amounts of various flavonoids and polyphenols, and they are gaining attention as functional foods (Cheigh and Park, 1994).

Among the green Brassica vegetables cultivated globally, broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) is one of the most commonly consumed. It is highly nutritious and contains a wide range of health-promoting phytochemicals such as GSLs, vitamins, phenols, flavonoids, selenium, glutathione, and carotenoids (Sok et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2012; Bhandari and Kwak, 2015). Broccoli shows different beneficial health properties, such as anti-obesity and cholesterol-lowering effects (Lee et al., 2009), anti-inflammatory effects (Jang and Ha, 2012), anti-oxidative effects (Kim et al., 2001), and inhibition of the development of prostate (Joseph et al., 2004) and lung cancer (Spitz et al., 2000).

Environmental variation in the GSL content of Brassica vegetables, such as turnip (Ciska et al., 2000), radish (Ciska et al., 2000), rapeseed (Rosa et al., 1996), mustard (Sarwar and Kirkegaard, 1998), Chinese cabbage (Cartea et al., 2008), and broccoli (Wang et al., 2012; Jo et al., 2016) has been extensively reported, although most studies have focused on consumer health rather than plant properties (Bjorkman et al., 2011). Bjorkman et al. (2011) found that the total GSL content was elevated under moderate temperatures, high light intensities, long days, and dry conditions in spring. The authors also showed that the total GSL content was decreased under low temperatures, low light intensities, shorter days in winter. However, Rosa and Rodrigues (2001) reported that the individual and total GSL content of broccoli was higher in winter than in spring. Furthermore, Schonhof et al. (2007a) reported that the alkyl glucosinolate levels in broccoli inflorescences increased by about five to eight times at low temperatures between 7-13°C.

Several studies have been performed to understand the differences in GSL profiles and content in broccoli, including the effects of genotypic differences (Wang et al., 2012; Jo et al., 2016), developmental stages of different tissues (Perez-Balibrea et al., 2011; Lopez-Cervantes et al., 2013; Bhandari et al., 2015), growing seasons (Vallejo et al., 2003; Bhandari and Kwak, 2014), fertilization (Fabek et al., 2012), temperature (Pek et al., 2012), postharvest storage (Fernandez-Leon et al., 2013), and controlled environments (Charron and Sams, 2004). However, most studies have been limited to the effects of environmental factors on total GSL content and GSL profiles of genetic resources. Furthermore, a large global market has formed for broccoli due to the efficacy of GSLs, such that many agricultural companies are interested in cultivating high-functioning broccoli. For example, the high-functioning broccoli variety Beneforte, also known as Super Broccoli, which possesses a higher level of GSLs, was bred in the UK by Mithen (2013). However, there are limited studies on the variation of individual and total GSL content in breeding lines for high-functioning broccoli breeding, even when grown under stable environmental conditions. Therefore, this study was conducted to select superior breeding materials for the commercial cultivation of GSL-rich broccoli. To investigate the effect of yearly changes on the environmental condition on the GSL content of broccoli breeding lines, nine commercially available varieties, 16 F1 hybrids, and 17 inbred lines were grown in an open field for two years and analyzed.

Material and Methods

Plant Materials and Cultivation Conditions

Nine commercial varieties (SK3-085, Very Dome, Ace Dome, Woosu, Neahanwoosu, Yeomsu, Kanghan, Engmu, and Super Grace), 16 F1 hybrids, and 17 inbred lines of broccoli were used in this study. Seeds were obtained from different companies. The SK3-085, Woosu, Neahanwoosu, and Yeomsu seeds were obtained from Sakata Co. (Yokohama, Japan); Very Dome and Ace Dome seeds were obtained from Takii Co. (Kyoto, Japan); Kanghan and Engmu seeds were obtained from Koregon Co. (Seoul, Korea) as domestic cultivar of China; and Super Grace seeds were obtained from Taewoo Co. (Seoul, Korea). The seeds of the F1 hybrids and inbred lines were kindly provided by the Breeding Research Institute, Koregon Co., Ltd (Gimje, Korea). The seeds were sown on July 15, 2014 and July 21, 2015, and the seedlings were transplanted into the experimental field at 30 days after sowing in both years. The seedlings were grown in a greenhouse located at the Koregon Breeding Research Institute, Gimje (35°40.9’N 126°11.8’E). The climatic factors in both years were also recorded (Fig. 1). Irrigation was applied as necessary. All broccoli genotypes were harvested at their commercial stages. The inflorescences of five broccoli plants for each line were collected, sequentially freeze-dried, ground into a fine powder, and stored at -20°C for GSL analysis.

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2018-036-03/N0130360310/images/Figure_HST_36_03_09_F1.jpg

Fig. 1. Changes in air temperature, air humidity, and cumulative radiation in cultivated area in 2014 (A, C) and 2015 (B, D). Each dotted line represents the average values.

Sample Preparation and Analysis of GSLs

Samples for GSL analyses were prepared according to the method described by Lee et al. (2013). The freeze-dried powder sample (100 mg) and 70% methanol (1 mL) were added to a 2 mL tube, extracted at 70°C for 1 h and centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C. After centrifugation, the supernatant was transferred to a new tube, and the pellet was re-extracted using the same procedure. The whole supernatant was collected, and the desulfo-GSLs were prepared for quantitative determination. For this, the supernatant was loaded onto a mini Bio-spin chromatography column (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California) packed with 0.5 mL diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-Sephadex A25 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) slurry, which was preactivated with 0.1 M sodium acetate (pH 4.0) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). The desulfation was performed using 200 µL purified aryl sulphatase (EC 3.1.6.1, type H-1 from Helix pomatia). The column was capped and left for 18 h at room temperature. The desulfo-GSLs were eluted three times with 0.5 mL of distilled water and filtered using a 0.2 µm PTFE syringe filter. A 10 µL sample was then analyzed using an Agilent 1200 High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) equipped with a photo diode array detector set at 229 nm, according to the method described by Bhandari et al. (2015). An Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column (1.7 µm, 2.1 × 100 mm; Waters Co., Milford, MA, USA) was used to separate the GSL peaks with a gradient elution of solvent A (100% distilled water) and solvent B (20% acetonitrile in water) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL·min-1. The gradient program was as follows: a linear step from 1-99% solvent B within 6 min, followed by a constant condition up to 14 min, and a rapid drop to 1% solvent B up to 15 min, and then isocratic conditioning of 1% solvent B up to 25 min. Pure commercial GLS standards were desulfated as in the sample preparation process, and used for the identification and quantification of individual GSL peaks, measuring the area and concentration of each peak separated by HPLC.

Authentic Standards and Chemicals

Eleven GSL standards, namely glucoiberin (IBE), progoitrin (PRO), epiprogoitrin (EPI), glucoraphanin (GRA), glucoraphenin (GRE), sinigrin (SIN), gluconapin (NAP), glucobrassicanapin (BCN), glucoerucin (ERU), glucobrassicin (BRA), and glucobarbarin (BAR) were obtained from Cfm Oskar Tropitzsch (Marktredwitz, Germany). Diethyl aminoethyl (DEAE)-Sephadex A25, and aryl sulfatase (EC 3.1.6.1, type H-1) from H. pomatia were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Acetonitrile (HPLC grade) and methanol (HPLC grade) were purchased from Avantor Performance Materials (Center Valley, PA, USA).

Results and Discussion

Climatic Conditions of the Cultivation Field

The climatic conditions of the cultivation field during the two years are presented in Fig. 1. The average temperature, relative humidity, and cumulative light intensity from August 1 to November 31, 2014, were 15.7°C, 72.0%, and 12.4 MJ·m-2, respectively. All three of these parameters were relatively lower in 2014 than in 2015; the average temperature, relative humidity and cumulative light intensity from September 1 to November 31, 2015, were 16.2°C, 76.7%, and 14.0 MJ·m-2, respectively (Fig. 1) (KMA, 2014, 2015). Additionally, the number of precipitation days during the cultivation period of broccoli in 2014 and 2015 was 25 and 36, respectively (data not shown). Therefore, the average relative humidity was likely higher in 2015. There were no significant differences in the average temperature and average relative humidity between 2014 and 2015, and the cumulative light intensity was higher in 2015 than in 2014 (KMA, 2014 & 2015).

Yearly Variations in GSL Profiles and Content

In total, eight desulfo-GSLs, namely IBE, PRO, EPI, SIN, GRA, ERU, NAP, and BRA were detected in the broccoli genotypes grown in 2014 and 2015 using 11 commercial standards. Among them, there were one indolyl GSL (BRA) and seven aliphatic GSLs. The GSL content and profiles were dependent on the genotype in both years and varied significantly in most cases. According to previous research, the concentrations and profiles of the GSLs not only depended on the genotypes but also on the plant part sampled and on the sampling method. Lee et al. (2012) identified six of the nine GSLs analyzed in broccoli, and Bhandari et al. (2015) reported seven GSLs in seeds, eight in sprouts, eight in shoots, and eight in roots, using 12 kinds of GSL standard materials. Thus, GSLs composition and content can vary depending on the growth stage and sample site. Similarly, genotype-dependent variation in GSL profiles and content were also observed by Wang et al. (2012) and Jo et al. (2016), who analyzed 148 and 39 broccoli genotypes, respectively. The individual GSL content found in the present study was within the range of these previous reports (Wang et al., 2012; Jo et al., 2016), which used a large number of genotypes for their studies. The major GSLs in both 2014 and 2015 were GRA, ERU, NAP, and BRA, which differed significantly between the growing years, but the pattern of GSL content among the genotypes showed a similar trend (Figs. 2 and 3). The differences in GLS content were caused by differences in several climatic factors such as temperature, rainfall, and humidity, as such variation was also reported in previous studies (Rosa et al., 1996; Charron and Shams, 2004; Cartea et al., 2008).

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2018-036-03/N0130360310/images/Figure_HST_36_03_09_F2.jpg

Fig. 2. Indole GSL contents in floret part of 42 broccoli breeding lines cultivated in 2014 (vertical bar) and 2015 (vertical dot line). Each vertical bar represents mean ± SD of three replications.

BRA, which belongs to the indole group and has robust anticancer properties (Nachshon-Kedmi et al., 2004), showed the highest levels among the GSLs tested in almost all broccoli genotypes in both 2014 (4.34 µmol·g-1 DW) and 2015 (5.24 µmol·g-1 DW). GRA showed the second highest levels in both 2014 and 2015 (Fig. 2). These results were similar to those of Jo et al. (2016) and Jeffery et al. (2003), who found BRA to be the most dominant GSL in different genotypes of broccoli. However, the current results differed from those of Rosa and Rodrigues (2001) and Lee et al. (2012), who found GRA to be the most dominant GSL. Such differential dominance of GSLs in broccoli heads might be due to variation in growing conditions and genotypes (Jeffery et al., 2003; Meyer and Adam, 2008; Wang et al., 2012; Bhandari and Kwak, 2014).

The content of BRA ranged from 0.86-10.76 µmol·g-1 DWand 1.43-10.67 µmol·g-1 DW in 2014 and 2015, respectively. Genotypes 5402 (10.76 µmol·g-1 DW) grown in 2014 and 5405 (10.67 µmol·g1 DW) grown in 2015 exhibited the highest BRA content compared to other genotypes. The maximum content was similar in both years, but the minimum content was 0.67 times higher in broccoli grown in 2015 than in 2014, Furthermore, the average content was also 0.20 times higher in 2015 than in 2014 (Fig. 2). This difference probably results from differences in light intensity; the average light intensity was higher in 2015 than in 2014, but the light intensity from October to November, the period when inflorescences are formed, was lower in 2015. The lower light intensity in 2015 was due to a higher number of precipitation days in 2015 than in 2014. Thus, the higher BRA content in 2015 might have been more significant in more genotypes if not for the increased precipitation in October (Fig. 1), as light intensity also affects the synthesis of BRA and other GSLs (Schonhof et al., 2007a). However, the difference in BRA content between the two years was significant/non-significant depending upon the genotype. In total, five F1 hybrids, A311, 5022, 5036, 5075, and 5078 and three inbred lines, 5401, 5402, and 5409 exhibited similar BRA content in both years.

Among the seven aliphatic GSLs, GRA and ERU were most commonly found in both growing years in almost all cultivars (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the average content of GRA was the highest among the analyzed aliphatic-GSLs in both growing years (Fig. 3D). This result was similar to those reported by Jo et al. (2016), who found an average of 1.97 µmol·g-1 DW of GRA in 39 broccoli genotypes. Almost all genotypes showed a higher GRA content in 2014 than in 2015; this result might be due to the difference in temperature conditions between the two years. Steindal et al. (2013) indicated that GRA content is affected by temperature, and Schonhof et al. (2007a) found that GRA levels, including IBE in broccoli, were lower under higher temperature. In addition, studies have shown that higher concentrations of atmospheric CO2 increased the levels of GRA and IBE (Schonhof et al., 2007b). Therefore, it is possible that the levels of individual GSLs in the present study were also influenced by environmental factors, especially temperature, humidity, and rainfall. Thus, further testing of environmental factors is necessary to understand the actual effect of each environmental parameter on GSL content in broccoli genotypes.

The average GRA content was slightly lower in broccoli grown in 2015 than in 2014 in most genotypes. However, the F1 hybrids A311, 5021, 5035, 5093, and 5099 as well as inbred lines 5303, 5304, 5308, 5311, 5312, 5404, 5405, 5406, and 5409 showed similar GRA content in both years. In 2014, four genotypes, namely 5075, 5078, 5079, and 5308 (4.05-6.42 µmol·g-1 DW) exhibited relatively higher GRA content than the commercial cultivars and F1 hybrids. Similarly, genotypes 5078, 5079, 5308, and 5309 (4.10-4.97 µmol·g-1 DW) exhibited comparatively higher GRA content in 2014 (Fig. 3D). Overall, genotypes 5079 (6.42 µmol·g-1 DW) and 5309 (4.97 µmol·g-1 DW) showed the highest GRA content in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The level of GRA among different genotypes varied from 0.19-6.42 µmol·g-1 DW and 0.06-4.97 µmol·g-1 DW in 2014 and 2015, respectively.

ERU, the second most abundant aliphatic GSL, was also present in higher quantities in 2014 than in 2015 in most genotypes; its content varied from 0.02-0.58 µmol·g-1 DW and 0.01-0.39 µmol·g-1 DW in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The highest content of ERU was found in F1 hybrids 5035 and A302 in 2014 and 2015, respectively (Fig. 3E). The content of ERU was lower than that of GRA; these results are in agreement to those of Steindal et al. (2013). The genotypes A302, 5035, 5075, and 5078 exhibited higher ERU content than GRA content in both 2014 and 2015. The pattern of NAP content was genotype-dependent in both years. Eighteen genotypes did not contain any NAP in 2014, but contained a considerable amount in 2015 (Fig. 3F). F1 hybrid 5075 showed the highest GNP content in both 2014 (0.99 µmol·g -1 DW) and 2015 (0.88 µmol·g -1 DW). Among the other GSLs, the content of IBE was lower, and a similar trend was observed in both years. Only four inbred line genotypes, 5303, 5304, 5306, and 5312 contained IBE, and the highest content was observed in 5312 in both years (Fig. 3A). PRO and EPI were also detected in almost all genotypes in both years, and a relatively higher content was observed in 2014 compared to 2015 (Fig. 3B). Only three F1 hybrids (A302, 5305, and 5302) and one inbred line (5408) exhibited relatively higher content of PRO and EPI than the commercial cultivars. High PRO and EPI content in Brassica is not preferable from a consumer’s point of view, as these GSLs are responsible for a bitter taste (Fahey et al., 2001; Baik et al., 2003). Hence, genotypes that possess either low levels of PRO and EPI, or do not possess these GSLs at all, have a higher consumer demand. Furthermore, SIN was also detected at levels that were genotype-dependent in both growing years. The breakdown products of SIN are also bitter or astringent (Drewnowski and Gomez-Carneros, 2000). The genotypes in which SIN was detected in 2014 exhibited a lower level in 2015, while the other genotypes showed trace levels of SIN in 2015. Overall, most of the genotypes exhibited aliphatic GSLs at lower levels in 2015 compared to 2014. The higher aliphatic GSL content in some genotypes in 2014 was probably due to the lower average temperature in that year, as temperature plays an important role in the accumulation of phytochemicals in broccoli (Vallejo et al., 2003).

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2018-036-03/N0130360310/images/Figure_HST_36_03_09_F3.jpg

Fig. 3. Major aliphatic GSL contents (A: IBE, B: PRO+EPI, C: SIN, D: GRA, E: ERU, F: NAP) in floret part of 42 broccoli breeding lines which were cultivated in both 2014 (vertical bar) and 2015 (vertical dot line). Each vertical bar represents mean ± SD of three replications.

Total GSL content was also affected by the growing year, and the average level of GSL was slightly higher in broccoli grown in 2015 than in 2014 (2014: 7.66 µmol·g-1 DW; 2015; 8.18 µmol·g-1 DW) in most of the genotypes, but the difference was not significant (Fig. 4). The total GSL content was highest in genotype 5402 in both years (2014: 16.99 µmol·g-1 DW; 2015: 14.20 µmol·g-1 DW). Genotype 5309 (3.32 µmol·g1 DW) showed the lowest GSL content in 2014, but this value increased approximately 3.2 fold (10.69 µmol·g-1 DW) in 2015 (Fig. 4). After comparing individual GSL contents in 2014 and 2015, we selected the three genotypes with the highest GRA contents: 5078, 5079, and 5308 (2014: 6.19, 6.42, and 4.49 µmol·g-1 DW; 2015: 4.15, 4.10, and 4.58 µmol·g-1 DW, respectively), and the two genotypes with the highest BRA contents: 5402 and 5409 (2014: 10.76 and 10.43 µmol·g-1 DW; 2015: 9.80 and 10.19 µmol·g-1 DW, respectively). In addition, individual GSLs such as IBE, NAP, and ERU were found at low levels in broccoli, and our annual analysis showed that this is the case in a number of genotypes. Furthermore, genotypes that exhibited high GSL contents in both 2014 and 2015 were identified. Finally, the four genotypes 5078, 5079, 5308, and 5409, which had high levels of GRA and BRA, low levels of PRO and EPI, and stable content over the two years were selected. These selected lines may promising as functional broccoli breeding materials in the future (Table 1).

http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2018-036-03/N0130360310/images/Figure_HST_36_03_09_F4.jpg

Fig. 4. Total GSL content in floret parts of 42 broccoli breeding lines cultivated in 2014 (A) and 2015 (B). Each circle represents the ratio of three major GSL types in commercial cultivars, F1 hybrids, and inbred lines, respectively. Values are average of three replications.

Table 1. Individual and total GSL contents in floral parts of selected breeding lines cultivated in 2014 and 2015 http://static.apub.kr/journalsite/sites/kshs/2018-036-03/N0130360310/images/Table_HST_36_03_10_T1.jpg

zValues are mean ± SD of three replications.

yCoefficient of variation.

In conclusion, this study summarizes the variation in individual GSLs as well as total GSL content among a number of broccoli breeding lines grown over two years. BRA was the most dominant GSL, followed by GRA, regardless of genotype or growing year. Only four genotypes, two F1 hybrids (5078 and 5079) and two inbred lines (5308 and 5409), exhibited either a high GRA or BRA content in both growing years with varied climatic conditions; these lines could be used as a genetic resource for commercialization in the future.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the New Scientist Support Project of the Rural Development Administration, Korea (Project No. PJ012300).

References

1
Baik HY, Juvik JA, Jeffery EH, Wallig MA, Kushad M, Klein BP (2003) Relating glucosinolate content and flavor of broccoli cultivars. J Food Sci 68:1043-1050. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb08285.x
2
Bhandari SR, Kwak JH (2014) Seasonal variation in phytochemicals and antioxidant activities in different tissues of various broccoli cultivars. Afr J Biotechnol 13:604-615. doi:10.5897/AJB2013.13432
3
Bhandari SR, Kwak JH (2015) Chemical composition and antioxidant activity in different tissues of Brassica vegetables. Molecules 20:1228-1243. doi:10.3390/molecules20011228
4
Bhandari SR, Jo JS, Lee JG (2015) Comparison of glucosinolate profiles in different tissues of nine Brassica crops. Molecules 20:15827-15841. doi:10.3390/molecules200915827
5
Bonnesen C, Eggleston IM, Hayes JD (2001) Dietary indoles and isothiocyanates that are generated from cruciferous vegetables can both stimulate apoptosis and confer protection against DNA damage in human colon cell lines. Cancer Res 61:6120-6130
6
Bjorkman M, Klingen I, Birch AN, Bones AM, Bruce TJ, Johansen TJ, Meadow R, Molmann J, Seljasen R, et al (2011) Phytochemicals of Brassicaceae in plant protection and human health - influences of climate, environment and agronomic practice. Phytochemistry 72:538-556. doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.014
7
Cartea ME, Velasco P, Obregon S, Padilla G, de Haro A (2008) Seasonal variation in glucosinolate content in Brassica oleracea crops grown in northwestern Spain. Phytochemistry 69:403-410. doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.08.014
8
Charron CS, Sams CE (2004) Glucosinolate content and myrosinase activity in rapid-cycling Brassica oleracea grown in a controlled environment. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 129:321-330
9
Ciska E, Martyniak-Przybyszewska B, Kozlowska H (2000) Content of glucosinolates in cruciferous vegetables grown at the same site for two years under different climatic conditions. J Agric Food Chem 48:2862-2867. doi:10.1021/jf981373a
10
Clarke DB (2010) Glucosinolates, structures and analysis in food. Anal Methods 2:310-325. doi:10.1039/B9AY00280D
11
Cheigh, HS, Park KY (1994) Biochemical, microbiological, and nutritional aspects of kimchi (Korean fermented vegetable products). Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 34:175-203. doi:10.1080/104083994 09527656
12
Drewnowski A, Gomez-Carneros C (2000) Bitter taste, phytonutrients, and the consumer: a review. Am J Clin Nutr 72:1424-1435
13
Fabek S, Toth N, Redovnikovic IR, Custic MH, Benko B, Zutic I (2012) The effects of nitrogen fertilization on nitrate accumulation, and the content of minerals and glucosinolates in broccoli cultivars. Food Technol Biotechnol 50:183-191
14
Fahey JW, Zalcmann AT, Talalay P (2001) The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 56:5-51. doi:10.1016/S0031-9422(00)00316-2
15
Fenwick GR, Griffiths NM, Heaney RK (1983) Bitterness in Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea L. var. gemmifera): the role of 126 glucosinolates and their breakdown products. J Sci Food Agric 34:73-80. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2740340111
16
Fernandez-Leon MF, Fernandez-Leon AM, Lozano M, Ayuso MC, Gonzalez-Gomez D (2013) Different postharvest strategies to preserve broccoli quality during storage and shelf life: controlled atmosphere and 1-MCP. Food Chem 138:564-573. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem. 2012.09.143
17
Getahan SM, Chung FL (1999) Conversion of glucosinolates to isothiocyanates in humans after ingestion of cooked watercress. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:447-451
18
Halkier BA, Gershenzon J (2006) Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:303-338. doi:10.1146/annurev. arplant.57.032905.105228
19
Ippoushi K, Takeuch A, Ito H, Hori H, Azuma K (2007) Antioxidative effects of daikon sprout (Raphanus sativus L.) and ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) in rats. Food Chem 102:237-242. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.04.046
20
Jang MW, Ha BJ (2012) Effects of broccoli on anti-inflammation and anti-oxidation according to extraction solvents. J Food Hyg Saf 27:461-465. doi:10.13103/JFHS.2012.27.4.461
21
Jeffery EH, Brown AF, Kurilich AC, Keck AS, Matusheski N, Klein BP, Juvik JA (2003) Variation in content of bioactive components in broccoli. J Food Compos Anal 16:323-330. doi:10.1016/S0889-1575(03)00045-0
22
Joseph MA, Moysich KB, Freudenheim JL, Shields PG, Bowman ED, Zhang Y, Marshall JR, Ambrosone CB (2004) Cruciferous vegetables, genetic polymorphisms in glutathione s-transferases m1 and t1, and prostate cancer risk. Nutr Cancer 50:206-213. doi:10.1207/ s15327914nc5002_11
23
Jo JS, Bhandari SR, Kang GH, Lee JG (2016) Comparative analysis of individual glucosinolates, phytochemicals, and antioxidant activities in broccoli breeding lines. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 57:392-403. doi:10.1007/s13580-016-0088-7
24
KMA (Korea Meteorological Administration) (2014, 2015) https://data.kma.go.kr/data/grnd/ selectAsosRltmList.do?pgmNo=36
25
Kim SM, Cho YS, Sung SK (2001) The antioxidant ability and nitrite scavenging ability of plant extracts. Korean J Food Sci Technol 33:626-632
26
Lee JG, Bonnema G, Zhang N, Kwak JH, de Vos RCH, Beekwilder J (2013) Evaluation of glucosinolate variation in a collection of turnip (Brassica rapa) germplasm by the analysis of intact and desulfo glucosinolates. J Agric Food Chem 61:3984-3993. doi:10.1021/ jf400890p
27
Lee JG, Kwak JH, Um YC, Lee SG, Jang YA, Choi CS (2012) Variation of glucosinolate contents among domestic broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. Italica) accessions. Korean J Hortic Sci Technol 30:743-750. doi:10.7235/hort.2012.12124
28
Lee JJ, Shin HD, Lee YM, Kim AR, Lee MY (2009) Effect of broccoli sprouts on cholesterol-lowering and anti-obesity effects in rats fed high fat diet. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 38:309-318. doi:10.3746/jkfn.2009.38.3.309
29
Lopez-Cervantes J, Tirado-Noriega LG, Sanchez-Machado DI, Campas-Baypoli ON, Cantu-Soto EU, Nunez-Gastelum JA (2013) Biochemical composition of broccoli seeds and sprouts at different stages of seedling development. Int J Food Sci Technol 48:2267-2275. doi:10.1111/ijfs.12213
30
Meyer M, Adam ST (2008) Comparison of glucosinolate levels in commercial broccoli and red cabbage from conventional and ecological farming. Eur Food Res Technol 226:1429-1437. doi:10.1007/s00217-007-0674-0
31
Mithen RF (2013) Development and commercialization of ‘Beneforte’ Broccoli and potential health benefits. Acta Hortic 1005:67-70. doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.1005.4
32
Nakamura Y, Iwahashi T, Tanaka A, Koutani J, Matuso T, Okamoto S (2001) 4-(methylthio)-3-buenyl isothiocyanate, a principal antimutagen in daikon (Raphanus sativus L.: Japanese white radish). J Agric Food Chem 49:5755-5760. doi:10.1021/jf0108415
33
Nachshon-Kedmi M, Fares FA, Yannai S (2004) Therapeutic activity of 3,3’-diindolylmethane on prostate cancer in an in vivo model. Prostate 61:153-160. doi:10.1002/pros.20092
34
Pek Z, Daood H, Nagyne MG, Berki M, Tothne MM, Nemenyi A, Helyes L (2012) Yield and phytochemical compounds of broccoli as affected by temperature, irrigation, and foliar sulfur supplementation. HortScience 47:1646-1652
35
Perez-Balibrea S, Moreno DA, Garcia-Viguera C (2011) Genotypic effects on the phytochemical quality of seeds and sprouts from commercial broccoli cultivars. Food Chem 125:348-354. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.09.004
36
Rosa EAS, Heaney RK, Portas CAM, Fenwick GR (1996) Changes in glucosinolate concentrations in Brassica crops (B. oleracea and B. napus) throughout growing seasons. J Sci Food Agric 71:237-244. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199606)71:2<237::AID-JSFA574>3.0. CO;2-P
37
Rosa E, Rodrigues AS (2001) Total and individual glucosinolate content in 11 broccoli cultivars grown in early and late seasons. HortScience 36:56-59
38
Sarwar M, Kirkegaard JA (1998) Biofumigation potential of brassicas. II: Effect of environment and ontogeny on glucosinolate production and implications for screening. Plant Soil 201:91-101. doi:10.1023/A:1004364713152
39
Sok DE, Kim JH, Kim MR (2003) Isolation and identification of bioactive organosulfur phytochemicals from solvent extract of broccoli. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 32:315-319. doi:10.3746/jkfn.2003.32.3.315
40
Spitz MR, Duphorne CM, Detry MA, Pillow PC, Amos CI, Lei L, de Andrade M, Gu XJ, Hong WK, et al (2000) Dietary intake of isothiocyanates: evidence of a joint effect with glutathione S-transferase polymorphisms in lung cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9:1017-1020
41
Sarikamis, G, Marquez J, MacCormack R, Bennett RN, Roberts J, Mithen R (2006) High glucosinolate broccoli: a delivery system for sulforaphane. Mol Breed 18:219-228. doi:10.1007/s11032-006-9029-y
42
Schonhof, I, Kläring HP, Krumbein A, Claußen W, Schreiner M (2007a) Effect of temperature increase under low radiation conditions on phytochemicals and ascorbic acid in greenhouse grown broccoli. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119:103-111. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2006. 06.018
43
Schonhof I, Kläring HP, Krumbein A, Schreiner M (2007b) Interaction between atmospheric CO2 and glucosinolates in broccoli. J Chem Ecol 33:105-114. doi:10.1007/s10886-006-9202-0
44
Steindal ALH, Mølmann J, Bengtsson GB (2013) Influence of day length and temperature on the content of health-related compounds in broccoli (Brassica oleracea L. var. italica). J Agric Food Chem 61:10779-10786. doi:10.1021/jf403466r
45
Vallejo F, Tomas-Barberan FA, Garcia-Viguera C (2003) Effect of climatic and sulphur fertilization conditions, on phenolic compounds and vitamin C, in the inflorescences of eight broccoli cultivars. Eur Food Res Technol 216:395-401. doi:10.1007/s00217-003-0664-9
46
Wang J, Gu H, Yu H, Zhao Z, Sheng X, Zhang X (2012) Genotypic variation of glucosinolates in broccoli (Brassica oleracea var. italica) florets from China. Food Chem 133:735-741. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.01.085
페이지 상단으로 이동하기