All Issue

2016 Vol.34, Issue 5 Preview Page
Variation in Fruit Characteristics of 3x Progenies Obtained from a Cross between 4x and 2x Grape Cultivars

4배체와 2배체 포도 품종간 교배를 통해서 생성된 3배체 후대개체에서 과실특성의 변이

Jae-Yun Heo1,2
,
Sung-Min Park2*
허 재윤1,2
,
박 성민2*
Agriculture and Life Sciences Research Institute, Kangwon National University
2Department of Horticulture, Kangwon National University
강원대학교 농업생명과학연구원
2강원대학교 원예학과
*교신저자. *Corresponding Author. 
31 October 2016. pp. 761-770
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

This study investigated the variation in fruit characteristics between different triploid progenies derived from a cross between tetraploid and diploid grape cultivars, with the aim of developing high quality, labor-saving triploid grapes. No differences were found in fruit quality traits such as soluble solids content and titratable acidity, whereas significant variation was noted in cluster weight induced by a one-time application of GA3 (100 ppm) on the triploid progeny of different cross combinations. The cluster weight was higher in progeny obtained from ‘Kyoho’ × ‘Sekirei’ than for offspring derived from other cross combinations; deviation in the mean cluster weight was also small for ‘Kyoho’ × ‘Sekirei’ progeny. These results suggest that specific cross combinations, such as ‘Kyoho’ × ‘Sekirei’, can be used to efficiently breed new, labor-saving seedless grape cultivars.

Keywords
fruit quality
gibberellin
pollen fertility
seedless grape

본 연구는 고품질을 가진 노동절감형 3배체 포도의 효율적인 육성 가능성을 검토하기 위해서, 4배체와 2배체의 교배를 통해서 얻어진 3배체 포도계통들에서 과실 특성의 변이 를 교배조합별로 검정하였다. 비록 가용성 고형물 함량과 적정산도와 같은 과실의 품질과 관련 된 형질들은 교배조합들 사이에서 유의미한 차이가 관찰되지 않았지만, GA3 1회 처리에 따른 과실의 비대 정도는 교배조합에 따른 변이가 크게 나타났다. 특히, ‘거봉’과 ‘적령’의 교배 조합에서 생성된 3배체 후대계통에서의 평균 과방중은 491g으로써 다른 교배조합에서 생성된 후대계통들에 비해서 유의적으로 컸으며, 동일한 교배조합 내의 계통간에서의 차이도 크지 않았다. 이러한 연구결과는 ‘거봉’과 ‘적령’ 같은 특정한 교배 조합이 고품질을 가진 노동력 절감형 대립계 무핵포도를 육성하는데 있어서 효율적으로 이용될 수 있음을 시사하고 있다.

키워드
과실품질
지벨렐린
화분임성
무핵포도
References
1
Amerine MA, Berg HW, Cruess WV (1979) The composition of grapes. In The Technology of Wine Making, Ed 4, The AVI Publishing Company, CT, USA, pp 77-139
2
Ben-Tal Y (1990) Effect of gibberellin treatments on ripening and berry drop from Thompson Seedless grapes. Am J Enol Viticul 41:142-146
3
Brown AG, Harvey DM (1971) Nature and inheritance of sweetness and acidity in cultivated apple. Euphytica 20:68-80
4
Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM (2002) Understanding American and Chinese consumer acceptance of ‘Redglobe’ table grapes. Postharvest Biol Technol 24:155-162
5
Crisosto CH, Crisosto GM, Metheney P (2003) Consumer acceptance of ‘Brooks’ and ‘Bing’ cherries is mainly dependent on fruit SSC and visual color. Postharvest Biol Technol 28:159-167
6
Gorini F, Lasorella M (1990) Sensory and objective evaluation of kiwifruit. Acta Hortic 282:309-314
7
Gray DJ, Mortensen JA, Benton CM, Durham RE, Moore GA (1990) Ovule culture to obtain progeny from hybrid seedless bunch grapes. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 115:1019-1024
8
Heo JY, Park KS, Yun HK, Park SM (2007) Degree of abortion and germination percentage in seeds derived from interploid crosses between diploid and tetraploid grape cultivars. Hortic Environ Biotechnol 48:115-121
9
Heo JY, Park SM (2015) Breeding of a new triploid seedless table grape cultivar ‘Paradise’. J Am Pomol Soc 69:170-172
10
Hrazdina G, Parsons GF, Mattick LR (1984) Physiological and biochemical events during development and maturation of grape berries. Am J Enol Vitic 35:220-227
11
Kanellis AK, Roubelakis-Angelakis KA (1993) Grape. In GB Seymour, JE Taylor, GA Tucker, eds, Biochemistry of fruit ripening, Chapman & Hall, London, UK, pp 189-220. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1584-1_6
12
Kim WS, Chung SJ (2000) Effect of GA3, ethephon, girdling and wiring treatment on the berry enlargement and maturity of ‘Himrod’ Grape. J Kor Soc Hort Sci 41:75-77
13
Kliewer WM, Howarth L, Omori M (1967) Concentrations of tartaric acid and malic acids and their salts in Vitis vinifera grapes. Am J Enol Vitic 18:42-54
14
Lasaszloo JC, Saayman D (1990) Optimum harvesting stage for Sultanina as table grape. Decid Fruit Grow 40:101-105 Lavee S, Nir G (1986) Grape. In SP Monselise, ed, Handbook of fruit set and development, CRC Press, FL, USA, pp 167-183
15
Liang ZC, Sang M, Ma AH, Zhao SJ, Zhong GY, Li SH (2011) Inheritance of sugar and acid contents in the ripe berries of a tetraploid diploid grape cross population. Euphytica 182:251-259. doi:10.1007/s10681-011-0487-x
16
Liu HF, Wu BH, Fan PG, Li SH, Li LS (2006) Sugar and acid concentration in 98 grape cultivars analysed by principal component analysis. J Soc Food Agric 86:1526-1536. doi:10.1002/jsfa.2541
17
Ma HY (2007) Changes of endogenous hormones in grapevine during its development. MSc thesis, Northwest Science & Technology University of Agriculture and Forestry, Yangling, China
18
Milosevic T, Milosevic N (2011) Quantitative analysis of the main biological and fruit quality traits of F1 plum gonotypes (Prunus domestica L.). Acta Sci Pol Hortorum Cultus 10:95-107
19
Munnoz-Robredo P, Robledo P, Manr iquez D, Molina R (2011) Characterization of sugars and organic acids in commercial varieties of table grapes. Chil J Agric Res 71:452-458. doi:10.4067/S0718-58392011000300017
20
Ozawa T, Amamiya T, Sato T, Furuya J, Furuya K, Miyake M, Saito Y, Hirabayashi T, Motizuki F, et al (2000) ‘Summer Black’: a new seedless grape. Bull. Yamanashi Fruit Tree Exp Sta 10:1-9
21
Park YS, Heo JY, Um NY, Bang SB, Park SM (2015) Growth and fruit characteristics of hypo-, hyper-tetraploid grapes. Korean J Breed Sci 47:192-198. doi:10.9787/KJBS.2015.47.3.192
22
Robertson JA, Meredith FI, Scorza R (1988) Characteristics of fruit from high- and low-quality peach cultivars. HortScience 23:1032- 1034
23
Shiraishi M (1995) Proposed descriptors for organic acids to evaluate grape germplasm. Euphytica 81:13-20. doi:10.1007/BF00022454
24
Shiraishi M (2000) Comparison in changes in sugars, organic acids and amino acids during berry ripening of sucrose- and hexose-accumulating grape cultivars. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 69:141-148. doi:10.2503/jjshs.69.141
25
Sonego L, Lurie S, Zuthi Y, Kaplonov T, Ben-Arie R, Kosto I (2002) Factors affecting taste scores of early season seedless table grape cv. Mystery and Prime. J Agric Food Chem 50:544-548. doi:10.1021/jf0107151
26
Soyer Y, Koca N, Karadeniz F (2003) Organic acid profile of Turkish white grapes and grape juices. J Food Comp Anal 16:629-636. doi:10.1016/S0889-1575(03)00065-6
27
Wakana A, Fukudome I, Hanada N, Hiramatsu M, Sakai K, Kajiwara K (2008) ‘Bea–Kei’, a new triploid seedless grape cultivar derived from a ‘Muscat Bailey A’ × ‘Kyoho’ cross. J Fac Agric Kyushu Univ. 53:423-427
28
Yamane H, Kurihara A, Nagata K, Yamada M, Kishi M, Yoshinaga S, Matsumoto R, Kanato T, Ozawa T, et al (1993) New grape cultivar ‘Haney Seedless’. Bull Fruit Tree Res Sta 25:45-56
Information
  • Publisher :KOREAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국원예학회
  • Journal Title :Horticultural Science and Technology
  • Journal Title(Ko) :원예과학기술지
  • Volume : 34
  • No :5
  • Pages :761-770
  • Received Date : 2016-03-24
  • Revised Date : 2016-03-25
  • Accepted Date : 2016-05-24
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.12972/kjhst.20160080
Journal Informaiton Horticultural Science and Technology Horticultural Science and Technology
Online Submission
  • scopus
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • crossref crossmark
  • crossref cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close